Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:54:47.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Classification and the British Glossary of Mental Disorders: Some Experience of its Use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

J. R. M. Copeland
J. R. M. Copeland*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, S.E.5 Bethlem Royal and Maudsley Hospitals
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A Glossary of Mental Disorders was published in 1968, prepared by the Registrar-General's Advisory Committee on Medical Nomenclature and Statistics. The document used as a basis the Eighth Edition of the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases (I.C.D.), Section V, which deals with mental disorders and mental subnormality. For the first time in this country the meaning of the categories listed in the I.D.C. are described, and the new Glossary stands beside the Second Edition of the American Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (D.S.M. II) which was also published in 1968. The psychiatrists working on the United States-United Kingdom Diagnostic Project at the Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, London, and the Psychiatric Institute, New York, made diagnoses according to the new Glossary descriptions on 820 hospital in-patients drawn from both sides of the Atlantic and interviewed using a standardized interview. The comments contained in this article are based on their experience.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 119 , Issue 551 , October 1971 , pp. 413 - 418
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1971 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1968). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 2nd Ed. (DSM-II). Publ. by the Amer. Psychiat. Association, Washington, D.C. 20009.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. A. (1968). ‘Psychiatric Diagnosis, the Eighth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases.’ Research Report No. 8. University of Aberdeen, Dept. of Mental Health.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M, Mock, J. E., and Erbaugh, J. K. (1962). ‘Reliability of psychiatric diagnosis: 2. A study of consistency of clinical judgements and ratings.’ Amer. J. Psychiat., 119, 351–7.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. E., Kendell, R. E., Gurland, B. J., Sartorius, N., and Farkas, T. (1969). ‘Cross-national study of diagnosis of the mental disorders: some results from the first comparative investigation.’ Amer. J. Psychiat., 125, Suppl. 21–9.Google Scholar
General Register Office (1968). A Glossary of Mental Disorders. Studies of Medical and Population Subjects No. 22. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Kendell, R. E., Everett, B., Cooper, J. E., Sartorius, N., and David, M. E. (1968). ‘The reliability of the Present State Examination.’ Social Psychiat., 3, 123–9.Google Scholar
Kendell, R. E., Everett, B., Cooper, J. E., Sartorius, N., Gourlay, A. J. (1970). ‘The clinical distinction between psychotic and neurotic depression.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 117, 257–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendell, R. E., Everett, B., Cooper, J. E., Sartorius, N., Sharpe, L., Cooper, J. E., Gurland, B. J., Gourlay, A. J., and Copeland, J. R. M. (1971). ‘The diagnostic criteria of American and British psychiatrists.’ Arch. gen. Psychiat. (in press).Google Scholar
Spitzer, R. L., and Wilson, P. T. (1969). ‘DSM II Revisited: a reply.’ Int. J. Psychiat., Vol. 7, No. 6, 421–6.Google Scholar
Stengel, E. (1959). Classification of Mental Disorders. Bull. World Health Organization, 21, 601–63.Google ScholarPubMed
Wing, J. K., Birley, J. L. T., Cooper, J. E., Graham, P., and Isaacs, A. D. (1967). ‘Reliability of a procedure for measuring and classifying “Present Psychiatric State”.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 113, 499–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.