Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:45:09.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The CIDI-Core Substance Abuse and Dependence Questions: Cross-cultural and Nosological Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

L. B. Cottler ,
L. N. Robins ,
B. F. Grant ,
J. Blaine ,
L. H. Towle ,
H.-U. Wittchen ,
N. Sartorius  and
Participants in the Who/Adamha Field Trial
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The CIDI is a fully standardised, structured interview for the assessment of psychiatric disorders according to DSM–III–R and proposed ICD–10 criteria. The development of this interview has been the collaborative effort of researchers from 18 sites around the world. In a field trial to test the cross-cultural acceptability and reliability of the questions, there was found to be high acceptance and excellent reliability for the substance use questions, problems with the lengthy alcohol section, and difficulties translating relevant substance use concepts into different languages. There is therefore room for further improvement in the substance-related questions. There proved to be differences between ICD–10 and DSM–III–R regarding substance abuse and dependence disorders.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 159 , Issue 5 , November 1991 , pp. 653 - 658
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The field trial participants included, in addition to those listed above: A. C. Altamura, G. Andrews, J. D. Burke, P. R. Dingemans, A. Droux, A. Farmer, J. E. Helzer, A. Janca, J. P. Lepine, C. T. Miranda, C. Pull, D. A. Regier, M. Rubio-Stipec, I. Sandanger, R. Smeets, G. Tacchini, M. Tehrani, J. E. Tipp, C. Allgulander, J. Halikas, G. Ingebrigsten, M. Isaac, P. L. Jenkins, G. E. Kuehne, G. Lyketsos, W. Maier, J. Kraus, Liang Shu.

References

American Psychiatric Association (1980) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn) (DSM–III). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn, revised) (DSM–III–R). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Burke, J. D. (1986) Diagnostic categorization by the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS): a comparison with other methods of assessment. In Mental Disorders in the Community. Findings from Psychiatric Epidemiology (eds Barret, J. & Rose, R. M.), pp. 255–285. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cottler, L. B., Robins, L. N. & Helzer, J. E. (1989) The reliability of the CIDI-SAM: a comprehensive substance abuse interview. British Journal of Addiction, 84, 810–814.Google Scholar
Cottler, L. B. & Keating, S. (1990) Operationalization of alcohol and drug dependence criteria by means of a structured interview. In Recent Developments in Alcoholism (ed. Gallantes, M.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Cottler, L. B., Helzer, J. E. & Mager, D., et al (1991) Diagnostic agreement between DSM–III and DSM–III–R substance abuse disorders. Alcohol Abuse and Dependence (in press).Google Scholar
Edwards, G. & Gross, M. M. (1976) Alcohol dependence: provisional description of a clinical syndrome. British Medical Journal, i, 1058–1061.Google Scholar
Farmer, A. E., Katz, R., McGiffin, P., et al (1987) A comparison between the Present State Examination and the Composite International Diagnostic Interviews. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 1064–1068.Google Scholar
Feighner, J. P., Robins, E., Guze, S. B., et al (1972) Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 26, 57–63.Google Scholar
Helzer, J. E., Robins, L. N., Croughan, J. L., et al (1981) The Renard Diagnostic Interview: its reliability and procedural validity with physicians and lay interviewers. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 393–398.Google Scholar
Robins, L. N. (1989) Diagnostic grammar and assessment: translating criteria into questions. The Validity of Diagnosis (eds Robins, L. & Barrett, J.). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Robins, L. N., Helzer, J. E., Croughan, J., et al (1981) The National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Its history, characteristics, and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 381–389.Google Scholar
Robins, L. N., Wing, J., Wittchen, H.-U., et al (1988) The Composite International Diagnostic Interview: an epidemiologic instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 1069–1077.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robins, L. N., Cottler, L. B. & Babor, T. (1990) The CIDI Substance Abuse Module. St Louis: Washington University.Google Scholar
Semler, G. (1990) Reliabilität und Validität des Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Regensburg: Roderer Verlag.Google Scholar
Semler, G., Wittchen, H.-U., Joschke, K., et al (1987) Test-retest reliability of a standardized psychiatric interview (DIS/CIDI). European Archives of Psychiatry and the Neurological Sciences, 236, 214–222.Google Scholar
Semler, G., Wittchen, H.-U. & Zaudig, M. (1988) The test–retest reliability of the German version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview on RDC diagnoses and symptom level. In International Classification in Psychiatry, Unity and Diversity (eds Mezziah, J. E. & von Cranach, M.), pp. 221–234. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E. & Sartorius, N. (1974) The Description and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms. An Instruction Manual for the PSE and CATEGO System. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wittchen, H.-U., Burke, J. D., Semler, G., et al (1989) Recall and dating reliability of psychiatric interview (CIDI/DIS). Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 437–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittchen, H.-U., Robins, L. N., Cottler, L., et al (1990) Interrater reliability of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Results from the multicenter WHO/ADAMHA field trials (wave I). In Psychiatry – A World Perspective, vol. 1 (ed. Stefanis, C. N.), pp. 125 132. International Congress Series Vol. 900. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1987) Composite International Diagnostic Interview, Core Version 0.0. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1989a) ICD–10, Chapter V, Mental and Behavioral Disorders (including disorders of psychological development) -Diagnostic Criteria for Research. Draft for field trials. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1989b) Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.