Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:03:01.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Investigation of Conceptual Process and Pattern Change in a Psychotherapy Group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Fay Fransella
Affiliation:
M.R.C. team, Department of Psychology, Bexley Hospital, Dartford Heath, Kent
M. P. Joyston-Bechal
Affiliation:
Shenley Hospital, Shenley, Herts

Extract

In a review of the 1967 group psychotherapy literature, MacLennan and Levy (1968) record that nearly 300 papers were published in that one year. Unfortunately, this proliferation does not reflect any great increase in the knowledge of group psychotherapy processes. There are plenty of original ideas, but these are almost totally unsupported by systematic theory and research. Where theoretical ideas have been used, they have been lifted from the sphere of individual psychotherapy and applied unmodified to group psychotherapy. The research has largely been concerned with determining such things as the most efficient group structure; who talks to whom about what; and what grammatical forms are used.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1971 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bannister, D. (1960). ‘Conceptual structure in thoughtdisordered schizophrenics.’ Journal of Mental Science, 106, 1230–49.Google Scholar
Bannister, D. (1963). ‘The genesis of schizophrenic thought-disorder: a serial invalidation hypothesis.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 199, 680–6.Google Scholar
Bannister, D. and Fransella, F. (1966). ‘A grid test of schizophrenic thought-disorder.’ British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 96102.Google Scholar
Bannister, D. and Mair, J. M. M. (1968). The Evaluation of Personal Constructs. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bernardez, T. (1969). ‘The role of the observer in group psychotherapy.’ International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 19, 234–9.Google Scholar
Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in Groups. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Foulkes, S. H., and Anthony, E. J. (1965). Group Psychotherapy. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Fransella, F., and Adams, B. (1965). ‘An illustration of the use of repertory grid technique in a clinical setting.’ British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 5162.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Landfield, A. W., and Nawas, M. M. (1964). ‘Psychotherapeutic improvement as a function of communication and adoption of therapist's values.’ Journal of Counselling Psychology, 11, 336–41.Google Scholar
Levin, S., and Kanter, S. (1964). ‘Some general considerations in the supervision of beginning group psychotherapists.’ International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 14, 318–31.Google Scholar
Maclennan, B. W., and Levy, N. (1968). ‘The group psychotherapy literature, 1967.’ International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 18, 375401.Google Scholar
Marks, I. M., Gelder, M. G., and Edwards, G. (1968). ‘Hypnosis and desensitization for phobias: a controlled prospective trial.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 1263–74.Google Scholar
Parloff, M. B. (1967). ‘A view from the incomplete bridge: Group process and outcome.’ International Journal of Psychotherapy, 17, 236–42.Google Scholar
Ryle, A., and Lunghi, M. E. (1969). ‘The measurement of relevant change after psychotherapy: use of repertory grid testing.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 115, 12971304.Google Scholar
Slater, P. (1965). The Principal Components of a Repertory Grid. London: Vincent Andrews and Co.Google Scholar
Slater, P. (1968). ‘A DELTA programme for comparing repertory grids.’ Biometrics Unit, Maudsley Hospital, London.Google Scholar
Truax, C. B., and Wargo, D. G. (1966). ‘Psychotherapeutic encounters that change behaviour: for better or for worse.’ American Journal of Psychotherapy, 20, 499520.Google Scholar
Zung, W. W. K. (1965). ‘A self-rating depression scale.’ Archives of General Psychiatry, 12, 6370.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.