Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:10:27.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sedation Threshold, Autonomic Lability and the Excitation-Inhibition Theory of Personality

I. The Cold Pressor Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

G. S. Claridge ,
R. J. Wawman  and
M. H. Davies
G. S. Claridge
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental and Clinical Psychology, Barrow Hospital, Barrow Gurney, near Bristol
R. J. Wawman
Affiliation:
The Queen Alexandra Military Hospital, Millbank, London, S.W.1
M. H. Davies
Affiliation:
Royal Victoria Hospital, Netley, near Southampton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a previous paper (Claridge and Herrington, 1960) it was demonstrated that by using a modified version of the sedation threshold technique, originally described by Shagass (1954), it was possible to differentiate neurotics diagnosed as hysterics and those diagnosed as anxiety states (dysthymics). In keeping with Eysenck's theory of neurosis (1955) and drug action (1957), it was found that dysthymics had significantly higher thresholds for sodium amylobarbitone than hysterics. In addition, supporting the earlier findings of Claridge (1960) and again Eysenck's theory of personality, dysthymics were found to have significantly longer visual aftereffects to a rotating spiral than did hysterics.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 109 , Issue 461 , July 1963 , pp. 548 - 552
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackner, B., and Pampicuone, G. (1958). “Discussion on physiological measurements of ‘emotional tension’”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 51, 76–81.Google ScholarPubMed
Claridge, G. S. (1960). In: Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), Experiments in Personality. London: Routlege & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Claridge, G. S. and Herrington, R. N. (1960). “Sedation threshold personality, and the theory of neurosis”, J. merit. Sci., 106, 1568–1583.Google ScholarPubMed
Claridge, G. S. and Herrington, R. N. (1962). In: Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), Experiments with Drugs. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1955). “A dynamic theory of anxiety and hysteria”, J. merit. Sci., 101, 28–51.Google ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, H. J. (1957). “Drugs and personality: I. Theory and methcdology”, J. merit. Sci., 103, 119–131.Google Scholar
Lacey, J. I. (1956). “The evaluation of autonomic responses: toward a general solution”, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 67, 125–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seager, C. P. (1960). “Problems in technique concerning the sedation threshold”, EEG. clin. Neurophysiol., 12, 910–913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shagass, G. (1954). “The sedation threshold. A method for estimating tension in psychiatric patients”, EEG. clin. Neurophysiol., 6, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shagass, G. (1958). “Neurophysiological studies of anxiety and depression”, A.P.A. Psychiat. Res. Reports, No. 8.Google Scholar
Thorpe, J. G., and Barker, J. C. (1957). “Objectivity of the sedation threshold”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 78, 194–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Merwe, A. B., (1948). “The diagnostic value of peripheral vasomotor reactions in the psychoneuroses”, Psychosom. med., 10, 347–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.