Hodgins & Müller-Isberner (Reference Hodgins and Müller-Isberner2004) in their clinical implications assert that schizophrenia patients with antisocial behaviour ‘require cognitive–behavioural interventions aimed at changing antisocial behaviours...’, yet the paper itself can only quote evidence of effectiveness of these techniques in offenders who are not mentally ill (Reference McGuireMcGuire, 1995). It therefore seems unclear why they then suggest that these techniques will be effective in reducing antisocial behaviours in people with schizophrenia and should be regarded as ‘required’. Unfounded assumptions like these may be quoted by others referencing this paper and lead people to assume, mistakenly, an evidence base for this assertion. Providing cognitive–behavioural therapy to this client group may therefore provide no benefit but divert resources that may have benefited others. While I agree that reducing antisocial behaviour in this client group is desirable, we should not hasten to assume, in the absence of evidence, that cognitive–behavioural therapy will provide a panacea.
Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Taylor, Pamela J.
2006.
Delusional disorder and delusions: is there a risk of violence in social interactions about the core symptom?.
Behavioral Sciences & the Law,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 3,
p.
313.
Moulin, Valerie
Framorando, David
Gasser, Jacques
and
Dan-Glauser, Elise
2022.
The Link Between Cannabis Use and Violent Behavior in the Early Phase of Psychosis: The Potential Role of Impulsivity.
Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Vol. 13,
Issue. ,
Hodgins, Sheilagh
and
Moulin, Valérie
2022.
Le nouveau défi des services destinés aux personnes présentant un premier épisode de psychose : intégrer des interventions pour prévenir et réduire les agressions physiques.
Santé mentale au Québec,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 1,
p.
87.
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.