Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:02:23.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Post-Concussional State: Neurophysiological Aspects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

M. R. Watson
Affiliation:
Holywell Hospital, Antrim
G. W. Fenton*
Affiliation:
University of Dundee, Dundee
R. J. McClelland
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Belfast
J. Lumsden
Affiliation:
Department of Neurophysiology, Broadmoor Hospital, Crowthorne, Berks
M. Headley
Affiliation:
Craigavon and St. Luke's Hospitals, Armagh
W. H. Rutherford
Affiliation:
Accident and Emergency Department, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast
*
Professor G. W. Fenton, Department of Psychiatry, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland

Abstract

Background

Twenty-six young men admitted to an Accident and Emergency Department for observation following a minor closed head injury (post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) less than 12 hours) were investigated within 24 hours of admission (day 0) and followed up at 10 days, 6 weeks and 1 year after the trauma.

Method

Investigations at day 0 included physical examination, completion of post-concussional symptom and stress-arousal checklists, computerised EEG (CEEG) and auditory brainstem evoked potential (BAEP) recordings. These were repeated at ten days and six weeks. At 12 months follow-up, the Present State Examination (PSE) was carried out and a further post-concussional symptom checklist completed.

Results

Post-concussional symptomatology declined progressively from day 0 but half had residual symptoms at 1 year. Seventy-two per cent ran an acute course with recovery by 6 weeks, 8% a chronic unremitting course and 20% initially improved but had an exacerbation of symptoms between 6 weeks and 12 months. The CEEG alpha-theta ratios decreased significantly between days 0 and 10, reaching a baseline thereafter. Measures of CEEG recovery from all channels correlated with symptom counts at six weeks; the slower the recovery the greater the symptoms. A relative delay in left temporal recovery was associated with residual psychiatric morbidity (PSE ID scores) at 12 months. Prolonged central brainstem conduction times occurred in 27% of patients at day 0. These correlated positively with PTA and degree of psychiatric morbidity (PSE ID scores) at 12 months.

Conclusions

Symptom chronicity was accompanied by continuing brainstem dysfunction, while the degree of transient cortical dysfunction appeared to have a direct influence in the intensity of early organic symptom reaction to the trauma. Levels of perceived stress at the time of the injury, or afterwards, were not related to symptom formation.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cartudge, N. E. E. & Shaw, D. A. (1981) Head Injury. London: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
Cooper, R., Winter, A. L., Crow, H. J., et al (1965) Comparison of subcortical, cortical and scalp activity using chronically indwelling electrodes in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 18, 217228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dow, R. S., Ulett, G. & Raff, J. (1944) Electroencephalographic studies immediately following head injury. American Journal of Psychiatry, 101, 174183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, J. H. (1976) Epidemiology of Head Injuries in England and Wales. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Gronwall, D. & Wrightson, P. (1974) Delayed recovery of intellectual function after minor head injury. Lancet, ii, 605609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennett, B. & MacMillan, R. (1981) Epidemiology of head injury. British Medical Journal, 282, 101104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, H. S., Williams, D. H., High, W. M., et al (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography in relation to the neurobehavioural sequelae of mild and moderate head injuries. Journal of Neurosurgery, 66, 706713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lishman, W. A. (1968) Brain damage in relation to psychiatric disability after head injury. British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 373410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lishman, W. A. (1988) Physiogenesis and psychogenesis in the “Post-Concussional Syndrome”. British Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 460469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacFlynn, G., Montgomery, E. A., Fenton, G. W., et al (1984) Measurement of reaction time following minor head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 47, 13261331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackay, C., Cox, T., Burrows, G., et al (1978) An inventory for the measurement of self-reported stress and arousal. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 283284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAllister, H. G., Armstrong, G. A., McClelland, R. J., et al (1983) Data acquisition in neurophysiology: a flexible microcomputer system for recording neurophysiological data. British Journal of Audiology, 17, 275277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMillan, T. M. & Glucksman, E. E. (1987) The neuropsychology of moderate head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 50, 393397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, H. C. (1961) Accident neurosis. British Medical Journal, i, 919925, 992–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, E. A., Fenton, G. W., McClelland, R. J., et al (1991) The psychobiology of minor head injury. Psychological Medicine, 21, 375394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutherford, W. H., Merrett, J. D. & McDonald, J. R. (1977) The sequelae of concussion caused by minor head injuries. Lancet, i, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, I. & Savitsky, N. (1934) Head injury: neurologic and psychiatric aspects. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 31, 893955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimble, M. R. (1981) Post-traumatic Neurosis from Railway Spine to Whiplash. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1978) Mental Disorders: Glossary and Guide to their Classification in Accordance with the Ninth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD–9). Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.