Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T16:07:04.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chronicity and the General Health Questionnaire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

M. E. Goodchild  and
Paul Duncan-Jones
M. E. Goodchild
Affiliation:
National Health and Medical Research Council Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Australian National University, P.O. Box 4, Canberra City, ACT 2601, Australia
Paul Duncan-Jones*
Affiliation:
National Health and Medical Research Council Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Australian National University, P.O. Box 4, Canberra City, ACT 2601, Australia
*
∗Correspondence.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

We propose a new scoring for Goldberg's (1972) General Health Questionnaire. We argue that the response ‘no more than usual’, to an item describing pathology, should be treated as an indicator of chronic illness rather than of good health, and we score these responses accordingly. We give evidence that this set of responses is associated with other measures of neurotic illness, and that the revised scoring provides a better prediction of caseness than the conventional scoring. The revised scoring is more strongly associated with trait neuroticism, and is more stable in repeated measurement. It is recommended in preference to the conventional scoring for most research and epidemiological purposes.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 146 , Issue 1 , January 1985 , pp. 55 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belson, W. A. (1962) Studies in Readership. London: Business Publications.Google Scholar
Belson, W. A. (1981) The Design and Understanding of Survey Questions. England: Gower.Google Scholar
Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E. & Holland, P. W. (1975) Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. (1963) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rank McNally College.Google Scholar
Chan, D. W. & Chan, T. S. C. (1983) Reliability, validity and the structure of the General Health Questionnaire in a Chinese context. Psychological Medicine, 13, 363–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan-Jones, P. (1981) The natural history of neurosis: Probability models. In: ‘What is a Case? The Problem of Definition in Psychiatric Community Surveys’, (eds. Wing, J. K., Bebbington, P. & Robins, L. N.) London: Grant McIntyre.Google Scholar
Efron, B. (1978) Regression and ANOVA with zero-one data: Measures of residual variation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, 113–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964) Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. London: London University Press.Google Scholar
Finlay-Jones, R. A. & Murphy, E. (1979) Severity of psychiatric disorder and the 30–item General Health Questionnaire. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 609–16.Google Scholar
Foulds, G. A. (1976) The Hierarchical Nature of Personal Illness. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. (1972) The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. Maudsley Monograph, No. 21. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. (1978) Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
Goodman, L. A. (1965) On the statistical analysis of mobility tables. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 564–85.Google Scholar
Goodman, L. A. (1979) Multiplicative models for the analysis of occupational mobility tables and other kinds of crossclassification tables. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 804–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, W. D. (1963) Double interview. In: 'New Developments in Research. London: Market Research Society with the Oakwood Press.Google Scholar
Harding, T. W. (1976) Validating a method of psychiatric case identification in Jamaica. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation, 54, 225–31.Google Scholar
Henderson, S., Byrne, D. G. & Duncan-Jones, P. (1981) Neurosis and the Social Enviroment. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jones, F. L. & Pittelkow, Y. E. (1983) Analysis of occupational mobility tables using GLIM. GUM Newsletter, 7, 34–6.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, A. M. (1976) Foundations of Epidemiology. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Munoz, P. E., Vazquez, J. L., Pastrana, E., Rodriguez, F. & Oneca, C. (1978) Study of the validity of Goldberg's 60-item GHQ in its Spanish version. Social Psychiatry, 13, 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wing, J. K. (1976) A technique for studying psychiatric morbidity in inpatient and outpatient series and in general population samples. Psychological Medicine, 6, 665–72.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K. Cooper, J. & Sartorius, N. (1974) The Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yerushalmy, J. (1947) Statistical problems in assessing methods of medical diagnosis, with special reference to X-ray techniques. Public Health Reports, 62, 1432–99.Google ScholarPubMed
Zung, W. W. K. (1965) A self-rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 12, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.