Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:09:51.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Outcome of admission to a medium secure psychiatric unit

1. Short- and long-term outcome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2018

A. Maden ,
S. Rutter ,
T. McClintock ,
C. Friendship  and
J. Gunn
A. Maden*
Affiliation:
Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London
S. Rutter
Affiliation:
Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London
T. McClintock
Affiliation:
Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London
C. Friendship
Affiliation:
Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London
J. Gunn
Affiliation:
Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London
*
Dr Anthony Maden, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park. London SE5 8AF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

This is the first long-term follow-up of patients discharged from a medium secure unit.

Aims

To describe the short– and long-term outcomes of admission for all patients discharged during a 14-year period.

Method

A longitudinal cohort study of all 234 patients discharged from the Denis Hill Unit, Bethlem Royal Hospital, between 1980 and 1994, followed for an average 6.6 years.

Results

Although 48% of admissions were from prison, only 8% returned there, with most being transferred to another psychiatric bed. One-fifth of patients spent none of the follow-up time in the community; 75% of patients had at least one readmission; only 24% were convicted of further offences.

Conclusions

Re-offending rates are comparable with those for patients discharged from high-security hospitals, and much lower than those for released prisoners. The high readmission rates indicate the need for a range of services to maintain former patients in the community.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 175 , Issue 4 , October 1999 , pp. 313 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

See pp. 317–321, this issue.

Declaration of interest

The project was funded by a grant from the Department of Health.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.