Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:28:38.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dimensions of Manifest Depression in Newly Hospitalized Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Mary Helen Michaux ,
Lettie Vander Zwaag  and
Albert A. Kurland
Mary Helen Michaux
Affiliation:
Friends of Psychiatric Research, Inc.
Lettie Vander Zwaag
Affiliation:
Friends of Psychiatric Research, Inc.
Albert A. Kurland
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Hygiene, State of Maryland Spring Grove State Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Symptoms of depression as a clinical entity have been the object of factor analyses by Hamilton (1960) and by Overall (1962). In each of these studies data consisted of observations of male in-patients whose hospital diagnosis was depression. Subjects were rated on the basis of interview behaviour in sets of items considered relevant to clinical concepts of the disorder. Dimensions obtained in Overall's analysis agreed very closely with factors which had previously been identified in psychiatric ratings of schizophrenic patients (Lorr, 1953; Lorr, McNair, Klett, and Lasky, 1962; Overall and Gorham, 1962). This finding was interpreted as evidence that “certain basic factor dimensions appear in various different types of patients” (Overall, 1962). Hamilton felt that a single word-label might describe qualitatively different behaviours, depending on diagnosis; he therefore insisted on the importance of context (nosological category) in assessing the significance of any given symptom.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 113 , Issue 502 , September 1967 , pp. 981 - 986
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1967 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1952). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1960). “A rating for depression.” J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 23, 56–62.Google Scholar
Harman, H. H. (1960). Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago: Univer. Chicago Press, 439–441.Google Scholar
Kurland, A. A., Michaux, , Mary, H., Hanlon, T. E., Ota, , Kay, Y., and Simopoulos, A. M. (1962). “The comparative effectiveness of six phenothiazine compounds, phenobarbital and inert placebo in the treatment of acutely ill patients: personality dimensions.” J. nerv. ment. Dis., 134, 48–61.Google Scholar
Lorr, M. (1953). The Multidimensional Scale for Rating Psychiatric Patients: Hospital Form 1 . Technical Bulletin TB 19–507. Washington. Veterans Administration.Google Scholar
Lorr, M., McNair, D. C., Klett, C. J., and Lasky, J. J. (1962). Inpatient Multidimensional Psychiatric Scale. Palo Alto, Calif: Consult. Psychol. Press.Google Scholar
McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., and Hemingway, P. (1964). “Further evidence for syndrome-based psychotic types.” Arch. gen. Psychiat., 11, 368–376.Google Scholar
Michaux, , Mary, H., Kurland, A. A., and Agallianos, D. D. (1966). “Chlorpromazine-chlordiazepoxide and chlorpromazine-imipramine treatment of newly hospitalized, acutely ill psychiatric patients.” Curr. ther. Res., 8 (No. 35), 117–152.Google Scholar
Overall, J. E. (1962). “Dimensions of manifest depression.” Psychiat. Res., 1, 239–245.Google Scholar
Overall, J. E. and Gorham, D. R. (1962). “The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.” Psychol. Rep., 10, 799–812.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.