Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:55:03.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Acute’ and ‘Chronic’ Hysteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Russell Meares  and
Thomas Horvath
Russell Meares
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychiatry and Medicine
Thomas Horvath
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The diagnosis of hysteria has seemed a hazardous one since Slater (1965) pronounced it ‘not only a delusion but also a snare’. His conclusion was based on the demonstrable fragility of the diagnosis when usually accepted criteria are used. Against this, Guze (1967) has put forward evidence which suggests that when his criteria are applied the diagnosis is a stable one. Lader and Sartorius (1968), in a study of 10 patients, also seemed to show that those with conversion hysteria were a single group on the criterion of their failure to habituate to 20 repetitions of a standard stimulus, a disability which distinguished them from other neurotic groups. Slater, however, in criticizing the Perley and Guze (1962) concept, remarked that two residual groups, rather than one, remained as diagnostically unchanged in his 10-year follow-up.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 121 , Issue 565 , December 1972 , pp. 653 - 657
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1972 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Behrman, J., and Levy, R. (1970). ‘Neurophysiological studies on patients with hysterical disturbances of vision.’ Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 14, 187–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brain, Lord (1964). Clinical Neurology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garter, A. B. (1949). ‘Prognosis of certain hysterical symptoms.’ British Medical Journal, i, 1076–9.Google Scholar
Chodoff, P., and Lyons, H. (1958). ‘Hysteria, the hysterical personality and hysterical conversion.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 734–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, H. J., and Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. University of London Press.Google Scholar
Guze, S. B. (1967). ‘The diagnosis of hysteria: What are we trying to do?’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 124, 491–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez-Peon, R., Chavez-Ibarra, G., Aquilar Fioueroa, E. (1963). ‘Somatic evoked potentials in one case of hysterical anaesthesia.’ Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 15, 889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horvath, T. B., and Meares, R. A. (1971). Unpublished data.Google Scholar
Janet, P. Mental State of Hystericals, 1901; Major Symptoms of Hysteria, 1907; also in Hysteria (1960 New York: Hafner).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lader, M. H., and Sartorius, N. (1968). ‘Anxiety in patients with hysterical conversion symptoms.’ Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery Nand Psychiatry, 31, 490–5Google ScholarPubMed
Lader, M. H., and Sartorius, N. and Wing, L. (1966). Physiological Methods, Sedative MDrugs and Morbid Anxiety. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lader, M. H., and Sartorius, N. (1967). Studies in Anxiety (ed. M. H. Lader), pp. 53–61. British Journal of Psychiatry Special Publication no. 3.Google Scholar
Perley, M. J., and Guze, S. B. (1962). ‘The stability and usefulness of clinical criteria.’ New Engl. J. Med., 266–9 (421–6).Google Scholar
Slater, E. (1965). ‘Diagnosis of “hysteria”.’ British Medical Journal, i, 1395–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. A. (1953). ‘Personality scale of manifest anxiety.’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.