Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:51:48.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concurrent Schizophrenia-Like Psychosis in Monozygous Twins Suffering from CNS Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Albert West
Albert West*
Affiliation:
Bridgewater Hospital, Eccles, Manchester, St. Crispin Hospital, Duston, Northampton, NN5 6UN
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Twin studies and investigations into the relationship between schizophrenia-like psychosis and cerebral dysfunction are of considerable interest. Refinement in twin studies has led to less emphasis being placed upon the genetic factor, but the pitfalls surrounding twin techniques, especially with regard to monozygous pairs and the similarity of their environment, have led Penrose (1971) to the opinion that twin study ‘is especially useful, not for genetical researches but in assessing the effects of environmental influences which lead to discordance in identical twin pairs'.

Type
Abstract
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 122 , Issue 571 , June 1973 , pp. 675 - 677
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1973 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davison, K., and Bagley, C. R. (1969). ‘Schizophrenialike psychosis associated with organic disorders of the central nervous system: a review of the literature’, in Current Problems in Neuropsychiatry (ed. Harrington, ). British Journal of Psychiatry Special Publication No. 4, 113–4.Google Scholar
Penrose, L. S. (1971). ‘Psychiatric genetics.’ Psychological Medicine, 1, 265–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, S. M., and Penrose, L. S. (1955). ‘Monozygotic and dizygotic twin diagnosis.’ Annals of Human Genetics, 19, 273–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.