Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:02:13.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Post-hypnotic Amnesia and Post-hypnotic Effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Griffith Edwards
Griffith Edwards*
Affiliation:
Maudsley Hospital, S.E.5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this investigation was to obtain data on the influence of the subject's conscious knowledge of the content of a posthypnotic suggestion on obedience to that suggestion. Little information is available on this problem, which is one having obvious bearing on hypnotherapy. So that results could throw some light on the hypothesis that hypnosis can be explained as role-playing (Sarbin, 1950), a role-playing control group was employed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 111 , Issue 473 , April 1965 , pp. 316 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1965 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bitterman, M. E., and Marcuse, F. L. (1945). “Autonomic responses in post-hypnotic amnesia.” J. exp. Psychol., 35, 248.Google Scholar
Brown, W. (1939). Psychological Methods of Healing: an Introduction to Psychotherapy. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, G. (1961). “A technique of hypnosis.” Med. World, 94, 413.Google Scholar
Edwards, G. (1962). “Quantitative aspects of post-hypnotic effect.” Dissertation, submitted for Part II of the Academic Post-Graduate Diploma in Psychological Medicine of the University of London.Google Scholar
Edwards, G. (1963). “Duration of post-hypnotic effect.” Brit. J. Psychiat., 109, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., and Furneaux, N. D. (1945). “Primary and secondary suggestibility: an experimental study.” J. exp. Psychol., 35, 485.Google Scholar
Hall, K. R. L., and Stride, E. (1954). “Some factors affecting reaction time to auditory stimuli in mental patients.” J. Ment. Sci., 100, 462.Google Scholar
Hull, C. L. (1933). Hypnosis and Suggestibility. New York and London: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Kellogg, E. R. (1929). “Duration of the effects of posthypnotic suggestion.” J. exp. Psychol., 13, 502.Google Scholar
King, H. E. (1954). “Psychomotor aspects of mental disease.” Commonwealth Fund. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDougall, W. (1926). An Outline of Abnormal Psychology. London: Methuen and Co.Google Scholar
Palmer, H. E. (1945). “Military psychiatric casualties.” Lancet, ii, 492.Google Scholar
Patten, E. F. (1930). “The duration of post-hypnotic suggestion.” J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 25, 319.Google Scholar
Patten, E. F. (1932). “Does post-hypnotic amnesia apply to practice effect?” J. gen. Psychol., 7, 196.Google Scholar
Rogerson, C. H. (1944). “Narco-analysis with nitrous oxide.” Brit. med. J., 1, 811.Google Scholar
Sarbin, T. R. (1950). “Contributions to role-taking theory. I: Hypnotic behaviour.” Psychol. Rev., 5, 255.Google Scholar
Sargant, W., Slater, E., and Dally, P. (1963). Physical Methods of Treatment in Psychiatry. Edinburgh and London: E. and S. Livingstone.Google Scholar
Scott, H. D. (1930). “Hypnosis and the conditioned reflex.” J. gen. Psychol., 4, 113.Google Scholar
Shorvon, H. J., and Sargant, W. (1947). “Excitatory abreaction with special reference to its mechanism and the use of ether.” J. Ment. Sci., 43, 709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickler, C. B. (1929). “A quantitative study of posthypnotic amnesia.” J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 45, 160.Google Scholar
Weitzenhofer, A. M. (1953). Hypnotism: an Objective Study in Suggestibility. New York: John Wiley and Sons; London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Well, W. R. (1940). “The extent and duration of posthypnotic amnesia.” J. Psychol., 9, 137.Google Scholar
Wolpe, J. C. (1960). “Reciprocal inhibition as the main basis of psychotherapeutic effects”, in Behaviour Therapy and the Neuroses (ed. Eysenck, H. J.). Oxford and London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Young, P. C. (1925). “An experimental study of mental and physical functions in the normal and hypnotic states.” Amer. J. Psychol., 36, 214.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.