Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T18:31:11.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application Group: Broadening the Patient Experience in a Psychiatric Organization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Lowell Cooper
Lowell Cooper*
Affiliation:
2218 Sacramento Street, Berkeley, California 94702
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Tavistock conference model of Group Relations Training, described in some depth by Rioch (1970) and O'Conner (1971), provides participants with a focus on the problems of leadership and authority as they develop and emerge in a variety of relatively unstructured group contexts within a time-limited laboratory setting. The major conference experience involves participation in ‘here and now’ groups with the use of staff in a consultative role, i.e. the staff function being to focus exclusively on the covert or unconscious processes in the group. So the usual consultant role involves no comments to individuals but a rigorous focus on the dynamics of the group as a whole; a role which has been described in more clinical settings by Bion (1968), Coffey (1966) and Ezriel (1950). ‘One of the major aims of the conferences is to contribute to people's ability to form serious work groups committed to the performance of clearly defined tasks …. A second major aim … is the development of more responsible leadership and fellowship in group life’ (Rioch, 1970, p. 347).

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 124 , Issue 580 , March 1974 , pp. 247 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1974 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bion, W. R. (1968). Experiences in Groups. New York: Basic Books, Inc. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Coffey, H. S. (1966). ‘Group psychotherapy’, in An Introduction to Clinical Psychology (eds. Berg, I. A. and Pennington, L. A.), pp. 624–52. New York: Ronald Press Co.Google Scholar
Cooper, L. (1971). ‘Systematic use of groups in an acute psychiatric unit.’ Group Analysis, 4, 152–6.Google Scholar
Cooper, L. and Lofgren, L. (1972). ‘Clinical use of Bion's group-process model.’ (Unpublished manuscript, available upon request.)Google Scholar
Edelson, M. (1970). Sociotherapy and Psychotherapy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ezriel, H. (1950). ‘A psychoanalytic approach to group treatment.’ Brit. J. med. Psychol., 23, 59–74.Google Scholar
Lofgren, L. B. (1972). ‘Organizational design and therapeutic effect’, in Memorial Volume to Rice, A. K., Task and Organization. London: Tavistock Institute. (In press.)Google Scholar
O'Conner, G. (1971). ‘The Tavistock method of group study’, in Techniques of Therapy (ed. Wasserman, J. H.), pp. 110–15. New York: Grune and Stratton, Inc.Google Scholar
Rice, A. K. (1963). The Enterprise and Its Environment. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Rice, A. K. (1965). Learning for Leadership. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Rioch, M. J. (1970). ‘Group relations: rationale and technique.’ Int. J. Group Psychotherapy, 20, 340–55.Google Scholar
Tavistock Institute of Human Relations (1972). Authority and Leadership. A Working Conference. April.Google Scholar
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General Systems Theory. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.