Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:44:43.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cross-national Invariance of Dimensions of Parental Rearing Behaviour

Comparison of Psychometric Data of Swedish Depressives and Healthy Subjects with Dutch Target Ratings on the EMBU

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Willem A. Arrindell ,
Carlo Perris ,
Hjördis Perris ,
Martin Eisemann ,
Jan van der Ende  and
Lars von Knorring
Willem A. Arrindell*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, Academic Hospital of the State University of Groningen, Oostersingel 59, 9713 EZ Groningen, The Netherlands
Carlo Perris
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry III and WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Psychiatry, Umeå University, S-901 85 Umeå, Sweden
Hjördis Perris
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Umeå University
Martin Eisemann
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Umeå University
Jan van der Ende
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, Academic Hospital, Groningen
Lars von Knorring
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Umeå University
*
∗ Correspondence
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A psychometric study on Swedish and Dutch samples used the EMBU, a self-report instrument designed to assess memories of parents' rearing behaviour. Of the four primary factors identified previously with Dutch individuals (Rejection, Emotional Warmth, Over-protection, and Favouring Subject), the first three were retrieved in a similar form in the two Swedish groups (depressives and healthy, non-patients). Examination of the metric equivalence of the scales and the strength of the factors for each group indicated that comparisons of patterns and levels between groups from the respective countries on the three factors showing cross-national constancy would be warranted. Scale-level factor analyses of these dimensions produced identical two-factor compositions (CARE and PROTECTION) across national groups which further supported this conclusion.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 148 , Issue 3 , March 1986 , pp. 305 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrindell, W. A., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Brilman, E. & Monsma, A. (1983) Psychometric evaluation of an inventory for assessment of parental rearing practices. A Dutch form of the EMBU. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 163–177.Google Scholar
Arrindell, W. A. & van der Ende, J. (1984) Replicability and invariance of dimensions of parental rearing behaviour: further Dutch experiences with the EMBU. Personality and Individual Differences (in press).Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1979) Research in multicultural societies. Implications of cross-cultural methods. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 10, 415–434.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. & Dasen, P. R. (eds) (1974) Culture and Cognition. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1983) Recent advances in the cross-cultural study of personality. In Advances in Personality Assessment, Vol. 2. (eds Butcher, J. N. & Spielberger, C. D.), pp 41–69. Hillsdale, New Jersey: LEA.Google Scholar
Grove, W. M. & Andreasen, N. C. (1982) Simultaneous tests of many hypotheses in exploratory research. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 170, 3–8.Google Scholar
Haven, S. & ten Berge, J. M. F. (1977) Tucker's coefficient of congruence as a measure of factorial invariance. An empirical study. Heymans Bulletins, HB 77-290-EX, State University of Groningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Hassanyeh, F., Eccleston, D. & Williams, J. M. G. (1983) Childhood loss and disharmony: later effects on personality and psychopathology. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 695–697.Google Scholar
Parker, G., Tuplfng, H. & Brown, L. B. (1979) A Parental Bonding Instrument. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 52, 1–10.Google Scholar
Perris, C. (1975) The bipolar unipolar dichotomy and the need for a consistent terminology. Neuropsychobiology, 1, 65–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perris, C., Jacobsson, L., Lindström, H., von Knorring, L. & Perris, H. (1980) Development of a new inventory for assessing memories of parental rearing behaviour. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 61, 265–274.Google Scholar
Saklofske, D. H. & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1978) Cross-cultural comparison of personality: New Zealand children and English children. Psychological Reports, 42, 1111–1116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanua, V. D. (1980) Familial and sociocultural antecedents of psychopathology. In Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Volume P6 Psychopathology. (eds Triandis, H. C. & Draguns, J. G.), pp 175–236. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
ten Berge, J. M. F. (1977) Optimizing Factorial Invariance. Groningen, The Netherlands: VRB.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.