Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:44:47.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AIMS Ratings – Repeatability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

J. A. Bergen ,
N. B. Carter ,
J. Craig ,
D. MacFarlane ,
E. F. Smith  and
P. J. V. Beumont
J. A. Bergen*
Affiliation:
NSW Institute of Psychiatry, Dept of Psychiatry, University of Sydney
N. B. Carter
Affiliation:
Division of Mathematics and Statistics, Sydney
J. Craig
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Sydney
D. MacFarlane
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Sydney
E. F. Smith
Affiliation:
Division of Mathematics and Statistics, Sydney
P. J. V. Beumont
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
*
∗Department of Community Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, 2050
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the present study, two raters, a psychologist and a nurse, each made five independent ratings of 30 different video-recorded patient-examinations. Having thus excluded patient fluctuation, individual-rater consistency and between-rater agreement over the 6 weeks of the study are examined. While between-rater agreement was apparently being maintained, mean AIMS scores steadily increased. In the hands of these raters, AIMS items 2 and 4 emerged as very reliable, while items 1, 6, and 7 showed high variability. Some patients appeared to be hard to rate. Differences between the study raters and the author JB highlight the issue: how reproducible is an AIMS rating?

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 152 , Issue 5 , May 1988 , pp. 670 - 673
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1988 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergen, J. A., Griffiths, D. A., Rey, J. M. & Beumont, P. J. V. (1984) Tardive dyskinesia: fluctuating patient or fluctuating rater. British Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 498–502.Google Scholar
Flack, V. F. (1987) Confidence intervals for the interrater agreement measure kappa. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 16, 953–968.Google Scholar
Guy, W. (1976) ECDU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology, pp. 534–537. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education and Welfare.Google Scholar
Schooler, N. R. & Kane, J. M. (1982) Research diagnoses for tardive dyskinesia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 486–487.Google ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.