Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:44:12.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Symptom Questionnaire Validity in Assessing the Need for Psychiatrists' Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

A. Richman ,
H. C. Slade  and
G. Gordon
A. Richman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, and Section of Social Psychiatry
H. C. Slade
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, and Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years there have been an increasing number of attempts to survey the distribution of psychiatric morbidity, or to estimate the need for psychiatric treatment, in the general population. Various methods of defining or diagnosing psychiatric illnesses have been used (Blum, 3; Scott, 20). These methods include interviews by psychiatrists (Lin, 17; Essen-Müller, 13; Hagnell, 14); the judgment of family physicians (11; Kessel, 16; Shapiro and Fink, 21); the use of self-administered symptom check lists (White et al., 23); and structured interviews by non-psychiatrists relating to symptom occurrence, attitudes, personality scales, etc. This paper outlines an attempt to determine some of the relationships between the results of a symptom-questionnaire; the diagnoses recorded by physicians; and the physicians' request for psychiatric consultation.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 112 , Issue 487 , June 1966 , pp. 549 - 555
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1966 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Arnhoff, F. N., La Vern, C. S., and Seymour, R. S. (1956). “The Cornell Medical Index in a psychiatric outpatient clinic.” J. Clin. Psychol., 12, 263–8.Google Scholar
2. Avnet, Helen H. (1962). Psychiatric Insurance. New York: Group Health Insurance.Google Scholar
3. Blum, R. H. (1962). “Case identification in psychiatric epidemiology: methods and problems.” Milb. Mem. Fund. Quart., 40, 253–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Brodman, K., Erdmann, A. J., Lorge, I., and Wolff, H. G. (1949). “The Cornell Medical Index: an adjunct to medical interview.” J.A.M.A., 140, 530–4.Google Scholar
5. Brodman, K., Erdmann, A. J., Lorge, I., and Wolff, H. G. (1951). “The Cornell Medical Index—Health Questionnaire II, as a diagnostic instrument.” Ibid., 145, 152–7.Google Scholar
6. Brodman, K., Erdmann, A. J., Lorge, I., Gershenson, C. P., and Wolff, H. G. (1952). “The Cornell Medical Index—Health Questionnaire III. The evaluation of emotional disturbances.” J. clin. Psychol., 8, 119–24.Google Scholar
7. Brodman, K., Erdmann, A. J., Lorge, I., Gershenson, C. P., and Wolff, H. G. (1952). “The Cornell Medical Index—Health Questionnaire IV. The recognition of emotional disturbance in a general hospital.” Ibid., 8, 289–93.Google Scholar
8. Brodman, K., Erdmann, A. J., Lorge, I., Deutschberoer, J., and Wolff, H. G. (1954). “The Cornell Medical Index—Health Questionnaire VII. The prediction of psychosomatic and psychiatric disabilities in army training.” Am. Jl. Psychiat., iii, 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Brodman, K., Andrianus, Jvan W., Erdmann, J. R., and Goldstein, L. S. (1959). “Interpretation of symptoms with a data-processing machine.” A.M.A. Arch. int. Med., 103, 776–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Brown, A. C., and Fry, J. (1962). “The Cornell Medical Index health questionnaire in the identification of neurotic patients in general practice.” Jl. psychosom. Res., 6, 185–90.Google Scholar
11. College of General Practitioners, The Research Committee of the Council, Morbidity Statistics from General Practice, Volume III (Disease in General Practice). General Register Office, Studies on Medical and Population Subjects No. 14, London, HMSO, 1962.Google Scholar
12. Culpan, R. H., Davies, B. M., and Oppenheim, A. N. (1960). “Incidence of psychiatric illness among hospital outpatients. An application of the Cornell Medical Index.” B.M.J., i, 855–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Essen-Müller, E. (1956). “Individual Traits and Morbidity in a Swedish rural population.” Acta psychiat. Scand., Vol. 31, Suppl. 100.Google Scholar
14. Hagnell, O. (1959). “Neuroses and other nervous disturbances in a population living in a rural area of Southern Sweden, investigated in 1947 and 1957.” Acta psychiat. Scand., 34, Suppl. 136, 214–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Hamilton, M., Pond, D. A., and Ryle, A. (1962). “Relation of CMI responses to some social and psychological factors.” J. psychosom. Res., 6, 157–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Kessel, W. I. N. (1960). “Psychiatric morbidity in a London general practice.” Brit. J. prev. soc. Med., 14, 16–22.Google Scholar
17. Lin, T. Y. (1953). “A study of the incidence of mental disorder in Chinese and other cultures.” Psychiatry, 16, 313–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Ryle, A., and Hamilton, , Madge, (1962). “Neurosis in fifty married couples.” J. ment. Sci., 108, 265–73.Google Scholar
19. Scheff, T. J. (1963). “Decision rules, types of error, and their consequences in medical diagnosis.” Behav. Science, 8, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Scott, W. A. (1958). “Research definitions of mental health and mental illness.” Psychol. Bull., 55, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Shapiro, S., and Fink, R. (1963). “Methodological consideration in studying patterns of medical care related to mental illness.” Milb. Mem. Fund. Quart; 41, 371–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Watts, C. A. H., Cawte, E. C, and Kvenssberg, E. V. (1964). “Survey of mental illness in general practice.” B.M. J., ii, 1351–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. White, C, Reznikoff, M., and Ewell, J. W. (1958). “Usefulness of the Cornell Medical Index Health Questionnaire in a College Health Department.” Merit. Hyg., 42, 94–105.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.