Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:31:46.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Treatment on the Melancholias (Depressions)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Max Hamilton*
Affiliation:
University of Leeds, Medical School (Psychiatry Annexe), 30 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9NZ

Summary

The results described are based on data from 47 male and 83 female patients randomly assigned to treatment with imipramine or phenelzine in an open trial. All were fresh (untreated) cases diagnosed as suffering from depressive illness (melancholia). They were rated before treatment and 2 and four months later. Imipramine did not give results which were significantly better than phenelzine. With both drugs it was found that patients had done either very well or very poorly at follow-up, i.e. the distribution of scores was U-shaped (or bimodal at the least).

The 55 men and 90 women who were unsuitable for treatment with drugs or who had failed to respond to such treatment were given a course of ECT and followed-up at corresponding intervals. The improvement after ECT was better than with drugs and the distribution of scores is quite different. An earlier series of male patients treated with ECT in the pre-drug days did not show as good a response to the treatment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1982 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, R., Fink, M. & Feldstein, S. (1973) Prediction of clinical response to ECT. British Journal of Psychiatry, 122, 457–60.Google Scholar
Angst, J. (1961) A clinical analysis of the effects of Tofranil in depression. Psychopharmacologia, 2, 381407.Google Scholar
Donnelly, E. F., Murphy, D. L., Waldman, I. N. & Goodwin, F. K. (1979) Prediction of anti-depressant responses to imipramine. Neuropsychobiology, 5, 94101.Google Scholar
Feighner, J. P., Robins, E., Guze, S. B., Woodruff, R. A. Jr., Winokur, G. & Munoz, R. (1972) Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 26, 5763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glassman, A., Kantor, S. & Shostak, M. (1975) Depression, delusions and drug response. American Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 716–19.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, M., Grosser, G. H. & Wechsler, H. (1962) A comparative study of anti-depressant medications and EST. American Journal of Psychiatry, 119, 144–53.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, M., Grosser, G. H. & Wechsler, H. (1964) Differential response of hospitalized depressed patients to somatic therapy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 120, 935–43.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1966) Psychotropic drugs: general considerations. International Encyclopedia of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vol. I: Clinical Pharmacology, Ch. 10 Pp 181201. London, New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1967) Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 278–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ravaris, C. L., Robinson, D. S., Ives, J. O., Nies, A. & Bartlett, D. (1980) Phenelzine and amitriptyline in the treatment of depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 1075–80.Google Scholar
Robin, A. A. & Harris, J. A. (1962) A controlled comparison of imipramine and electroplexy. Journal of Mental Science, 108, 217–19.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.