Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:36:43.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparative Study of Pse/Catego and Diasika: Two Psychiatric Computer Diagnostic Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

W. Schmid ,
T. Bronisch  and
D. Von Zerssen
W. Schmid
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Psychiatrie, Kraepelinstr. 10, 8000 München 40, Germany
T. Bronisch
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Psychiatrie, Kraepelinstr. 10, 8000 München 40, Germany
D. Von Zerssen*
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Psychiatrie, Kraepelinstr. 10, 8000 München 40, Germany
*
∗Correspondence.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An unselected series of 100 psychiatric in-patients was independently diagnosed by two clinicians using the PSE and by two computer diagnostic systems: CATEGO based on PSE items and DiaSiKa based on AMDP items. The computer programs are compared with respect to their diagnostic agreement with the clinical diagnoses.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 141 , Issue 3 , September 1982 , pp. 292 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1982 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1981) DSM III. Diagnostic and statistical manual of the mental disorders, 3rd edition. Washington: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Methodik und Dokumentation in der psychiatrie (amdp) (1979) Das AMDP-System. Manual zur Dokumentation psychiatrischer Befunde. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Bobon, D. P. (ed.) (1981) Le système AMDP, 2nd edition. Bruxelles: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Bronisch, T., Schmid, W. & von Cranach, M. (1982) Die diagnostische Reliabilität und Validität des PSE/CATEGO-Systems. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 238, 269–81.Google Scholar
Busch, H., von Cranach, M., Gulbinat, W., Renfordt, E. & Tegeler, J. (1980) Reliability of the AMDP system. Acta psychiatrica et neurologica Scandinavica, 62, 382–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. (1960) A coefficient of agreement of nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. E., Copeland, J. R. M., Brown, G. W., Harris, T. & Courlay, A. J. (1977) Further studies on interviewer training and inter-rater reliability of the Present State Examination (PSE). Psychological Medicine, 7, 517–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, J. E., Kendell, R. E., Gurland, B. J., Sharpe, L., Copeland, J. R. M. & Simon, R. (1972) Psychiatric diagnosis in New York and London: A comparative study of hospital admissions. Maudsley Monograph No 20. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
von Cranach, M. & Cooper, J. E. (1972) Changes in rating behavior during the learning of a standardized psychiatric interview. Psychological Medicine, 2, 373–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feighner, J. P., Robins, E., Guze, S. B., Woodruff, R. A., Winokur, G. & Munoz, R. (1972) Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 26, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleiss, J. L., Spitzer, R. L., Cohen, J. & Endicott, J. (1972) Three computer diagnosis methods compared. Archives of General Psychiatry, 27, 643–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guy, W. & Ban, T. A. (eds.) (to be published) The AMDP system. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendell, R. E., Everitt, B., Cooper, J. E., Sartorius, N. & David, M. E. (1968) The reliability of the ‘Present State Examination’. Social Psychiatry, 3, 123–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luria, R. E. & Berry, R. (1979) Reliability and descriptive validity of PSE syndromes. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36, 1187–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luria, R. E. & McHugh, P. R. (1974) Reliability and clinical utility of the ‘Wing’ Present State Examination. Archives of General Psychiatry, 30, 866–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
López-Ibor Aliño, J. J. (ed.) (1980) El sistema AMDP. Madrid: Grupo para El Progreso de la Psiquiatria.Google Scholar
Möller, H.-J. & von Zerssen, D. (1980) Probleme und Verbesserungsmöglichkeiten der psychiatrischen Diagnostik. In Evaluationsforschung in der Psychiatrie, pp 167–207 (ed. Biefang, S.). Stuttgart: Enke.Google Scholar
Mombour, W. (1972) Verfahren zur Standardisierung des psychopathologischen Befundes. Psychiatria Clinica, 5, 73–120 and 137-0-57.Google Scholar
Schmid, W., Castell, R., Mombour, W., Mittelsten Scheid, D. & von Zerssen, D. (1974) Die diagnostische übereinstimmung zwischen klinikera und dem DIAL-Programm. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 218, 339–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, R. L. & Endicott, J. (1968) DIAGNO: A computer program for psychiatric diagnosis utilizing the differential diagnostic procedure. Archives of General Psychiatry, 18, 746–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R. L. & Endicott, J. (1969) DIAGNO II: Further developments in a computer program for psychiatric diagnosis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 125 (suppl): 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J. & Robins, E., (1978) Research diagnostic criteria. Archives of General Psychiatry, 35, 773–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J., Cohen, J. & Fleiss, J. L. (1974) Constraints on the validity of computer diagnosis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 31, 197–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E. & Sartorius, N. (1974) The description and classification of psychiatric symptomatology: An instruction manual for the PSE and CATEGO system. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K., Nixon, J., von Cranach, M. & Strauss, A. (1977a) Further developments of the ‘Present State Examination’ and CATEGO system. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 224, 151–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, J. K., Nixon, J., Mann, S. A. & Leff, J. P. (1977b) Reliability of the PSE (9th ed.) used in a population study. Psychological Medicine, 7, 505–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Zerssen, D. (to be published) Die Diagnostische Sichtloch-Kartei (DiaSiKa)—ein einfaches Instrument zur Standardisierung der psychiatrischen Diagnostik.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.