Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T21:58:42.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Under-inclusion”—A Characteristic of Obsessional Personality Disorder: I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

G. F. Reed*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Aberdeen

Extract

Although there is a voluminous psychiatric literature concerned with obsessional personality disorder, there are very few psychological studies of the condition. In particular, whilst the thinking of anankasts has been classically and perceptively described by many psychiatric authorities, only a handful of psychological experiments exclusively concerned with anankastic cognition have been reported (cf. Skoog, 1964). It is suggested that this is largely because interest has centred on the content of obsessional behaviour at the expense of its form. The present study is a brief report of one among several investigations suggested by consideration of the formal qualities of obsessional thought as opposed to its “dynamic” or symbolic features. The hypothesis (Reed, 1968) is that the formal characteristics of anankastic cognition are directly related to functional impairment in the spontaneous organization and integration of experience. It is postulated that this failure is expressed in the over-structuring of input and in the maladaptive over-defining of categories and boundaries. From this may be derived the prediction that, given a classificatory or conceptual task, the anankast will be over-specific in his interpretation of the given class and therefore too strict in his acceptance of appropriate class members and attributes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1969 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cameron, N. (1944). “Experimental analysis of schizophrenic thinking.” In Kasanin, J. S. (Ed.): Language and Thought in Schizophrenia. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, S. (1953). “Over-inclusive thinking in a schizophrenic and a control group.” J. cons. Psychol., 17, 384388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenichel, O. (1945). The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1936). The Problem of Anxiety. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Graber, G. H. (1931). “Neurotische Typisierung.” Int. Z. Psychoanal., 17, 159168.Google Scholar
Hamilton, V. J. (1956). “Reaction to uncertainty and ambiguity as a personality variable.” Unpublished London Univ. Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
Janet, P. (1914). Les Névroses. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W. (1961). “Cognitive abnormalities.” In Eysenck, J. J. (Ed.): Handbook of Abnormal Psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. (1958). “The measurement and correlates of category width as a cognitive variable.” J. Personality, 26, 532544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapaport, D. (1946). Diagnostic Psychological Testing, Vol. 1. Chicago: Year Book.Google Scholar
Rapaport, D. (1951). Commentary to Chapter 26: “The basic symptoms of schizophrenia” by Eugen Blculer. In Rapaport, D. (Ed.): Organization and Pathology of Thought. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Reed, G. F. (1968). “Some formal qualities of obsessional thinking.” Psychiat. clin. 1, 382–92Google Scholar
Schneider, K. (1958). Psychopathic Personalities. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Schneider, K. (1959). Clinical Psychopathology. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Skoog, G. (1964). “The anankastic individual in psychological research.” Mod. Probl. Psychiat. Neurol., 1, 422442.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1958). The Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence. Fourth ed. London: Baillière, Tindall & Cox.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.