Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:43:09.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cognitive Functioning in Multiple Sclerosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

K. L. Jambor*
Affiliation:
The Isis Group of Hospitals, Oxford; Littlemore Hospital, Oxford

Extract

In previous studies the estimation of the incidence of intellectual changes in multiple sclerosis has varied from as low as 2 per cent. (Cottrell and Wilson, 1926) to as high as 72 per cent. (Ombredane, 1929). In order to establish the incidence accurately, the most satisfactory method would clearly be a long-term follow-up (covering lifetime) of a sample of multiple sclerosis patients. Any cross-sectional study would include patients in varying degrees of advancement of the disease, and patients found to be free of intellectual deficits at the time of investigation would not necessarily remain so. Also, the indirect psychometric assessment of intellectual loss is notoriously difficult, and the direct method of follow-up would give much more accurate results. The only direct study up to date has been that of Canter (1951), who found a highly significant (i.e. 13·48 points) loss on re-testing multiple sclerosis patients on the Army General Classification Test after a four-year period. Even after such a short period as six months he found slight losses on most Wechsler-Bellevue subtests, in contrast to an average gain of six full IQ points of the control group.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1969 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Briggs, P. (1960). “The validity of the WAIS performance subtests completed with one hand.” J. clin. Psychol., 16, 318.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brody, M. S. (1942). “The measurement of dementia.” J. ment. Sci., 88, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canter, A. H. (1951). “Direct and indirect measures of psychological deficit in MS.” J. gen. Psychol., 44, pages 3 and 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrell, S. S., and Kinnier Wilson, S. A. (1926). “The affective symptomatology of disseminated sclerosis.” J. Neurol. Psychopath., 7, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAlpine, D., Compston, N. D., and Lumsden, C. E. (1955). Multiple Sclerosis. E. and S. Livingstone, 215.Google ScholarPubMed
Ombredane, A. (1929). Sur les Troubles Mentaux de la Sclérose en Plaques. Thèse de Paris.Google Scholar
Pratt, R. T. C. (1951). “Psychiatric aspects of disseminated sclerosis.” J. Neurol, Neurosurg. Psychiat., 14, 326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surridge, D. (1969). “An investigation into some psychiatric aspects of multiple sclerosis”. Brit. J. Psychiat. 115, 749–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M., and Jambor, K. (1964). “Disorders of topographical and right-left orientation in adults compared with its acquisition in children.” Neuropsychologia, 2, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.