Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:58:49.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neuroendocrine Tests during Treatment with Neuroleptic Drugs. I. Plasma Prolactin Response to Haloperidol Challenge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Tamara Kolakowska ,
Louise Braddock ,
David Wiles ,
Michael Franklin  and
Michael Gelder
Tamara Kolakowska
Affiliation:
Oxford Rotational Training Scheme in Psychiatry
Louise Braddock
Affiliation:
Oxford Rotational Training Scheme in Psychiatry
David Wiles
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Littlemore Hospital Research Unit, Oxford, OX4 4XN
Michael Franklin
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Littlemore Hospital Research Unit, Oxford, OX4 4XN
Michael Gelder
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Littlemore Hospital Research Unit, Oxford, OX4 4XN
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The plasma prolactin (PRL) response to haloperidol 2 or 4 mg i.m. was studied in 18 schizophrenic men during their routine treatment with neuroleptic drugs. A substantial rise of the PRL level above the treatment baseline occurred in all but four of the 20 tests showing that the PRL elevation induced by treatment was not maximal. The challenge was ineffective only in patients receiving very high daily doses of medication. The increment was inversely correlated to the daily dose of medication but unrelated to plasma haloperidol concentrations during the test. Chronic schizophrenics who were receiving long term treatment and had low basal PRL levels did not show tolerance to the prolactin stimulating effect of haloperidol. That prolactin rose during the test in patients who had improved during their current treatment indicates that the degree of dopamine receptor blockade required for therapeutic effects is below that which produces a maximal PRL response.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 139 , Issue 5 , November 1981 , pp. 400 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asnis, G. M., Sachar, E. J., Langer, G., Halpern, F. S. & Fink, M. (1979) Normal prolactin responses in tardive dyskinesia. Psychopharmacology, 66, 247–50.Google Scholar
Davis, J. M. (1976) Comparative doses and costs of antipsychotic medication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 855–66.Google Scholar
De Rivera, J. L., Lal, S., Ettigi, P., Hontela, S., Muller, F. H. & Friesen, H. G. (1976) Effects of acute and chronic neuroleptic therapy on serum prolactin levels in males and females of different age groups. Clinical Endocrinology, 5, 273–82.Google Scholar
Gruen, P. H., Sachar, E. J., Altman, N., Langer, G., Tabrizi, M. A. & Halpern, F. S. (1978) Relation of plasma prolactin to clinical response in schizophrenic patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 35, 1222–7.Google Scholar
Kolakowska, T., Fraser, S., Franklin, M. & Knox, J. (1981) Neuroendocrine tests during treatment with neuroleptic drugs: I. Plasma prolactin response to chlorpromazine challenge. Psychopharmacology, 72, 283–5.Google Scholar
Langer, G., Sachar, E. J., Gruen, P. H. & Halpern, F. S. (1977) Human prolactin responses to neuroleptic drugs correlate with antischizophrenic potency. Nature, 266, 639–40.Google Scholar
Laughren, T. P., Brown, W. H. & Williams, B. W. (1979) Serum prolactin and clinical state during neuroleptic treatment and withdrawal. American Journal of Psychiatry, 136, 108–10.Google ScholarPubMed
McNeilly, A. S. & Hagen, C. (1974) Prolactin, TSH, LH and FSH responses to a combined LHRH/TRH test at different stages of the menstrual cycle. Clinical Endocrinology, 3, 427–35.Google Scholar
Michiels, M., Hendriks, R. & Heykants, J. (1976) In Haloperidol Radioimmunoassay Kit, Instructions for Use. IRE, Fleurus, Belgium.Google Scholar
Naber, D., Fischer, H. & Ackenheil, M. (1979) Effect of long-term neuroleptic treatment on dopamine tubero-infundibular system: Development of tolerance? Communication in Psychopharmacology, 3, 59—65.Google Scholar
Ohman, R. & Axelsson, R. (1978) Relationship between prolactin response and antipsychotic effect of thioridazine in psychiatric patients. Europa Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 14, 111–16.Google Scholar
Rubin, R. T. & Hays, S. E. (1979) Variability of prolactin response to intravenous and intramuscular haloperidol in normal adult men. Psychopharmacology, 61, 17—24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, R. T. & Hays, S. E. (1980) The prolactin secretory response to neuroleptic drugs: Mechanisms, applications and limitations. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 5, 121–37.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J., Robins, E., Kuriamsky, J. & Gurland, B. (1975) Preliminary report of the reliability of research diagnostic criteria applied to psychiatric case records. In Predictability in Psychopharmacology, (eds. Sudilovsky, A., Gershon, S. and Beer, B.). New York: Raven Press, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.