Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:51:14.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparison of “Offender” and “Non-Offender” Male Patients Admitted to the State Hospital, Carstairs between 1966 and 1975

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

A. V. M. Hughson
A. V. M. Hughson*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Glasgow, Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0AA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A comparison was made between ‘offender’ (part V) and ‘non-offender’ (part IV) male patients admitted to the State Hospital, Carstairs, over a ten year period. More than a third of the ‘non-offender’ group had at some time in the past been in penal institutions. During their stay in the State Hospital, the ‘non-offender’ patients were more disturbed in behaviour than their ‘offender’ counterparts, and relatively fewer of them were discharged during the period of study.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 139 , Issue 5 , November 1981 , pp. 431 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bluglass, R. (1978) Regional secure units and interim security for psychiatric patients. British Medical Journal, i, 489–93.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. W. & Mitchell, G. (1975) A fifteen year review of female admissions to Carstairs State Hospital. British Journal of Psychiatry, 127, 448–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, G. & Murphy, J. B. (1975) A survey of female patients in Carstairs State Hospital. British Journal of Psychiatry, 127, 445–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Orr, J. H. (1978) The imprisonment of mentally disordered offenders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 133, 194–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.