Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T13:00:15.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Cerebral Lesions on Intellectual Function: A Review of Current Research Trends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Malcolm Piercy
Malcolm Piercy*
Affiliation:
Maida Vale Hospital, London, W.9, and Royal Free Hospital, London, W.C.1; Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The literature of the psychological effects of brain injury is extensive and disconnected. It abounds in inadequate definitions, incompatible theories and disagreements as to appropriate methods of investigation. This situation results partly from the variety of disciplines which guide different investigators; but it results too from the great logical difficulties encountered by anybody who seeks to throw light on normal intelligent behaviour by studying the effects of cerebral lesions. Some have even argued that such attempts are always unprofitable (47, 77).

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 110 , Issue 466 , May 1964 , pp. 310 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1964 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ackerly, S. (1935). “Instinctive, emotional and mental changes following prefrontal lobe extirpation”, Amer. J. Psychiat., 92, 717–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Ajuriaguerra, J. de, Hécaen, H., and Angelergues, R. (1960). “Les apraxies: variétés cliniques et latéralisation lésionelle”, Rev. Neurol., 102, 28–56.Google Scholar
3. Akelattis, A. J. (1941). “Studies on the corpus callosum. II: The higher visual functions in each homonymous field following complete section of the corpus callosum”, Arch. Neurol, Psychiat., 45, 788–796.Google Scholar
4. Akelattis, A. J. (1944) “A study of gnosis, praxis and language following section of the corpus callosum and anterior commissure”, J. Neurosurg., 1, 94–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Akelattis, A. J., Risteen, W. A., Herren, R. Y., and Van Wagenen, W. P. (1942). “Studies on the corpus callosum. Ill: A contribution to the study of dyspraxia and apraxia following partial and complete section of the corpus callosum”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 47, 971–1007.Google Scholar
6. Anderson, A. L. (1951). “The effect of laterality localisation of brain lesions on the Wechsler Bellevue subtests”, J. Clin. Psychol., 7, 149–153.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Annett, M., Lee, D., and Ounsted, C. (1961). “Intellectual disabilities in relation to lateralised features in the EEG”. Paper read to the 2nd National Spastics Society Study Group, Bristol. Google Scholar
8. Arseni, C., Voinesco, I., and Goldenberg, M. (1958). “Considérations clinico-statistiques sur le syndrome parietal dans les tumeurs cérébrales”, Rev. Neurol., 99, 623–638.Google Scholar
9. Battersby, W. S. (1956). “Neuropsychology of higher processes: cerebral damage and visual perception”, in: Progress in Clinical Psychology New York, pp. 303–325.Google Scholar
10. Battersby, W. S., Krieger, H. P., Pollack, M., and Bender, M. B. (1953). “Figure ground discrimination and the abstract attitude in patients with cerebral tumours”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 70, 703–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Battersby, W. S., Teuber, H. L., and Bender, M. B. (1953). “Problem solving behaviour in men with frontal or occipital brain injuries”, J. Psychol., 35, 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Bauer, R., and Becka, D. (1954). “Intellect after cerebro-vascular accident”, J. Nero. Ment. Dis., 120, 379–384.Google Scholar
13. Bay, E. (1953). “Disturbances of visual perception and their examination”, Brain, 76, 515–550.Google Scholar
14. Benton, A. L. (1955). “Right left discrimination, finger localization and cerebral status”, Acta Psychol., 11, 165–166.Google Scholar
15. Benton, A. L. (1955). “Right left discrimination and finger localization in defective children”, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 74, 583–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Benton, A. L. (1961). “The fiction of the ‘Gerstmann Syndrome’”, J. Neurol. Neurosurgery Psychiat., 24, 176–181.Google Scholar
17. Benton, A. L. (1962). “Clinical symptomatology in right and left hemisphere lesions”, in: Interhemispheric Relations and Cerebral Dominance (Ed.: Mountcastle, ). Baltimore, pp. 253–263.Google Scholar
18. Benton, A. L., Hutcheon, J. F., and Seymour, E. (1951). “Arithmetic ability, finger localization capacity and right left discrimination in normal and defective children”, Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 21, 756–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Beringer, K., and Stein, J. (1930). “Analyse eines Falles von ‘reiner’ Alexie”, Z. ges. Neurol. Psychiat., 123, 472–478.Google Scholar
20. Blum, R. A. (1952). “Effects of subtotal lesions of frontal granular cortex on delayed reaction in monkeys”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 67, 375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Blum, J. S., Chow, K.L., and Pribram, K. H. (1950). “A behavioural analysis of the organization of the parieto-tempero-preoccipital cortex”, J. Comp. Neurol., 93, i, 53–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Brain, W. R. (1941). “Visual discrimination with special reference to lesions of the right cerebral hemisphere”, Brain, 64, 244–272.Google Scholar
23. Brain, W. R. (1961). Speech Disorders, Aphasia, Apraxia and Agnosia. London.Google Scholar
24. Bramwell, B. (1899). “On crossed aphasia”, Lancet, i, 1473–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Brickner, R. (1936). The Intellectual Functions of the Frontal Lobes. New York.Google Scholar
26. Broca, P. (1861). “Nouvelle observation d'aphémie produite par une lésion de la moitié postérieure des deuxièmes et troisièmes circonvolutions frontales”, Bull. Soc. Anat. Paris, 6, 398–407.Google Scholar
27. Broca, P. (1865). “Sur la faculté du langage articulé”, Bulletin de la Societe d'Anthropologie, 6, 493–494.Google Scholar
28. Brown, J. R., and Simonson, J. (1957). “A clinical study of 100 aphasic patients. 1. Observations on lateralization and localization of lesions”, Neurology, 7, 777–783.Google Scholar
29. Brutkowski, S., Konorski, J., Lawicka, W., Stepien, I., and Stepien, L. (1956). “The effect of removal of frontal poles of the cerebral cortex on motor conditioned reflexes”, Acta Biol. Exper., 17, 167–188.Google Scholar
30. Cairns, H., and Davidson, M. A. (1951). “Hemispherectomy in the treatment of infantile hemiplegia”, Lancet, ii, 411–415.Google Scholar
31. Casey, T., and Ettlinger, G. (1960). “The occasional independence of dyslexia and dysgraphia from dysphasia”, J. Neurol. Neurosurgery Psychiat., 23, 228–236.Google Scholar
32. Cattell, R. B. (1943). “The measurement of adult intelligence”, Psychol. Bull., 40, 153–193.Google Scholar
33. Chapman, L. F., and Wolff, H. G. (1959). “The cerebral hemispheres and the highest integrative functions of man”, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol., 1, 357–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Chesher, E. C. (1936). “Some observations concerning the relation of handedness to the language mechanism”, Bull. Neurol. Inst. N.Y., 4, 556–562.Google Scholar
35. Chow, K. L. (1952). “Further studies on selective ablation of associative cortex in relation to visually mediated behaviour”, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 45, 109–118.Google Scholar
36. Chow, K. L. (1954). “Effects of temporal neocortical ablation on visual discrimination learning sets in monkeys”, ibid., 47, 194–198.Google Scholar
37. Chow, K. L. and Survis, J. (1958). “Retention of over-learned visual habit after temporal cortical ablation in monkey”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 79, 640–646.Google Scholar
38. Cohen, J. (1952). “Factors underlying Wechsler Bellevue performance of 3 neuropsychiatric groups”, J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 47, 359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Cohen, J. (1957). “The factorial structure of the W.A.I.S. between early adulthood and old age”, J. Consult. Psychol., 21, 283–290.Google Scholar
40. Cole, M., Schutta, H., and Warrington, E. (1962). “Visual disorientation in homonymous half-fields”, Neurology, 12, 277–63.Google Scholar
41. Cole, M., Schutta, H., and Zangwill, O. L. (1963). “Déjà vu in temporal lobe epilepsy”, J. Neurol. Neurosurgery Psychiat., 26, 37–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Conrad, K. (1949). “Uber aphasische Sprachstörungen bei hirnverlegten Linkshänder”, Nervenarzt., 20, 148–154.Google Scholar
43. Costa, L., and Vaughan, H. (1962). “Performance of patients with lateralized cerebral lesions. I: Verbal and perceptual tests”, J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 134, 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44. Critchley, M. (1953). The Parietal Lobes. London.Google Scholar
45. Dejerine, J. (1892). “Contribution à Pétude anatomo-pathologique et clinique des différentes variétés de cécité” verbale”, Mémoires de la Societé de Biologie, 4, 61.Google Scholar
46. Denny-Brown, D. (1958). “The nature of apraxia”, J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 126, 9–33.Google Scholar
47. Deutsch, J. A. (1960). The Structural Basis of Behaviour. Chicago.Google Scholar
48. Dide, M. (1938). “Les désorientations temporospatiales et la prépondérance de l'hémisphere droit dans les agnoso-akinésies proprioceptives”, Encéphale, 33, 276–294.Google Scholar
49. Dimsdale, H., Logue, V., and Piercy, M. (1964). “A case of persisting impairment of recent memory following right temporal lobectomy”, Neuropsychologic. (In press.) Google Scholar
50. Downer, J. L. de C. (1962). “Interhemispheric integration in the visual system”, in: Interhemispheric Relations and Cerebral Dominance (Ed.: Mountcastle, ). Baltimore, pp. 87–100.Google Scholar
51. Ebner, F. F., and Myers, R. E. (1962). “Corpus callosum and the interhemispheric transmission of tactual learning”, J. Neurophysiol., 25, 380–391.Google Scholar
52. Espir, M., and Russell, W. R. (1961). Traumatic Aphasia. London.Google Scholar
53. Ettlinger, G. (1956). “Sensory deficits in visual agnosia”, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 19, 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54. Ettlinger, G. (1957). “Visual discrimination following successive unilateral temporal excisions in monkeys”, J. Physiol., 140, 38–39.Google Scholar
55. Ettlinger, G. (1960). “The description and interpretation of pictures in cases of brain lesion”, J. Ment. Sci., 106, 1337–1346.Google Scholar
56. Ettlinger, G. and Hurwitz, L. (1962). “Dyslexia and its associated disturbances”, Neurology, 12, 477–480.Google Scholar
57. Ettlinger, G., Jackson, C. V., and Zangwill, O. L. (1955). “Dysphasia following right temporal lobectomy in a right-handed man”, J. Neurol Neurosurgery Psychiat., 18, 214–217.Google Scholar
58. Ettlinger, G., Jackson, C. V., and Zangwill, O. L. (1956). “Cerebral dominance in sinistrals”, Brain, 79, 569–588.Google Scholar
59. Ettlinger, G., Jackson, C. V., and Kalsbeck, J. E. (1962). “Changes in tactile discrimination and in visual reading after successive and simultaneous bilateral posterior parietal ablations in the monkey”, J. Neurol. Neurosurgery Psychiat., 25, 256–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60. Ettlinger, G., Jackson, C. V., and Wyke, M. (1961). “Defects in identifying objects visually in a patient with cerebrovascular disease”, ibid., 24, 254–259.Google Scholar
61. Foix, C. (1916). “Contribution a l'étude de l'apraxie idéomotrice”, Rev. Neurol., 1, 285–298.Google Scholar
62. Freud, S. (1953). On Aphasia. London.Google Scholar
63. Gardner, W. J., Karnosh, L. J., McClure, C. C., and Gardner, A. K. (1955). “Residual function following hemispherectomy for tumour and for infantile hemiplegia”, Brain, 78, 487–502.Google Scholar
64. Gerstmann, J. (1927). “Fingeragnosie und isolierte Agraphie. Ein neues Syndrom”, Z. ges. Neurol. Psychiat., 108, 152–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65. Gerstmann, J. (1930). “Zur Symptomatologie der Hirnläsionen in Ubergangsgebiet der unteren parietal und mittleren occipital-Windung”, Nervenarzt., 3, 691–695.Google Scholar
66. Geschwind, N. (1962). “The anatomy of acquired reading disorders”, in: Reading Disabilities, Progress and Research Needs in Dyslexia (Ed.: Money, J.). Baltimore, pp. 115–129.Google Scholar
67. Geschwind, N. and Kaplan, E. (1962). “A human cerebral deconnection syndrome”, Neurology, 12, 675–685.Google Scholar
68. Ghent, L., Weinstein, S., Semmes, J., and Teuber, H. L. (1955). “Effect of unilateral brain injury in man on learning of a tactual discrimination”, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 48, 478–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
69. Glees, P., and Griffith, H. B. (1952). “Bilateral destruction of the hippocampus (cornu Ammonis) in a case of dementia”, Monatsschr. Psychiat. u. Neurol., 123, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70. Goldstein, K. (1936). “The significance of the frontal lobes for mental performance”, J. Neurol. Psychopathol., 17, 27–40.Google Scholar
71. Goldstein, K. (1948). Language and Language Disturbances. New York.Google Scholar
72. Goodglass, H., and Quadfasel, F. A. (1954). “Language laterality in left-handed aphasics”, Brain, 77, 521–548.Google Scholar
73. Gottschaldt, K. (1926). “Uber den Einfluss der Erfahrung auf die Wahrnehmung von Figuren. I.”, Psychol. Forschung., 8, 261–317.Google Scholar
74. Gottschaldt, K. (1929). “Uber den Einfluss der Erfahrung auf die Wahrnehmung von Figuren. II.”, ibid., 12, 1–87.Google Scholar
75. Greenblatt, M., Arnot, A., and Solomon, H. C. (1950). Studies in Lobotomy. New York.Google Scholar
76. Greenblatt, M., Arnot, A., and Solomon, H. C. (1953). Frontal Lobes and Schizophrenia. New York.Google Scholar
77. Gregory, R. (1962). “The brain—an engineering problem”, Discovery (January).Google Scholar
78. Grewel, F. (1952). “Acalculia”, Brain, 75, 397–407.Google Scholar
79. Grunthal, E. (1947). “Uber das klinische Bild nach umschriebenem beideseitigem Ausfall der Ammonshornrinde”, Monatsschr. Psychiat. Neurol., 113, 1–16.Google Scholar
80. Guttman, E. (1942). “Aphasia in children”, Brain, 65, 205–219.Google Scholar
81. Halstead, W. C. (1947). Brain and Intelligence: A Quantitative Study of the Frontal Lobes. Chicago.Google Scholar
82. Harlow, H. F. (1949). “The formation of learning sets”, Psychol. Rev., 56, 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
83. Harlow, H. F. and Dagnon, J. (1942). “Problem solution by monkeys following bilateral removal of the prefrontal areas”, J. Exp. Psychol., 32, 351–356.Google Scholar
84. Harlow, H. F., Davis, R. T., Settlage, P. H., and Meyer, D. R. (1952). “Analysis of frontal and posterior association syndromes in brain-damaged monkeys”, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 45, 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
85. Harlow, H. F., Davis, R. T., Settlage, P. H., and Settlage, P. H. (1948). “Effect of extirpation of frontal areas upon learning performance of monkeys”, Proc. Ass. Res. nerv. Dis., 27, 446–459.Google Scholar
86. Head, H. (1926). Aphasia and Kindred Disorders of Speech. Cambridge.Google Scholar
87. Hebb, D. O. (1939). “Intelligence in man after large removals of cerebral tissue: report of 4 left frontal lobe cases”, J. Gen. Psychol., 21, 73–87.Google Scholar
88. Hebb, D. O. (1939). “Intelligence in man after large removals of cerebral tissue: defects following right temporal lobectomy”, ibid., 21, 437–446.Google Scholar
89. Hebb, D. O. (1942). “The effect of early and late brain injury upon test scores and the nature of normal adult intelligence”, Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 85, 275–292.Google Scholar
90. Hebb, D. O. (1945). “Man's frontal lobes: a critical review”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 54, 10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
91. Hebb, D. O. (1949). The Organization of Behaviour. New York and London.Google Scholar
92. Hebb, D. O. (1959). “Intelligence, brain function and the theory of mind”, Brain, 82, 260–275.Google Scholar
93. Hebb, D. O. and Penfield, W. (1940). “Human behaviour after extensive bilateral removal from the frontal lobes”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 44, 421–438.Google Scholar
94. Hécaen, H. (1962). “Clinical symptomatology in right and left hemisphere lesions”, in: Interhemispheric Relations and Cerebral Dominance (Ed.: Mountcastle, ). Baltimore, pp. 215–243.Google Scholar
95. Hécaen, H. and Ajuriaguerra, J. de (1951). “Le problème clinique et anatomique de l'apraxie de l'habillage”, Sistema Nervoso, 3, 1–18.Google Scholar
96. Hécaen, H. and Ajuriaguerra, J. de (1952). Méconnaissances et Hallucinations Corporelles. Paris.Google Scholar
97. Hécaen, H. and Ajuriaguerra, J. de (1955). Present Problems in Neurology. Prague, pp. 63–77.Google Scholar
98. Hécaen, H. and Ajuriaguerra, J. de (1956). “Agnosie visuelle pour les objets inanimés par lésion unilaterale gauche”, Rev. Neurol., 94, 222–233.Google Scholar
99. Hécaen, H., Ajuriaguerra, J. de and Massonnet, J. (1951). “Les troubles visuo-constructifs par lésion pariéto-occipitale droite”, L'Encephale, 40, 122–179.Google Scholar
100. Hécaen, H., Ajuriaguerra, J. de and Angelergues, R. (1963). La Cécité Psychique. Etude Critique de la Notion d'Agnosie. Paris.Google Scholar
101. Hécaen, H., Ajuriaguerra, J. de and Gimeno Alava, A. (1960). “L'apraxie idéomotrice unilatérale gauche”, Rev. Neurol., 102, 648–653.Google Scholar
102. Hécaen, H., Penfield, W., Bertrand, C., and Malmo, R. (1956). “The syndrome of apractognosia due to lesions of the minor cerebral hemisphere”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 75, 400–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
103. Hécaen, H. and Piercy, M. (1956). “Paroxysmal dysphasia and the problem of cerebral dominance”, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 19, 194–201.Google Scholar
104. Heilbrun, A. B. (1956). “Psychological test performance as a function of lateralization of cerebral lesion”, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 49, 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
105. Heilbrun, A. B. (1959). “Lateralization of cerebral lesion and performance on spatial-temporal tasks”, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol., 1, 282–287.Google Scholar
106. Heimberger, R. F., De Myer, W., and Reitan, R. M. (1957). “Neurological significance of Gerstmann's syndrome”. Paper read at the American Academy of Neurology, Boston. Google Scholar
107. Hemphill, R. E., and Klein, R. (1948). “Dressing disability as a focal sign”, J. Ment. Sci., 94, 611–622.Google Scholar
108. Hillier, W. F. (1954). “Hemispherectomy for malignant glioma”, Neurology, 4, 718–721.Google Scholar
109. Holmes, G., and Horrax, G. (1919). “Disturbances of spatial orientation and visual attention, with loss of stereoscopic vision”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1, 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
110. Howes, D. H. (1961). “Statistical properties of aphasic language”, Paper read at the 7th International Congress of Neurology, Rome. Google Scholar
111. Howes, D. (1962). “An approach to the quantitative analysis of word blindness”, in: Reading Disability: Progress and Research Needs in Dyslexia (Ed.: Money, J.). Baltimore, pp. 131–159.Google Scholar
112. Humphrey, M. E. (1951). “Consistency of hand usage”, Brit. J. Educ. Psychol., 21, 214–225.Google Scholar
113. Humphrey, M. E. and Zangwill, O. L. (1952). “Dysphasia in left-handed patients with unilateral brain lesions”, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 15, 184–193.Google Scholar
114. Jackson, J. H. (1868). “Defect of intellectual expression (aphasia) with left hemiplegia”, Lancet, i, 457.Google Scholar
115. Jackson, J. H. (1876). “Case of large cerebral tumour without optic neuritis and with left hemiplegia and imperception”, Roy. Land. Ophthal. Hosp. Rep., 8, 434–444.Google Scholar
116. Jackson, J. H. (1880). “On aphasia with left hemiplegia”, Lancet, i, 637–638.Google Scholar
117. Jacobsen, C. F. (1935). “Functions of frontal association area in primates”, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 33, 558–659.Google Scholar
118. Kennedy, F., and Wolf, A. (1936). “The relationship of intellect to speech defect in aphasic patients”, J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 84, 125–145, 293–311.Google Scholar
119. Kimura, D. (1961). “Some effects of temporal lobe damage on auditory perception”, Canad. J. Psychol., 15, 156–165.Google Scholar
120. Kimura, D. (1963). “Right temporal lobe damage: perception of unfamiliar stimuli after damage”, Arch. Neurol., 8, 264–271.Google Scholar
121. Kinsbourne, M., and Warrington, E. K. (1962). “A study of finger agnosia”, Brain, 85, 47–66.Google Scholar
122. Kleist, K. (1934). “Gehirnpathologie vornehmlich auf Grund der Kriegserfahrungen”, in: Handbuch der ärztlichen Erfahrungen im Weltkriege, 4, 343. Leipzig.Google Scholar
123. Klüver, H., and Bucy, P. C. (1938). “An analysis of certain effects of bilateral temporal lobectomy in the rhesus monkey, with special reference to ‘psychic blindness’”, J. Psychol., 5, 33–54.Google Scholar
124. Klüver, H., and Bucy, P. C. (1939). “Preliminary analysis of functions of the temporal lobes in monkeys”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 42, 979–1000.Google Scholar
125. Krynauw, R. A. (1950). “Infantile hemiplegia treated by removing one cerebral hemisphere”, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 13, 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
126. Lange, J. (1933). “Probleme der Fingeragnosie”, J. ges. Neurol. Psychiat., 147, 594–610.Google Scholar
127. Lange, J. (1936). “Agnosien u. Apraxien”, in: Bumke, O., and Foerster, O.: Handbuch d. Neurologie, 6, 807–960.Google Scholar
128. Landsell, H. (1962). “A sex difference in effect of temporal lobe neurosurgery on design preference”, Nature, 194, 852–854.Google Scholar
129. Lashley, K. S. (1929). Brain Mechanisms and Intelligence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
130. Lashley, K. S. (1931) “Cerebral control versus reflexology”, J. Gen. Psychol., 5, 3–20.Google Scholar
131. Lashley, K. S. (1938). “Factors limiting recovery after central nervous lesions”, J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 88, 733–755.Google Scholar
132. Lashley, K. S. (1948). “The mechanism of vision. XVIII. Effects of destroying the visual ‘associative areas’ of the monkey”, Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 37, 107–166.Google Scholar
133. Lawicka, W. (1957). “The effects of prefrontal lobectomy on the vocal conditioned reflexes in dogs”, Acta Biol. Exper., 17, 318–325.Google Scholar
134. Liepmann, H. (1900). “Das Krankheitsbild der Apraxie (motorischen Asymbolie)”, Monatsschr. F. Psych., 8, 15–44.Google Scholar
135. Liepmann, H. (1905). Ueber Störungen des Handelns bei Gehimkranken. Berlin.Google Scholar
136. Liepmann, H. (1908). Drei Aufsätze dem Apraxiegebiet. Berlin.Google Scholar
137. Lissauer, H. (1890). “Ein Fall von Seelenblindheit nebst einem Beitrage zur Theorie derselben”, Arch. Psychiat. Nevenkr., 21, 222–270.Google Scholar
138. Lorenz, K. (1937). “The companion in the bird's world”, Auk., 54, 245–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
139. Luria, A. R. (1947). Traumatic Aphasia: its Syndromes, Psychopathohgy and Treatment. Moscow.Google Scholar
140. Luria, A. R. (1960). “Verbal regulation of behaviour”, in: The Central Nervous System and Behaviour (Ed.: Brazier, M.). Princetown, pp. 359–423.Google Scholar
141. Marie, P. (1906). “Revision de la question de l'aphasie; la troisième circonvolution gauche ne joue aucun rôle spécial dans la fonction du langage”, Sem. Médicale, 26, 241–247.Google Scholar
142. Marie, P., Bouttier, M., and Bailey, P. (1922). “La planotopokinésie. Etude sur les erreurs d'exécution de certains mouvements dans leurs rapports avec la représentation spatiale”, Rev. Neurol., 1, 505–512.Google Scholar
143. McFie, J. (1960). “Psychological testing in clinical neurology”, J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 131, 383–393.Google Scholar
144. McFie, J. (1961). “The effect of hemispherectomy on intellectual functioning in cases of infantile hemiplegia”, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 24, 240–249.Google Scholar
145. McFie, J. (1961). “Intellectual impairment in children with localized post-infantile cerebral lesions”, ibid., 24, 361–365.Google Scholar
146. McFie, J. (1961). “Recent advances in phrenology”, Lancet, 360–363.Google Scholar
147. McFie, J. and Piercy, M. (1952). “Intellectual impairment with localized cerebral lesions”, Brain, 75, 292–311.Google Scholar
148. McFie, J., Piercy, M. (1952). “The relation of laterality of lesion to performance on Weigl's sorting test”, J Ment. Sci., 98, 299–305.Google Scholar
149. McFie, J., Piercy, M. and Zangwill, O. L. (1950). “Visual spatial agnosia associated with lesions of the right cerebral hemisphere”, Brain, 73, 167–190.Google Scholar
150. McFie, J., Piercy, M. and Zangwill, O. L. (1960). “Visual constructive disabilities associated with lesions of the left cerebral hemisphere”, ibid., 83, 243–260.Google Scholar
151. Mensh, I. N., Schwartz, H. G., Matarazzo, R. G., and Matarazzo, J. D. (1952). “Psychological functioning following cerebral hemispherectomy in man”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 67, 787–796.Google Scholar
152. Mettler, F. A., (Ed.) (1952). Columbia-Greystone Associates—-Second Group. Psycho-surgical Problems. London.Google Scholar
153. Meyer, D. R. (1951). “Intraproblem-interproblem relationships in learning by monkeys”, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 44, 162–167.Google Scholar
154. Meyer, D. R. (1951). “Food deprivation and discrimination reversal learning by monkeys”, J. Exp. Psychol., 41, 10–16.Google Scholar
155. Meyer, D. R. (1958). “Some psychological determinants of sparing and loss following damage to the brain”, in: Biological and Biochemical Bases of Behaviour (Ed.: Harlow, H. F., and Woolsey, C. N.). Madison, pp. 173–192.Google Scholar
156. Meyer, V. (1957). “Critique of psychological approaches to brain damage”, J. Ment. Sci., 103, 80–109.Google Scholar
157. Meyer, V. (1959). “Cognitive changes following temporal lobectomy for relief of temporal lobe epilepsy”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 81, 299–309.Google Scholar
158. Meyer, V. (1960). “Psychological effects of brain damage”, in: Handbook of Abnormal Psychology (Ed.: Eysenck, H.), pp. 529–565.Google Scholar
159. Meyer, V. and Jones, H. G. (1957). “Patterns of cognitive test performance as functions of the lateral localization of cerebral abnormalities in the temporal lobe”, J. Ment. Sci., 103, 758–772.Google Scholar
160. Meyer, V. and Yates, A.J. (1955). “Intellectual changes following temporal lobectomy for psychomotor epilepsy”, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 18, 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
161. Milner, B. (1954). “Intellectual function of the temporal lobes”, Psychol. Bull., 51, 42–62.Google Scholar
162. Milner, B. (1958). “Psychological defects produced by temporal lobe excision”, Proc. Ass. Res. nerv. Dis., 36, 244–257.Google Scholar
163. Milner, B. (1959). “The memory defect in bilateral hippocampal lesions”, Psychiat. Res. Reports, 11, 43–57.Google Scholar
164. Milner, B. (1962). “Laterality effect in audition”, in: Interhemispheric Relations and Cerebral Dominance (Ed.: Mountcastle, ). Baltimore, pp. 177–195.Google Scholar
165. Milner, B. (1963). “Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting”, Arch. Neurol., 9, 90–100.Google Scholar
166. Milner, B., Branch, C., and Rasmussen, T. (1962). “Study of short-term memory after intracarotid injection of sodium amytal”, Trans. Amer. Neurol. Ass. Google Scholar
167. Mishkin, M. (1954). “Visual discrimination performance following partial ablations of the temporal lobe. II: Ventral surface versus hippocampus”, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 47, 187–193.Google Scholar
168. Mishkin, M. (1957). “Effects of small frontal lesions on delayed alternation in monkeys”, J. Neurophysiol., 20, 615–622.Google Scholar
169. Mishkin, M. (1958). “Visual discrimination impairment after cutting cortical connections between the infero-temporal and striate areas in monkeys”, Amer. Psychol., 13, 414.Google Scholar
170. Mishkin, M. (1962). “A possible link between interhemispheric integration in monkeys and cerebral damage in man”, in: Interhemispheric Relations and Cerebral Dominance (Ed.: Mountcastle, ). Baltimore, pp. 101–107.Google Scholar
171. Mishkin, M. and Pribram, K. H. (1954). “Visual discrimination performance following partial ablations of the temporal lobe. I. Ventral versus lateral”, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 47, 14–20.Google Scholar
172. Morlaas, J. (1928). Contribution a l'Etude de l'Apraxie. Paris.Google Scholar
173. Morrow, R. S., and Mark, J. C. (1955). “The correlations of intelligence and neurological findings on 22 patients autopsied for brain damage”, J. Consult. Psychol., 19, 283–289.Google Scholar
174. Mullan, S., and Penfield, W. (1959). “Illusions of comparative interpretation and emotion”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 81, 269–284.Google Scholar
175. Munk, H. (1896). Ueber die Functionen der Grosshirnrinde. Berlin.Google Scholar
176. Myers, R. E. (1955). “Interocular transfer of pattern discrimination in cats following section of crossed optic fibres”, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 48, 470–473.Google Scholar
177. Myers, R. E. (1956). “Function of corpus callosum in interocular transfer”, Brain, 79, 358–363.Google Scholar
178. Myers, R. E. (1957). “Corpus callosum and interhemispheric communication: enduring memory effects”, Fed. Proc., 16, 92.Google Scholar
179. Myers, R. E. (1959). “Interhemispheric communication through the corpus callosum: limitations under conditions of conflict”, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 52, 1–6.Google Scholar
180. Myers, R. E. (1962). “Transmission of visual information within and between hemispheres: a behavioural study”, in: Interhemispheric Relations and Cerebral Dominance (Ed.: Mountcastle, V. B.). Baltimore.Google Scholar
181. Nichols, I. C., and Hunt, J. McV. (1940). “A case of partial bilateral frontal lobectomy: a psychopathological study”, Amer. J. Psychiat., 96, 1063–1087.Google Scholar
182. Nielson, J. M. (1937). “Unilateral cerebral dominance as related to mind blindness. Minimal lesion causing agnosia for objects”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 38, 108–135.Google Scholar
183. Nielson, J. M. (1958). Memory and Amnesia. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
184. Orbach, J., and Fantz, R. L. (1958). “Differential effects of temporal neocortical resections on overtrained and non-overtrained visual habits in monkeys”, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 51, 126–129.Google Scholar
185. Paterson, A., and Zangwtll, O. L. (1944). “Disorders of visual space perception associated with lesions of the right cerebral hemisphere”, Brain, 67, 331–358.Google Scholar
186. Penfield, W. (1954). “Studies of the cerebral cortex of man—a review and an interpretation”, in: Delafresnaye, J. F., Ed.: Brain Mechanisms and Consciousness. Springfield.Google Scholar
187. Penfield, W. (1954). “The permanent record of the stream of consciousness”, Proc. 14th Internat. Cong. Psychol., Montreal, Canada, pp. 47–69.Google Scholar
188. Penfield, W. and Evans, J. (1934). “Functional defects produced by cerebral lobectomies”, Proc. Ass. Res. nerv. Dis., 13, 352–377.Google Scholar
189. Penfield, W. and Evans, J. (1935). “The frontal lobe in man: a clinical study of maximum removals”, Brain, 58, 115–133.Google Scholar
190. Penfield, W., Evans, J. and Jasper, H. H. (1954). Epilepsy and Functional Anatomy of the Human Brain. Boston.Google Scholar
191. Penfield, W., Evans, J. and Milner, B. (1958). “The memory deficit produced by bilateral lesions in the hippocampal zone”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 79, 475–497.Google Scholar
192. Penfield, W., Evans, J. and Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and Brain Mechanisms. New Jersey: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
193. Piercy, M. (1959). “Testing for intellectual impairment—some comments on the tests and the testers”, J. Ment. Sci., 105, 489–495.Google Scholar
194. Piercy, M., Hécaen, H., and Ajuriaguerra, J. de. (1960). “Constructional apraxia associated with unilateral cerebral lesions—left and right sided cases compared”, Brain, 83, 225–242.Google Scholar
195. Piercy, M., Hécaen, H., and Smyth, V. (1962). “Right hemisphere dominance for certain non-verbal intellectual skills”, ibid., 85, 775–790.Google Scholar
196. Poetzl, O. (1928). Die Aphasielehre vom Standpunkte der klinischen Psychiatric. I. Die optisch—agnostischen Störungen. Leipzig.Google Scholar
197. Pollack, M., Battersby, W. S., and Bender, M. B. (1957). “Tachistoscopic identification of contour in patients with brain damage”, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 50, 220–227.Google Scholar
198. Poppelreuter, W. (1917). Die psychischen Schädigungen durch Kopfschuss. IV. Die optische Apraxie. Leipzig.Google Scholar
199. Pribram, K. H., Mishkin, M., Rosvold, H. E., and Kaplan, S. J. (1952). “Effects on delayed-response performance of lesions of dorsolateral and ventromedial frontal cortex of baboons”, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 45, 565–575.Google Scholar
200. Reitan, R. M. (1959). The Effects of Brain Lesions on Adaptive Abilities in Human Beings. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
201. Rey, J. H., Pond, D. A., and Evans, C. C. (1949). “Clinical and electroencephalographic studies of temporal lobe function”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 42, 891–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
202. Riddoch, G. (1935). “Visual disorientation in homonymous half fields”, Brain, 58, 376–382.Google Scholar
203. Riopelle, A. J., Alper, R. G., Strong, P. N., and Ades, H. W. (1953). “Multiple discrimination and patterned string performance of normal and temporal-lobectomized monkeys”, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 46, 145–149.Google Scholar
204. Rose, F. C., and Symonds, C. P. (1960). “Persistent memory defect following encephalitis”, Brain, 83, 195–212.Google Scholar
205. Rowe, S. N. (1937). “Mental changes following the removal of the right cerebral hemisphere for brain tumour”, Amer. J. Psychiat., 94, 605–614.Google Scholar
206. Rylander, G. (1939). “Personality changes after operations on the frontal lobes”, Acta Psychiat. Neurol. Suppl., 20.Google Scholar
207. Rylander, G. (1943). “Mental changes after excision of cerebral tissue. A clinical study of 16 cases of resections in the parietal, temporal and occipital lobes”, ibid., 25, 1–81 (Suppl. 25).Google Scholar
208. Scheller, H., and Seidermann, H. (1932). “Zur frage der optisch-räumlichen Agnosie”, Monatschr. Psychiat. Neurol., 81, 97–189.Google Scholar
209. Schuell, H., and Jenkins, J. (1961). “Reduction of vocabulary in aphasia”, Brain, 84, 243–261.Google Scholar
210. Scoville, W. B. (1954). “The limbic lobe in man”, J. Neurosurg., 11, 64–66.Google Scholar
211. Scoville, W. B. and Milner, B. (1957). “Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions”, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 20, 11–21.Google Scholar
212. Semmes, Josephine, Weinstein, S., Ghent, Lila and Teuber, H. L. (1954). “Performance on complex tactual tasks after brain injury in man: analyses by locus of lesion”, Amer. J. Psychol., 67, 220–240.Google Scholar
213. Semmes, Josephine, Weinstein, S., Ghent, Lila and Teuber, H. L. (1955). “Spatial orientation in man after cerebral injury. I. Analysis by locus of lesion”, J. Psychol., 39, 227–244.Google Scholar
214. Semmes, Josephine, Weinstein, S., Ghent, Lila and Teuber, H. L. (1960). Somato-Sensory changes after Penetrating Brain Wounds in Man. Monograph for the Commonwealth Fund, Cambridge, Mass. Google Scholar
215. Senden, M. von (1960). Space and Sight. The Perception of Space and Shape in the Congenitally Blind before and after Operation. London.Google Scholar
216. Settlage, P., Zable, M., and Harlow, H. (1948). “Problem solution by monkeys following bilateral removal of the prefrontal areas. VI. Performance on tests requiring contradictory reactions to similar and identical stimuli”, J. Exp. Psychol., 38, 50–65.Google Scholar
217. Shalman, D. C. (1961). “The diagnostic use of the McGill Picture Anomalies Test in temporal lobe epilepsy”, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 24, 220–222.Google Scholar
218. Smith, C. (1959). “Mass action and early environment in the rat”, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 52, 154–158.Google Scholar
219. Spearman, C. (1932). The Abilities of Man. London.Google Scholar
220. Sperry, R. W. (1961). “Cerebral organization and behaviour”, Science, 133, 1749.Google Scholar
221. Sperry, R. W. (1962). “Some general aspects of interhemispheric integration”, in: Interhemispheric Relations and Cerebral Dominance (Ed.: Mountcastle, ). Baltimore, pp. 43–49.Google Scholar
222. Sperry, R. W., Stamm, J. S., and Miner, N. (1956). “Relearning tests for interocular transfer following division of optic chiasm and corpus callosum in cats”, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 49, 529–533.Google Scholar
223. Stamm, J. S., and Sperry, R. W. (1957). “Function of corpus callosum in contralateral transfer of somesthctic discrimination in cats”, ibid., 50, 138–143.Google Scholar
224. Strauss, A. A., and Lehtinen, L. E. (1950). Psychopathology and Education of the Brain Injured Child. New York.Google Scholar
225. Strauss, A., and Werner, H. (1938). “Deficiency in the finger schema in relation to arithmetic disability”, Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 8, 719–725.Google Scholar
226. Strauss, H. (1924). “Ueber konstructive Apraxie”, Mschr. Psychiat. Neurol., 56, 65–124.Google Scholar
227. Subirana, A. (1958). “The prognosis in aphasia in relation to the factor of cerebral dominance and handedness”, Brain, 81, 415–425.Google Scholar
228. Terzian, H., and Dalle Ore, G. (1955). “Syndrome of Kluver and Bucy produced in man by bilateral removal of the temporal lobes”, Neurology, 5, 373–380.Google Scholar
229. Teuber, H. L. (1955). “Physiological psychology”, Ann. Rev. Psychol., 6, 267–296.Google Scholar
230. Teuber, H. L. (1959). “Some alterations in behaviour after cerebral lesions in man”, in: Evolution of Nervous Control. American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
231. Teuber, H. L., Battersby, W. S., and Bender, M. B. (1951). “Performance of complex visual tasks after cerebral lesions”, J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 114, 413–429.Google Scholar
232. Teuber, H. L., Battersby, W. S., and Bender, M. B. (1960). Visual Field Defects after Penetrating Missile Wounds of the Brain. Cambridge, Mass. Google Scholar
233. Teuber, H. L., Battersby, W. S., and Bender, M. B. (1948). “Critical flicker frequency in defective fields of vision”, Federation Proc., 7, 1.Google Scholar
234. Teuber, H. L., Battersby, W. S., and Bender, M. B. (1950). “Perception of apparent movement across acquired scotomata in the visual field”, Amer. Psychologist, 5, 271.Google Scholar
235. Teuber, H. L., Battersby, W. S., and Liebert, R. S. (1958). “Specific and general effects of brain injury in man”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 80, 403–407.Google Scholar
236. Teuber, H. L., Battersby, W. S., and Mishkin, M. (1954). “Judgment of visual and postural vertical after brain injury”, J. Psychol., 38, 161–175.Google Scholar
237. Teuber, H. L., Battersby, W. S., and Weinstein, S. (1954). “Performance on a formboard-task after penetrating brain injury”, ibid., 38, 177–190.Google Scholar
238. Teuber, H. L., Battersby, W. S., and Weinstein, S. (1956). “Ability to discover hidden figures after cerebral lesions”, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 76, 369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
239. Thurstone, L. L., and Thurstone, T. G. (1941). “Factorial studies in intelligence”, Psychomtr. Monogr., No. 2.Google Scholar
240. Toczek, S. (1960). “Disturbances of inhibitory processes due to lesions in the frontal areas of the brain of man”, Acta Biol. Exper., 20, 103–119.Google Scholar
241. Trevarthen, C. B. (1962). “Learning in split brain monkeys”, Science, 136, 258–259.Google Scholar
242. Victor, M., Angevine, J. B., Mancall, E. L., and Fisher, C. M. (1961). “Memory loss with lesions of hippocampal formation”, Arch. Neurol., 5, 244–263.Google Scholar
243. Wada, J. A., and Rasmussen, T. (1960). “Intracerebral injection of sodium amytal for the lateralization of cerebral speech dominance”, J. Neurosurgery, 17, 266–282.Google Scholar
244. Walker, A. E. (1957). “Recent memory impairment in unilateral temporal lesions”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 78, 543–552.Google Scholar
245. Warrington, E., and Zangwill, O. L. (1957). “A study of dyslexia”, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 20, 208–215.Google Scholar
246. Wechsler, D. (1958). The Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence. London.Google Scholar
247. Wedell, K. (1960). “Variations in perceptual ability among types of cerebral palsy”, Cerebral Palsy Bulletin, 2, 149–157.Google Scholar
248. Weinstein, S., Semmes, J., Ghent, Lila, and Teuber, H. L. (1956). “Spatial orientation in man after cerebral injury. II. Analysis according to concomitant defects”, J. Psychol., 42, 249–263.Google Scholar
249. Weinstein, S., Semmes, J., Ghent, Lila, and Sersen, E. (1961). “Tactual sensitivity as a function of handedness and laterality”, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 54, 665–669.Google Scholar
250. Weinstein, S., Semmes, J., Ghent, Lila, and Teuber, H. L. (1957). “Effects of penetrating brain injury on intelligence test scores”, Science, 125, 1036–1037.Google Scholar
251. Weinstein, S., Semmes, J., Ghent, L., and Semmes, J. (1955). “Complex visual task performance after penetrating brain injury in man”, Amer. Psychologist, 10, 408.Google Scholar
252. Weisenberg, T., and McBride, K. (1935). Aphasia: A Clinical and Psychological Study. New York.Google Scholar
253. Weisenberg, T., Roe, A., and McBride, K. (1936). Adult Intelligence: A Psychological Study of Test Performance. New York.Google Scholar
254. Weiskrantz, L., Mihailovic, L., and Gross, C. G. (1962). “Effects of stimulation of frontal cortex and hippocampus on behaviour in the monkey”, Brain, 85, 487–504.Google Scholar
255. Wepman, J. (1951). Recovery from Aphasia. New York.Google Scholar
256. Werner, H., and Garrison, D. (1942). “Measurement and development of the finger schema in mentally-retarded children: relation of arithmetic achievement to performance on the Finger Schema Test”, J. Educ. Psychol., 33, 252–264.Google Scholar
257. Wilson, W. A., and Mishkin, M. (1959). “Comparison of the effect of infero-temporal and lateral occipital lesions on visually guided behaviour in monkeys”, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 52, 10–17.Google Scholar
258. Wolpert, I. (1924). “Die Simultanagnosie—Störung der Gesamtauffasung”, Z. ges. Neurol. Psychiat., 93, 397–415.Google Scholar
259. Wyke, M., and Ettlinger, G. (1961). “Efficiency of recognition in left and right visual fields”, Arch. Neurol., 5, 659–665.Google Scholar
260. Yates, A. J. (1954). “The validity of some psychological tests of brain damage”, Psychol. Bull., 51, 359–379.Google Scholar
261. Young, J. Z. (1962). “Why do we have two brains”, in: Interhemispheric Relations and Cerebral Dominance (Ed.: Mountcastle, ). Baltimore, pp. 7–24.Google Scholar
262. Zangwill, O. L. (1960). Cerebral Dominance and its Relation to Psychological Function. Edinburgh and London.Google Scholar
263. Zangwill, O. L. (1960). “Le problème de l'apraxie idéatoire”, Rev. Neurol., 102, 57–65.Google Scholar
264. Zangwill, O. L. (1962). Reading Disability: Progress and Research Needs in Dyslexia (Ed.: Money, J.). Baltimore, pp. 103–113.Google Scholar
265. Zollinger, R. (1935). “Removal of left cerebral hemisphere: report of a case”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 34, 1055–1064.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.