Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T14:52:53.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

British Phenomenological and Psychopathological Concepts: A Comparative Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Peter Berner  and
Bernd Küfferle
Peter Berner
Affiliation:
Vienna, Austria
Bernd Küfferle
Affiliation:
Psychiatric University Clinic, Vienna, Austria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For a foreign observer who has been trained in German and French psychopathology, British psychiatry is very attractive at first glance for a number of reasons. Its eclectic and principally non-theoretical approach (Cooper, 1975), characterized by an open acceptance of foreign concepts and by the tendency to question traditional structures and hypotheses and to test them by means of statistical methods, appears most impressive. The substantial contribution British authors have made toward the development of structured tools in psychopathology, like for instance the Present State Examination or the Hamilton Rating Scale in order to facilitate such a statistical evaluation, which reflects clearly the inheritance of Sir Francis Galton, is also a cause of sincere admiration. The European observer realizes furthermore that the British approach is rooted mainly in continental, especially in German, clinical psychiatry, and is not as heavily influenced by psychodynamic theories as, for instance, the American schools were, at least until recently. This provides him with a comfortable feeling of familiarity and he is not inclined to question certain British tenets until his involvement progresses and he becomes aware of the comparative lack of attention paid by British schools to some of the fundamentals of continental psychopathology.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 140 , Issue 6 , June 1982 , pp. 558 - 565
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1982 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berner, P., Gabriel, E. & Schanda, H. (1980) Non-schizophrenic paranoid syndromes. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 6, No 4, 627–32.Google Scholar
Berner, P. (1981) The demarcation between schizophrenia and cyclothymia. Encephalos, 18, 147–57.Google Scholar
Carpenter, W. T., Strauss, J. S. & Muleh, S. (1973) Are there pathognomonic symptoms in schizophrenia? Archives of General Psychiatry, 28, 847–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, J. E. (1975) Concepts of schizophrenia in the United States of America and in Great Britain. In Studies of Schizophrenia, (ed. Lader, M. H.). British Journal of Psychiatry, Special Publication No 10. Ashford, Kent: Headley Brothers Google Scholar
Fish, F. (1967) Clinical Psychopathology. Bristol: John Wright.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1976) (ed.) Fish's Schizophrenia. Bristol: John Wright Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1967) In Clinical Psychopathology, (ed. Fish, F.). Bristol: John Wright Google Scholar
Janzarik, W. (1959) Dynamische Grundkonstellationen in endogenen Psychosen. Berlin, Göttingen, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Jaspers, K. (1913–49) Allgemeines Psychopathologie. Transl. 1963 as General Psychopathology. Manchester: University Press Google Scholar
Kendell, R. E. (1976) The classification of depression: a review of contemporary confusion. British Journal of Psychiatry, 129, 15–28.Google Scholar
Kräupl Taylor, F. (1966) Psychopathology. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Kräupl Taylor, F. (1979) Psychopathology. Sunbury-on-Thames: Quartermain House.Google Scholar
Marks, I. M. (1970) The classification of phobic disorders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 116, 377–86.Google Scholar
Mentzos, St. (1967) Mischzustände und mischbildhafte phasische Psychosen. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.Google Scholar
Nunn, C. M. H. (1979) Mixed affective states and the natural history of manic-depressive psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 153–60.Google Scholar
Pope, H. G. & Lipinski, J. F. (1978) Diagnosis in schizophrenia and manic-depressive illness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 35, 811–28.Google Scholar
Roth, M. & McClelland, H. (1979) The relationship of “nuclear” and “atypical” psychoses. Psychiatria Clinica, 12, 23–54.Google Scholar
Scharfetter, C. (1980) General Psychopathology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, K. (1959) Clinical Psychopathology. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Slater, E. (1965) Diagnosis of “hysteria”. British Medical Journal, i, 1395–9.Google Scholar
Slater, E. & Roth, M. (1977) Clinical Psychiatry. London: Baillière Tindall.Google Scholar
Tölle, R. (1980) Die Entwicklung der deutschen Psychiatric im 20. Jahrhundert. In Psychologie des 20. Jahrhunderts, (ed. Peters, U. H.). Band 10, 13–23. Zürich: Kindler Google Scholar
Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E. & Sartorius, N. (1973) Present State Examination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Wing, J. K. & Nixon, J. (1975) Discriminating symptoms in schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 32, 853–9.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K. Nixon, J. von Cranach, M. & Strauss, A. (1977) Further developments of the Present State Examination and CATEGO-system. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 224, 151–60.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.