Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:44:48.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in Self-Rating of Symptoms: A Comparison of Questionnaire Graphic Scales with Test Cards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

A. Bedford ,
A. Edington  and
R. Kellner
A. Bedford
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Warlingham Park Hospital, Warlingham, Surrey CR3 9YR
A. Edington
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Winwick Hospital, Winwick, Warrington, Cheshire WA2 8RR
R. Kellner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Veterans Administration Hospital, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Forty-five in-patients, with primary diagnoses of neurosis or personality disorder, completed the test cards and booklet versions of the Symptom Rating Test—Day (SRT). In order to facilitate retroactive interference the Manifest Anxiety Scale (MAS) and the Maudsley Personality Inventory (MPI) were administered between the two forms of the SRT. On the next day the patients were given the SRT (Week). The initial SRT, MAS and MPI testing was repeated one week later.

On the assumption that positional set is an important consideration predictions were made as to the expected differences between the test cards and booklet modes of SRT administration.

The results add support to the practical use of the SRT in its more recent standardized format.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 134 , Issue 1 , January 1979 , pp. 108 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bedford, A., McIver, D. & Pearson, P. R. (1978) A further test of Foulds' personality and personal illness differentiae in a psychiatric group. Psychological Medicine (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1946) Response set and test validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 6, 475–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1959) Manual of the Maudsley Personality Inventory. London: University of London Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1954) Psychometric Methods. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kellner, R. (1971) Improvement criteria in drug trials with neurotic patients. Part 1. Psychological Medicine, 1, 416–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellner, R. (1972) Improvement criteria in drug trials with neurotic patients. Part 2. Psychological Medicine, 2, 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellner, R. & Sheffield, B. F. (1973) A self-rating scale of distress. Psychological Medicine, 3, 88–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellner, R., Kelly, A. V. & Sheffield, B. F. (1968) The assessment of changes in anxiety in a drug trial: a comparison of methods. British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 863–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipman, R. S., Cole, J. O., Park, L. D. & Rickles, K. (1965) Sensitivity of symptom and non-symptom focussed criteria of outpatient drug efficacy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 122, 24–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, L. C., Uhlenhuth, E. H., Lipman, R. S., Rickles, K. & Fisher, S. (1965) A comparison of doctor and patient improvement rating in a drug (meprobamate) trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 111, 535–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. A. (1953) A personality scale of manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 285–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.