Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:54:23.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Diagnosis of Psychopathy by Forensic Specialists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

William Davies  and
Philip Feldman
William Davies
Affiliation:
HM Prison, Winson Green Road, Birmingham, 18
Philip Feldman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Thirty-four forensic specialists from the Prison Service and elsewhere rated 22 alleged signs of psychopathy in order of importance. Only two respondents did not view psychopathy as a clinical entity. The remainder recognized a large number of diagnostic signs, though with much disagreement about the exact importance of each.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 138 , Issue 4 , April 1981 , pp. 329 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, R. S. Brigante, T. R. & Chase, M. (1959) The psychopathic personality: a content analysis of the concept. Journal of General Psychology, 60, 17–28.Google Scholar
Arieti, S. (1967) The Intrapsychic Self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Cleckley, H. (1964) The Mask of Sanity. St Louis, Missouri: C. V. Mosby.Google Scholar
Gray, K. C. & Hutchison, H. C. (1964) The psychopathic personality: a survey of Canadian psychiatrists' opinions. Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 9, 452–461.Google Scholar
Hare, R. D. (1970) Psychopathy: Theory and Research. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Maudsley, H. (1874) Responsibility in Mental Disease. London: King.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prichard, J. C. (1835) A Treatise on Insanity. London: Sherwood, Gilbert & Piper.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.