Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:32:24.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Evaluation of Illness Behaviour and Exaggeration of Disability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

J. R. Clayer ,
C. L. Bookless-Pratz  and
M. W. Ross
J. R. Clayer*
Affiliation:
Mental Health Research and Evaluation Centre, 242 Greenhill Road, Glenside, South Australia, 5064
C. L. Bookless-Pratz
Affiliation:
Mental Health Research and Evaluation Centre, 242 Greenhill Road, Glenside, South Australia, 5064
M. W. Ross
Affiliation:
Flinders University Medical School, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042
*
∗Correspondence
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The evaluation of illness behaviour can be complicated by subjective influences in either the patient or the clinician; these often arise in the evaluation of persons seeking compensation for injuries in which the symptoms are apparently exaggerated. The present study attempts to assess the usefulness of the CE Scale in determining the degree of conscious exaggeration by compensation claimants. Comparisons were made between psychiatrists' clinical evaluations of claimants and the scores obtained on this scale. The relationship between these two measures was found to be significant at the 1% level and specificity and sensitivity for less than 25% exaggeration on psychiatrists rating with a CE Scale cut-off of 11.69% and 100% respectively: for less than 34% exaggeration, they were 88% and 83%.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 148 , Issue 3 , March 1986 , pp. 296 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clayer, J. R., Bookless, C. L. & Ross, M. W. (1984) Neurosis and conscious symptom exaggeration: Its differentiation by the Illness Behaviour Questionnaire. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 28, 3, 237–241.Google Scholar
Miller, H. (1961) Accident neurosis. Lect. II. British Medical Journal, 1, 992.Google Scholar
Nemiah, J. C. (1975) Hysterical neuroses conversion type. In Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry II. 2nd ed. (eds. Kaplan, H. I., Freedman, A. M. & Fadock, B. J.) P. 1208. Baltimore, Maryland: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Pilowsky, I. & Spence, N. D. (1975) Patterns of abnormal illness behaviour in patients with intractable pain. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 19, 279–287.Google Scholar
Pilowsky, I. & Spence, N. D. (1983) Manual for the Illness Behaviour Questionnaire (IBQ) (2nd ed.). Adelaide: University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
Simon, J. & Zusman, J. (1983) The effect of contextual factors on psychiatrists' perception of illness: A case study. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 24, 186–198.Google Scholar
Slater, E. (1961) Hysteria. Journal of Mental Science, 107, 359.Google Scholar
Slater, J. E. & Glithero, E. (1965) A follow up of patients diagnosed as suffering from hysteria. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 9, 9–13.Google Scholar
Tarsh, M. J. & Royston, C. (1985) A follow-up study of accident neurosis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 18–25.Google Scholar
Watson, C. G. & Buranen, C. (1979) The frequency and identification of false positive conversion reactions. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 167, 4, 243–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weighill, V. E. (1983) Compensation Neurosis. A review of the literature. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 27, 97–104.Google Scholar
Whitlock, F. A. (1967) The aetiology of hysteria. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 43, 144–162.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.