Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:31:35.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Capital Costs of Alternative Residential Facilities for Mentally Handicapped People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

David Felce*
Affiliation:
Health Care Evaluation Research Team, Dawn House, Sleepers Hill, Winchester, Hants SO22 4NG

Summary

This paper examines the capital costs and accommodation provided in three different types of residential facility for mentally handicapped people—a large campus hospital, a small campus hospital and a network of individually-sited hospital units. The findings do not indicate any economy arising from increased size, or from centralization of facilities on a single site. These findings, together with the other research cited, have implications for the design of future residential services.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balla, D. A. (1976) Relationship of institution size to quality of care: A review of the literature. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 81, 2, 117–24.Google Scholar
Conley, R. W. (1973) The Economics of Mental Retardation. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (DHSS) (1971) Better Services for the Mentally Handicapped. London: H.M.S.O. Google Scholar
Felce, D., Kushlick, A. & Mansell, J. (1980a) Evaluation of alternative residential facilities for the severely mentally handicapped in Wessex: Client engagement. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 3, 1, 1318.Google Scholar
Felce, D., Kushlick, A. & Mansell, J. (1980b) Evaluation of alternative residential facilities for the severely mentally handicapped in Wessex: Staff recruitment and continuity. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 3, 1, 31–5.Google Scholar
Felce, D., Lunt, B. & Kushlick, A. (1980) Evaluation of alternative residential facilities for the severely mentally handicapped in Wessex: Family contact. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 3, 1, 1923.Google Scholar
Felce, D., Mansell, J. & Kushlick, A. (1980a) Evaluation of alternative residential facilities for the severely mentally handicapped in Wessex: Staff performance. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 3, 1, 2530.Google Scholar
Felce, D., Mansell, J. & Kushlick, A. (1980b) Evaluation of alternative residential facilities for the severely mentally handicapped in Wessex: Revenue costs. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 3, 1, 43–7.Google Scholar
Kushlick, A., Smith, J. & Felce, D. (1980) Report to the Department of Health and Social Security Research Liaison Group (Mental Handicap). Winchester: Health Care Evaluation Research Team. Report No. 156.Google Scholar
Smith, J., Glossop, C. & Kushlick, A. (1980) Evaluation of alternative residential facilities for the severely mentally handicapped in Wessex: Client progress. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 3, 1, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessex Regional Hospital Board (WRHB) (1966) The report of the working party on the provision of further accommodation for the mentally subnormal. Winchester: W.R.H.B. Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.