Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:16:57.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Amygdala volume in schizophrenia: post-mortem study and review of magnetic resonance imaging findings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Steven A. Chance
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, UK
Margaret M. Esiri
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, UK
Timothy J. Crow
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Claims that schizophrenia is a disease of the limbic system have been strengthened by meta-analyses of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies finding reduced hippocampus and amygdala volumes. Some post-mortem studies do not find these abnormalities.

Aims

To assess the volume of the amygdala in a series of brains post-mortem.

Method

Amygdala volume was estimated using point-counting in both hemispheres of the brains of 10 male and 8 female patients with schizophrenia, and a comparison group of 9 males and 9 females.

Results

No significant reduction of amygdala volume was found.

Conclusions

Significant volume reduction of the amygdala is not a consistent feature of schizophrenia; findings from early MRI studies using coarse delineation methods may introduce bias to subsequent meta-analyses.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2002 

The limbic system has been suggested to be a possible focus of pathological change in schizophrenia (Reference Torrey and PetersonTorrey & Peterson, 1974; Reference BogertsBogerts, 1997). It is plausible that symptoms of schizophrenia such as inappropriate or flattened affect might relate to a change in the structure of the amygdala and its connections (Reference Benes and BerrettaBenes & Berretta, 2000). Stimulating or damaging the amygdala can induce a range of symptoms (Reference Torrey and PetersonTorrey & Peterson, 1974), and schizophrenia-like psychoses have been associated with epileptic foci in the temporal lobe (Reference Slater and BeardSlater & Beard, 1963). There is disagreement between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies and a smaller number of studies in which amygdala volume has been assessed in post-mortem material. A consensus from MRI studies suggests a 5-10% reduction of the amygdala in schizophrenia. However, post-mortem planimetry studies are equivocal. This study aimed to clarify whether the MRI interpretation of amygdala reduction in schizophrenia is apparent in post-mortem tissue, using unbiased methods of estimating volume.

METHOD

Sample

Formalin-fixed brain tissue was used post-mortem from subjects who were selected on the basis of the assessment of clinical notes by a consultant psychiatrist (T. J. C. or Dr S. J. Cooper, Belfast). The DSM—IV (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) criteria for schizophrenia and schizo-affective disorder were used in the selection of cases of schizophrenia. Comparison group brains were collected prospectively from individuals who had died without a history of neuropsychiatric disorder, and whose next of kin had given consent for their tissues to be used in medical research. Pathological assessment of tissue samples was carried out by a consultant neuropathologist (M. M. E. or Dr B. McDonald, Oxford), and cases with significant neurological disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease, were excluded using the criteria of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (Reference Mirra, Heyman and McKeelMirra et al, 1991).

Subsequent to sectioning and staining, the series consisted of 36 cases, comprising 10 men and 8 women with schizophrenia, and a comparison group of 9 men and 9 women.

The degree of neuroleptic medication received during life was assessed from case notes, and categorised as ‘little’, ‘average’ or ‘much’. This was based on a clinician's (T. J. C. or S. A. C.) judgement on the basis of the available clinical records, the variability of information available precluding a more quantitative estimation. A three-section categorisation of causes of death indicates that 14 subjects died of cardiac causes, 9 of respiratory causes and 12 of ‘other’ causes. Of these, 22 deaths were prolonged and 13 were sudden. One subject died of uncertain causes. Other demographic details and potentially confounding variables, including age of symptom onset, duration of illness, age at death, post-mortem interval and fixation time, were noted for statistical analysis (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic variables and details of the brain collection for the amygdala study

Variable Men Women
Comparison group (n=9) Schizophrenia group (n=10) Comparison group (n=9) Schizophrenia group (n=8)
Age at onset (years)
Mean NA 28.5 NA 34.41
s.d. (range) 7.7 (21-42) 11.3 (17-47)
Duration of illness (years)
Mean NA 26.5 NA 40.31
s.d. (range) 14.3 (1-44) 13 (26-64)
Age at death (years)
Mean 68.9 55.0 70.8 75.8
s.d. (range) 11.0 (40-80) 13.2 (29-69) 14.3 (48-90) 13.8 (48-91)
Post-mortem interval (hours)
Mean 42.9 42.01 46.7 39.8
s.d. (range) 31.8 (10-98) 34.0 (6-113) 26.4 (19-104) 39.2 (10-128)
Fixation period (months)
Mean 25.3 46.3 28.0 67.6
s.d. (range) 15.9 (1-53) 22.4 (20-91) 17.7 (3-61) 13.6 (44-85)
Brain volume (cm3)
Mean 1144 1191 982 893
s.d. (range) 115 (995-1290) 104 (994-1378) 144 (846-1296) 144 (641-1087)

Tissue preparation

Following removal of the leptomeninges and brain-stem, and bisection of the brain, the temporal lobes were removed from the rest of the hemispheres at the posterior end of the sylvian fissure. The temporal lobe was cut into slices 5 mm thick along its anteroposterior axis. Embedding the slices in paraffin resulted in blocks of tissue approximately 3 mm thick owing to shrinkage. Blocks containing the amygdala were exhaustively sectioned from a position posterior to, and random with respect to, the posterior border of the amygdala. For a structure with a regular shape such as the amygdala, a sample of approximately 10 sections should be adequate for the estimation of volume (Reference Gundersen and JensenGundersen & Jensen, 1987). Selecting sections 25 μm thick with an interslice distance of 650 μm provided about 8-12 sections per amygdala. The sections were counterstained with Luxol fast blue, a myelin stain useful for picking out fibre tracts, and cresyl violet, which stains Nissl's substance in cell bodies (Fig. 1) (reagents obtained from Raymond A. Lamb Ltd, Eastbourne, UK).

Fig. 1 Cross-section of the amygdala and hippocampus. Staining with Luxol fast blue and cresyl violet results in dark staining of areas containing predominantly white matter fibre tracts and lighter staining of nuclei-containing cell bodies. The amygdala lies superior to and overlaps the hippocampus.

Measurement

A Cavalieri estimate of volume for each amygdala was obtained by stereological point-counting within the bounds of the amygdala on all sections in which it appeared. A 4-mm2 point density grid printed on acetate was laid over each cross-section and viewed under a dissecting microscope × 7 magnification (Fig. 2). Each point represented a volume of 10.8 mm3 (4 mm × 4 mm × 0.675 mm). Three placements of the grid, each time in a random orientation, were used to obtain a mean count for each section. The total count was multiplied by the volume represented by each point for an estimate of total volume. The most anterior section containing the hippocampus and the most anterior section containing the temporal horn were also noted. This enabled a calculation to be made of the percentage of amygdala volume overlapping with each of those structures along the axis of the temporal lobe.

Fig. 2 The black crosses of the acetate counting grid appear large when superimposed over a section under a × 7 magnification. Points falling within the structure of interest such as the amygdala grey matter (circled) are counted.

All measures were performed by the same researcher (S. A. C.) who was blind to the diagnosis and gender of the cases. Left, right and mean amygdala volumes were obtained.

Pilot study

A pilot study was used to determine the grid size of points and the number of counts per section required for a satisfactory estimate of amygdala volume. Point counts were made for each of three different grid sizes, varying the number of recounts. Trial grid sizes had interpoint distances of 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm, respectively. The 4-mm2 grid yielded a total point count of up to about 75 points per amygdala. Three counts of this grid gave a coefficient of error of 0.04, which was deemed satisfactory.

Reliability

The volume was estimated twice for 10 randomly selected amygdalas to test intrarater reliability. This provided an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.94, suggesting that the reliability of this measure was satisfactory.

Statistics

Statistical analyses were carried out using the software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 9.0 (SPSS, 1998). Unfortunately, for some amygdalas, insufficient tissue was available to provide a systematically random sample of total volume. This was due to an idiosyncratic tissue response to embedding procedures in some tissue blocks which resulted in unsatisfactory sections in a few amygdalas and prohibited their inclusion. Consequently, three cases provided volumetric data only for the right side and four cases only for the left side. Since a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) would exclude all seven cases with one side missing, an alternative univariate ANOVA was used to test the mean of both sides for each case, replaced by the value for just one side in cases that did not have both. This approach was used to test for the between-subject effects of diagnosis and gender. A repeated-measures ANOVA was still applied to test the within-subject effects of side using those cases that had data for both sides. In addition, an asymmetry statistic was calculated for these cases: (R—L)/(R+L) × 100, where R andL are the values for the right and left sides respectively.

The influence of potentially confounding variables — age at death, post-mortem interval and fixation time — for all cases were examined as variables in separate ANOVAs of groups selected by gender and/or diagnosis. Lifetime medication of the patients with schizophrenia was examined as a factor in ANOVA of the measured variables. Clinical information was felt to be unsatisfactory for correlating symptoms or sub-syndromes with data. All variables, including covariates, fitted with a normal distribution as tested by a Kolmogorov—Smirnov goodness-of-fit test (Reference ZarZar, 1984) for each gender and diagnosis group. Homogeneity of variance of the measured variables between groups was accepted after testing with a Box's M test (Reference Glantz and SlinkerGlantz & Slinker, 2000) before each ANOVA.

RESULTS

The measurements obtained are summarised in Table 2 and Fig. 3.

Fig. 3 No difference in amygdala volume was found between the study groups.

Table 2 Amygdala measurements in the post-mortem study group. Values are actual measured values uncorrected for tissue shrinkage

Variable Men Women
Comparison group mean (s.d.) Schizophrenia group mean (s.d.) Comparison group mean (s.d.) Schizophrenia group mean (s.d.)
Amygdala volume (mm3)
Left 686.5 (165.2) n=8 714.8 (91.9) n=9 628.5 (219.3) n=9 586.6 (138.4) n=7
Right 607.8 (82.9) n=8 721.2 (114.0) n=9 596.0 (186.5) n=9 545.1 (161.1) n=6
Mean amygdala volume (mm3) 643.4 (107.5) n=9 720.9 (92.7) n=10 612.3 (182.3) n=9 604.9 (155.0) n=8
Amygdala symmetry ([R-L]/[R+L] × 100) -4.5 (11.4) n=7 -1.1 (6.5) n=8 -2.2 (14.5) n=9 -3.3 (7.8) n=5
Percentage of mean amygdala volume overlapping with hippocampus (%) 56.9 (12.5) n=9 60.7 (17.6) n=10 56.0 (18.7) n=9 65.6 (16.5) n=8
Percentage of mean amygdala volume overlapping with temporal horn (%) 79.6 (11.2) n=9 83.8 (13.4) n=10 71.7 (12.9) n=9 84.2 (12.0) n=8

Accuracy

The observed coefficients of error for the estimates of volume were less than or equal to 0.1 for both left and right amygdalas in each diagnosis × gender subgroup, indicating that their means offer a satisfactory estimate of the true population means.

Results of analysis of variance

A univariate ANOVA of mean amygdala volume found no significant difference between schizophrenia cases and controls (F=0.5, d.f. 1,30,P=0.47), no difference between genders (F=0.1, d.f. 1,30,P=0.73) and no interaction between diagnosis and gender. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) included fixation time, which was not a significant covariate, and age, which showed a significant negative relationship with volume (F=5.4, d.f. 1,30, P=0.03). Inclusion of brain volume in a secondary ANCOVA revealed that it was a significant covariate (F=10.8, d.f. 1,29, P<0.01) which had a positive relationship with amygdala volume, and resulted in a reduced P value in the effect of age (F=0.9, d.f. 1,29, P=0.37), suggesting a relationship with age described below. When controlling for brain volume all other results remained, including the lack of difference between patients and controls, and between the genders.

A repeated-measures ANOVA revealed no significant volume asymmetry of the amygdala and no difference in amygdala symmetry between groups. An ANCOVA found that age and fixation time were not significant covariates (although there was an interaction between fixation time and side: left amygdala smaller with longer fixation time, F=8.8, d.f. 1,22, P<0.01). Brain volume also had no effect on amygdala asymmetry.

The percentage of mean amygdala volume overlapping with the hippocampus, along the temporal lobe axis, was 56% (s.d. 15) in control brains and 63% (s.d. 17) in schizophrenia. The volume overlap with the temporal horn of the ventricles was 76% (s.d. 12) in controls and 84% (s.d. 12) in schizophrenia. No significant correlations were found between amygdala volumes and temporal horn volumes.

Artefacts and covariates

As shown in Table 1, the women (F=7.0, d.f. 1,32, P=0.01), particularly those with schizophrenia (F=3.7, d.f. 1,32, P=0.06), were older at death than the men. Consequently, age at death was included as a covariate in all tests of the measured variables. As expected, the total brain volumes were larger in the men than in the women in this series. Amygdala volume was positively correlated with brain volume, which was included as a covariate in secondary ANOVAs of the measured variables to observe the effect of controlling for brain size that might mask changes in the amygdala.

Post-mortem factors

Post-mortem interval did not differ between groups and therefore was not included as a covariate. Fixation time was similarly examined and differed between groups selected by diagnosis (F=25.4, d.f. 1,32,P<0.01) and gender (F=4.0, d.f. 1,32, P=0.06). Consequently, although the distortion due to fixation stabilises after approximately 3 weeks (Reference Quester and SchroderQuester & Schroder, 1997) and all of the brains studied should therefore have reached a stable state prior to examination, fixation time was included as a covariate in the analysis of amygdala volume.

Clinical factors

Within the group of patients with schizophrenia, age of illness onset and neuroleptic medication were found to have no influence on the mean amygdala volume or the asymmetry of amygdala volumes. The mean level of medication within the schizophrenia group corresponded to a rating of ‘average’ or ‘much’.

DISCUSSION

In a review of MRI studies McCarley et al (Reference McCarley, Wible and Frumin1999) reported that 77% of 30 studies showed a reduction in volume in at least one of the hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus or amygdala. By meta-analysis Lawrie & Abukmeil (Reference Lawrie and Abukmeil1998) found a median volume reduction of approximately 6% over ten studies measuring the combined amygdala and hippocampus, and about 10% from six studies measuring the amygdala separately. A meta-analysis by Nelson et al (Reference Nelson, Saykin and Flashman1998) found a reduction of about 8% from MRI studies measuring the amygdala and hippocampus and about 5% from five studies measuring the amygdala separately. They suggested that inclusion of the amygdala significantly increased the size of the reduction. The most recent meta-analysis, by Wright et al (Reference Wright, Rabe Hesketh and Woodruff2000), found that the amygdala was 94% of its normal size relative to cerebral volume differences in schizophrenia.

In contrast, the post-mortem study by Heckers et al (Reference Heckers, Heinsen and Heinsen1990) found no difference in the volume of the amygdala in 20 patients (see Table 4). Similarly, Pakkenberg's post-mortem planimetry study (Reference PakkenbergPakkenberg, 1990) found no difference in volume of the basolateral nucleus, which constitutes a large percentage of the amygdala (the cortico-basolateral nuclei constitute 75% according to Reference EcclesEccles, 1989). These differ from the original finding of reduced amygdala volume in post-mortem material (Reference Bogerts, Meertz and Schonfeldt BauschBogerts et al, 1985).

Table 3 Studies of the amygdala identified by Nelson et al (Reference Nelson, Saykin and Flashman1998), Lawrie & Abukmeil (Reference Lawrie and Abukmeil1998) and a Medline search of articles since 1998. The later studies have better scan resolution and assess more than two slices through the amygdala. No slice thickness is given for studies that measure only one slice. For studies with more than two slices through the amygdala, the boundary used to divide the amygdala portion of a segmentation from the hippocampal portion is given. If a subdivision was measured, the findings refer only to the anterior, amygdaloid portion

Study Number of slices Interslice spacing (mm) Arbitrary boundary Significant volume reduction?
> 3 mm ≤ 3 mm
Kelsoe et al(Reference Kelsoe, Cadet and Pickar1988) 2 10 No
Suddath et al(Reference Suddath, Casanova and Goldberg1989) 1 Yes
Barta et al(Reference Barta, Pearlson and Powers1990) 2 3 Yes
Bogerts et al(Reference Bogerts, Ashtari and Degreef1990) > 2 3.1 Mamillary bodies No
Dauphinais et al (Reference Dauphinals, DeLisi and Crow1990) 2 10 Yes
Suddath et al(Reference Suddath, Christison and Torrey1990) 1 No
Blackwood et al(Reference Blackwood, Young and McQueen1991) > 2 8 Undefined No
DeLisi et al(Reference DeLisi, Hoff and Schwartz1991) > 2 7 Combined measure No
Breier et al(Reference Breier, Buchanan and Elkashef1992) > 2 3 Overlap excluded Yes
Hoff et al(Reference Hoff, Riordan and O'Donnell1992) > 2 7 Pons No
Shenton et al(Reference Shenton, Kikinis and Jolesz1992) > 2 1.5 Mamillary bodies Yes
Swayze et al(Reference Swayze, Andreason and Alliger1992) 2 10 No
Bogerts et al(Reference Bogerts, Lieberman and Ashtari1993) > 2 3.1 Mamillary bodies No
Marsh et al(Reference Marsh, Suddath and Higgins1994) 1 Yes
Rossi et al(Reference Rossi, Stratta and Mancini1994) 2 6 Yes
Becker et al(Reference Becker, Elmer and Schneider1996) > 2 4 Mamillary bodies No
Pearlson et al(Reference Pearlson, Barta and Powers1997) 2 3 Yes
Hirayasu et al(Reference Hirayasu, Shenton and Salisbury1998) > 2 1.5 Mamillary bodies No
Giedd et al(Reference Giedd, Jeffries and Blumenthal1999) > 2 2 Tracing No
Sanderson et al (Reference Sanderson, Best and Doody1999) > 2 1.9 Combined measure Yes
Seidman et al(Reference Seidman, Faraone and Goldstein1999) > 2 3 10/24 of AC-PC distance (automated) No
Altshuler et al(Reference Altshuler, Bartzokis and Grieder2000) > 2 1.4 Tracing No
Niemann et al(Reference Niemann, Hammers and Coenen2000) > 2 2.2 Tracing No
Staal et al(Reference Staal, Hulshoff Pol and Schnack2000) > 2 1.6 Optic tract No

Table 4 Post-mortem studies of the amygdala in schizophrenia

Study Structure Volume (cm3) Significant difference?1
Control mean (s.d.) Schizophrenia mean (s.d.)
Bogerts et al(Reference Bogerts, Meertz and Schonfeldt Bausch1985) Amygdala 1.62 (0.78) n=8 1.27 (0.78) n=9 P=0.48
Heckers et al(Reference Heckers, Heinsen and Heinsen1990) Amygdala 1.20 (0.14) n=20 1.29 (0.22) n=20 NS
Pakkenberg (Reference Pakkenberg1990) Basolateral amygdala 0.192 n=5 0.192 n=5 NS

Contrary to what might be expected if schizophrenia is a disorder of the limbic system, no volumetric reduction in the amygdala was found in this set of brains. If sustained, this conclusion suggests that the structural changes that have been established in post-mortem studies (Reference Brown, Colter and CorsellisBrown et al, 1986; Reference Altshuler, Casanova and GoldbergAltshuler et al, 1990), including those of the parahippocampal gyrus in brains from this collection (Reference McDonald, Highley and WalkerMcDonald et al, 2000), do not extend equally to other parts of the limbic system such as the amygdala and, as previously indicated, may not substantively involve the fornix (Reference Chance, Highley and EsiriChance et al, 1999).

MRI limitations

Although consistent with other post-mortem findings (Reference Heckers, Heinsen and HeinsenHeckers et al, 1990; Reference PakkenbergPakkenberg, 1990) the absence of a reduction of amygdala size apparently runs counter to the weight of published neuro-imaging research. Recent MRI reviews and meta-analyses include studies from the early 1990s, since which time imaging technology has improved. The most obvious limitations of older studies is low scan resolution. Several studies provide only one or two slices through the amygdala (Table 3). Such limited sampling exacerbates the problem of delineating the amygdala, separating it from the hippocampus and the temporal horn of the ventricle. Several authors concluded that the delineation of the amygdala was unreliable and excluded it from their analysis (Reference Flaum, Swayze and O'LearyFlaumet al, 1995), or excluded the region of overlap with the hippocampus (Reference Breier, Buchanan and ElkashefBreier et al, 1992). Many studies (e.g. Reference DeLisi, Hoff and SchwartzDeLisi et al, 1991) simply included it with the hippocampus. Some studies (e.g. Bogerts et al, Reference Bogerts, Ashtari and Degreef1990, Reference Bogerts, Lieberman and Ashtari1993; Reference Seidman, Faraone and GoldsteinSeidman et al, 1999) that divided a segmentation including both amygdala and hippocampus into a posterior portion and an anterior portion (deemed to represent the amygdala) found a volume reduction only when the posterior portion was included.

Table 3 surveys the MRI studies from the period 1988-2000 that have measured the volume of the amygdala in schizophrenia. Studies that provided only one or two slices through the amygdala have been noted. The outcome of the study is reported for the measurement deemed to be closest to an amygdala volume. In some cases this is the anterior part of a hippocampus—amygdala complex. In studies in which the amygdala was defined as a separate entity, the landmark used for the posterior boundary is important. An interslice spacing has been reported for studies that measured more than one slice through the amygdala. The interslice spacing is composed of both slice thickness and, when present, interslice gap, and is split into categories of less than or greater than 3 mm, since a distance greater than 3 mm has been reported to reduce significantly the accuracy of MRI measurements (Reference Luft, Skalej and WelteLuft et al, 1996).

Limitations of meta-analysis

Although apparently consistent evidence of amygdala volume reduction emerges from compilations of studies, such meta-analyses conceal a potential source of bias. In most studies a landmark external to the temporal lobe was used either to mark the division into anterior and posterior portions, or to begin segmentation of the amygdala. Few MRI studies that provide more than two slices through the amygdala delineate it without the use of an external landmark (Fig. 4). The landmarks include the mamillary bodies (Bogerts et al, Reference Bogerts, Ashtari and Degreef1990, Reference Bogerts, Lieberman and Ashtari1993; Reference Shenton, Kikinis and JoleszShenton et al, 1992; Reference Rossi, Stratta and ManciniRossi et al, 1994; Reference Becker, Elmer and SchneiderBecker et al, 1996; Reference Hirayasu, Shenton and SalisburyHirayasu et al, 1998), the optic tract (Reference Staal, Hulshoff Pol and SchnackStaalet al, 2000), the pons (Reference Hoff, Riordan and O'DonnellHoff et al, 1992), and the anterior and posterior commissures (Reference Seidman, Faraone and GoldsteinSeidman et al, 1999). However, the temporal lobes have been reported to be preferentially shortened in schizophrenia (Reference Bartzokis, Nuechterlein and MarderBartzokis et al, 1996). For example, in the present series of brains, measurement from the pole to the posterior sylvian fissure (Reference Highley, Esiri and McDonaldHighley et al, 1998), and to the ventricular trigone (further details available from the author upon request), have found shorter temporal lobes despite controlling for brain size. In this situation, landmarks that lie outside the temporal lobe in cases of schizophrenia will be further forwards relative to structures within the temporal lobe. Consequently, the use of external landmarks in MRI studies could constitute one systematic source of error, yielding smaller estimates of amygdala volume such as are identified in the meta-analyses.

Fig. 4 The mamillary body can be used to delineate the boundary between hippocampus and amygdala. The approximate positions of the amygdala (horizontal stripes) and hippocampus (vertical stripes) are shown. The line B runs through the mamillary body orthogonal to the line (A) between the anterior and posterior commissures.

Furthermore, this study found that at least half of the volume of the amygdala overlaps the hippocampus along the axis of the temporal lobe. This emphasises the necessity of clearly differentiating the two structures to obtain accurate volumes. Although the mean amygdala volume was not changed in this study, the percentage of its volume overlapped by the neighbouring hippocampus and temporal horn was slightly more in the brains from subjects who had schizophrenia. The greater surface of amygdala bordered by the high contrast of an enlarged temporal horn in schizophrenia could lead to a more conservative segmentation of the amygdala on MRI scans.

Hemisphere and gender

No significant asymmetry of amygdala volume was found in these brains — a finding similar to that of Heckers et al (Reference Heckers, Heinsen and Heinsen1990). No difference of asymmetry was noted between patients with schizophrenia and comparison subjects. In contrast to the finding of Fukuzako et al (Reference Fukuzako, Yamada and Kodama1997), who showed that a relatively larger right hippocampus was correlated with later age of illness onset, no correlation between amygdala asymmetry and age of onset was found. This was accompanied by an absence of significant difference between the genders, similar to the findings of Bryant et al (Reference Bryant, Buchanan and Vladar1999), although the mean amygdala volume in the women seemed to be a little less than that in the men (see Table 2) — presumably associated with the normal human sexual dimorphism of total brain size.

Interpreting normal volume

The negative findings of this study (particularly in relation to imaging studies) raise the possibility of a type II error (i.e. a failure to identify a difference between groups because of small sample size). A power analysis using the Statmate program, version 1.01 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA) indicates that this study had about 15% power to detect a change of 5-7% of amygdala volume, as suggested by MRI meta-analyses. This rises to about 30% power to detect a change of 10% volume, and 80% power to detect a change of 20% (power=1 — p (type II error); the model was a two-samples t-test with α=0.05). The observed coefficients of error, which take into account sample size to determine how good an estimate of the true population mean is provided by the sample mean, were all satisfactory, at less than or equal to 0.1.

The absence of a gross volumetric reduction in this study does not discount a cytoarchitectural or neurochemical disturbance. Increased dopamine innervations on the left (Reference ReynoldsReynolds, 1983) and reduced binding of γ-aminobutyric acid (Reference Simpson, Slater and DeakinSimpson et al, 1989) in the amygdala in schizophrenia, have been interpreted as a loss of inhibition which might induce positive symptoms (Reference ReynoldsReynolds, 1995). Such changes may reflect a change in connectivity, for example of the dopaminergic afferent fibres, rather than an alteration in gross volume.

The study was limited by the use of elderly, medicated subjects, and Bogerts et al (Reference Bogerts, Falkal and Greve1991) have suggested that age-related brain atrophy may obscure reductions in limbic structures. In our study the negative association of age with volume could act to reduce any apparent diminution in volume in the subjects with schizophrenia, since the control subjects were on average 5 years older (means: controls 69 years, patients 64 years). However, age was controlled for as a covariate in the analyses of volume. The use of MRI can avoid these complications.

Magnetic resonance imaging is most appropriate for assessment of macroscopic measurements, while post-mortem examination is still the only option at a microscopic scale. Currently, the amygdala stands at the limit of structures that can be satisfactorily determined using MRI. Recent and improving methods of assessment, which make use of visual tracing of the amygdala—hippocampus boundary, using the alveus and local anatomical features rather than other external landmarks, should provide a more reliable source of measurements (Reference Kates, Abrams and KaufmannKates et al, 1997; Reference Niemann, Hammers and CoenenNiemann et al, 2000; Reference Pruessner, Li and SerlesPruessneret al, 2000). Further studies are required to clarify which, if any, components of the limbic system are affected in schizophrenia. The current study supports the conclusion that volume reductions of the amygdala in schizophrenia are not large, and that small reductions reported in MRI may be due to coarse delineation methods that could introduce bias to subsequent meta-analyses.

Clinical Implications and Limitations

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

  1. The volume of the amygdala is unchanged in schizophrenia.

  2. Schizophrenia does not affect all components of the limbic system equally.

  3. Structural change elsewhere in the temporal lobes may introduce bias in magnetic resonance imaging studies.

LIMITATIONS

  1. Although satisfactory for a post-mortem study, the sample size does not exclude small differences of amygdala volume in schizophrenia.

  2. There may be alterations in other morphological aspects of the amygdala such as cellular composition.

  3. Age-related brain changes may obscure size reductions in limbic structures.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr B. McDonald, Dr S. J. Cooper, Mrs H. Roberts and Mrs A. Halsey.

Footnotes

Declaration of interest

This work was supported by the Medical Research Council and the SANE Trust.

References

Altshuler, L. L., Casanova, M. F., Goldberg, T. E., et al (1990) The hippocampus and parahippocampus in schizophrenia, suicide, and control brains. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 10291034.Google Scholar
Altshuler, L. L., Bartzokis, G., Grieder, T., et al (2000) An MRI study of temporal lobe structures in men with bipolar-disorder or schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 48, 147162.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn) (DSM – IV). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Barta, P. E., Pearlson, G. D., Powers, R. E., et al (1990) Auditory hallucinations and smaller superior temporal gyral volume in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 1457–1162.Google Scholar
Bartzokis, G., Nuechterlein, K. H., Marder, S. R., et al (1996) Age at illness onset and left temporal lobe length in males with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 67, 189201.Google Scholar
Becker, T., Elmer, K., Schneider, F., et al (1996) Confirmation of reduced temporal limbic structure volume on magnetic resonance imaging in male patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 67, 135143.Google Scholar
Benes, F. M. & Berretta, S. (2000) Amygdalo-entorhinal inputs to the hippocampal formation in relation to schizophrenia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 911, 293304.Google Scholar
Blackwood, D. H., Young, A. H., McQueen, J. K., et al (1991) Magnetic resonance imaging in schizophrenia: altered brain morphology associated with P300 abnormalities and eye tracking dysfunction. Biological Psychiatry, 30, 753769.Google Scholar
Bogerts, B. (1997) The temporolimbic system theory of positive schizophrenic symptoms. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 23, 423435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogerts, B., Meertz, E., Schonfeldt Bausch, R., et al (1985) Basal ganglia and limbic system pathology in schizophrenia. A morphometric study of brain volume and shrinkage. Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 784791.Google Scholar
Bogerts, B., Ashtari, M., Degreef, G., et al (1990) Reduced temporal limbic structure volumes on magnetic resonance images in first episode schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 35, 113.Google Scholar
Bogerts, B., Falkal, P. & Greve, B. (1991) Evidence of reduced temporolimbic structure volumes in schizophrenia (letter; comment). Archives of General Psychiatry, 48, 956958.Google Scholar
Bogerts, B., Lieberman, J. A., Ashtari, M., et al (1993) Hippocampus–amygdala volumes and psychopathology in chronic schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 33, 236246.Google Scholar
Breier, A., Buchanan, R. W., Elkashef, A., et al (1992) Brain morphology and schizophrenia. Amagnetic resonance imaging study of limbic, prefrontal cortex, and caudate structures. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49, 921926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., Colter, N., Corsellis, J. A., et al (1986) Postmortem evidence of structural brain changes in schizophrenia. Differences in brain weight, temporal horn area, and parahippocampal gyrus compared with affective disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43, 3642.Google Scholar
Bryant, N. L., Buchanan, R. W., Vladar, K., et al (1999) Gender differences in temporal lobe structures of patients with schizophrenia: a volumetric MRI study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 603609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chance, S. A., Highley, J. R., Esiri, M. M., et al (1999) Fiber content of the fornix in schizophrenia: lack of evidence for a primary limbic encephalopathy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 17201724.Google Scholar
Dauphinals, L. D., DeLisi, L. E., Crow, T. J., et al (1990) Reduction in temporal lobe size in siblings with schizophrenia: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Psychiatry Research, 35, 137147.Google Scholar
DeLisi, L. E., Hoff, A. L., Schwartz, J. E., et al (1991) Brain morphology in first-episode schizophrenic-like psychotic patients: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study. Biological Psychiatry, 29, 159175.Google Scholar
Eccles, J. C. (1989) Evolution of The Brain: Creation of The Self, p. 105. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flaum, M., Swayze, V. W., O'Leary, D. S., et al (1995) Effects of diagnosis, laterality, and gender on brain morphology in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 704714.Google Scholar
Fukuzako, H., Yamada, K., Kodama, S., et al (1997) Hippocampal volume asymmetry and age at illness onset in males with schizophrenia. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 247, 248251.Google Scholar
Giedd, J. N., Jeffries, N. O., Blumenthal, J., et al (1999) Childhood-onset schizophrenia: progressive brain changes during adolescence. Biological Psychiatry, 46, 892898.Google Scholar
Glantz, S. A. & Slinker, B. K. (2000) Primer of Applied Regression and Analysis of Variance (2nd edn). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gundersen, H. J. & Jensen, E. B. (1987) The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction. Journal of Microscopy, 147, 229263.Google Scholar
Heckers, S., Heinsen, H., Heinsen, Y. C., et al (1990) Limbic structures and lateral ventricle in schizophrenia. Aquantitative postmortem study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 10161022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highley, J. R., Esiri, M. M., McDonald, B., et al (1998) Temporal-lobe length is reduced, and gyral folding is increased in schizophrenia: a post-mortem study Schizophrenia Research, 34, 112.Google Scholar
Hirayasu, Y., Shenton, M. E., Salisbury, D. F., et al (1998) Lower left temporal lobe MRI volumes in patients with first-episode schizophrenia compared with psychotic patients with first-episode affective disorder and normal subjects. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 13841391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoff, A. L., Riordan, H., O'Donnell, D., et al (1992) Anomalous lateral sulcus asymmetry and cognitive function in first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 18, 257272.Google Scholar
Kates, W. R., Abrams, M. T., Kaufmann, W. E., et al (1997) Reliability and validity of MRI measurement of the amygdala and hippocampus in children with fragile X syndrome. Psychiatry Research, 75, 3148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelsoe, J. R., Cadet, J. L., Pickar, D., et al (1988) Quantitative neuroanatomy in schizophrenia. Acontrolled magnetic resonance imaging study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 533541.Google Scholar
Lawrie, S. M. & Abukmeil, S. S. (1998) Brain abnormallity in schizophrenia. A systematic and quantitative review of volumetric magnetic resonance imaging studies. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 110120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luft, A. R., Skalej, M., Welte, D., et al (1996) Reliability and exactness of MRI-based volumetry: a phantom study. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 6, 700704.Google Scholar
Marsh, L., Suddath, R., Higgins, N., et al (1994) Medial temporal lobe structures in schizophrenia: relationship of size to duration of illness. Schizophrenia Research, II, 225238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarley, R. W., Wible, C. G., Frumin, M., et al (1999) MRI anatomy of schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 45, 10991119.Google Scholar
McDonald, B., Highley, J. R., Walker, M. A., et al (2000) Anomalous asymmetry of fusiform and parahippocampal gyrus gray matter in schizophrenia: a postmortem study American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 4047.Google Scholar
Mirra, S. S., Heyman, A., McKeel, D., et al (1991) The consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD). Part II: Standardization of the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology, 41, 479486.Google Scholar
Nelson, M. D., Saykin, A. J., Flashman, L. A., et al (1998) Hippocampal volume reduction in schizophrenia as assessed bymagnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analytic study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 433440.Google Scholar
Niemann, K., Hammers, A., Coenen, V. A., et al (2000) Evidence of a smaller lefthippocampus and left temporal horn in both patients with first episode schizophrenia and normal control subjects. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 99, 93110.Google Scholar
Pakkenberg, B. (1990) Pronounced reduction of total neuron number in mediodorsal thalamic nucleus and nucleus accumbens in schizophrenics. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 10231028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearlson, G. D., Barta, P. E. & Powers, R. E. (1997) Medial and superior temporal gyral volumes and cerebral asymmetryin schizophrenia versus bipolar disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 41, 114.Google Scholar
Pruessner, J. C., Li, L. M., Serles, W., et al (2000) Volumetry of hippocampus and amygdala with high-resolution MRI and three-dimensional analysis software: minimizing the discrepancies between laboratories. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 433442.Google Scholar
Quester, R. & Schroder, R. (1997) The shrinkage of the human brain stem during formalin fixation and embedding in paraffin. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 75, 8189.Google Scholar
Reynolds, G. P. (1983) Increased concentrations and lateral asymmetry of amygdala dopamine in schizophrenia. Nature, 305, 527529.Google Scholar
Reynolds, G. P. (1995) Neurotransmitter systems in schizophrenia. International Review of Neurobiology, 38, 305309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, A., Stratta, P., Mancini, F., et al (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging findings of amygdala–anterior hippocampus shrinkage in male patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 52, 4353.Google Scholar
Sanderson, T. L., Best, J. J., Doody, G. A., et al (1999) Neuroanatomy of comorbid schizophrenia and learning disability: a controlled study. Lancet, 354, 18671871.Google Scholar
Seidman, L. J., Faraone, S. V., Goldstein, J. M., et al (1999) Thalamic and amygdala–hippocampal volume reductions in first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia: an MRI-based morphometric analysis. Biological Psychiatry, 46, 941954.Google Scholar
Shenton, M. E., Kikinis, R., Jolesz, F. A., et al (1992) Abnormalities of the left temporal lobe and thought disorder in schizophrenia. A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study. New England Journal of Medicine, 327, 604612.Google Scholar
Simpson, M. D., Slater, P., Deakin, J. F., et al (1989) Reduced GABA uptake sites in the temporal lobe in schizophrenia. Neuroscience Letters, 107, 211215.Google Scholar
Slater, E. & Beard, A. W. (1963) The schizophrenia-like psychoses of epilepsy. I. Psychiatric aspects. British Journal of Psychiatry, 109, 95150.Google Scholar
SPSS (1998) SPSS for Windows base System User's Manual. Release 9.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
Staal, W. G., Hulshoff Pol, H. E., Schnack, H. G., et al (2000) Structural brain abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia and their healthy siblings. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 416421.Google Scholar
Suddath, R. L., Casanova, M. F., Goldberg, T. E., et al (1989) Temporal lobe pathology in schizophrenia: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 464472.Google Scholar
Suddath, R. L., Christison, G. W., Torrey, E. F., et al (1990) Anatomical abnormalities in the brains of monozygotic twins discordant for schizophrenia. New England Journal of Medicine, 322, 789794.Google Scholar
Swayze, V. W., Andreason, N. C., Alliger, R. J., et al (1992) Subcortical and temporal structures in affective disorder and schizophrenia: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Biological Psychiatry, 31, 221240.Google Scholar
Torrey, E. & Peterson, M. (1974) Schizophrenia and the limbic system. Lancet, ii, 942946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, I. C., Rabe Hesketh, S., Woodruff, P. W., et al (2000) Meta-analysis of regional brain volumes in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1625.Google Scholar
Zar, J. H. (1984) Biostatistical Analysis (2nd edn). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Demographic variables and details of the brain collection for the amygdala study

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Cross-section of the amygdala and hippocampus. Staining with Luxol fast blue and cresyl violet results in dark staining of areas containing predominantly white matter fibre tracts and lighter staining of nuclei-containing cell bodies. The amygdala lies superior to and overlaps the hippocampus.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 The black crosses of the acetate counting grid appear large when superimposed over a section under a × 7 magnification. Points falling within the structure of interest such as the amygdala grey matter (circled) are counted.

Figure 3

Fig. 3 No difference in amygdala volume was found between the study groups.

Figure 4

Table 2 Amygdala measurements in the post-mortem study group. Values are actual measured values uncorrected for tissue shrinkage

Figure 5

Table 3 Studies of the amygdala identified by Nelson et al (1998), Lawrie & Abukmeil (1998) and a Medline search of articles since 1998. The later studies have better scan resolution and assess more than two slices through the amygdala. No slice thickness is given for studies that measure only one slice. For studies with more than two slices through the amygdala, the boundary used to divide the amygdala portion of a segmentation from the hippocampal portion is given. If a subdivision was measured, the findings refer only to the anterior, amygdaloid portion

Figure 6

Table 4 Post-mortem studies of the amygdala in schizophrenia

Figure 7

Fig. 4 The mamillary body can be used to delineate the boundary between hippocampus and amygdala. The approximate positions of the amygdala (horizontal stripes) and hippocampus (vertical stripes) are shown. The line B runs through the mamillary body orthogonal to the line (A) between the anterior and posterior commissures.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.