Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:05:13.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Measurement of Consistency in Repertory Grids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Patrick Slater
Patrick Slater*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, S.E.5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A Consistency of Relationship score for comparing two grids was proposed by Bannister in 1960, revised slightly in 1962 and again, more substantially, in 1966. The theory behind it is that schizophrenic thought disorder results from repeated experiences of invalidation in construing. If a subject is repeatedly compelled to change his evaluation of an element in terms of a construct, that construct's relationship to the others composing his system may gradually become weakened—e.g. if his evaluations of an intimate acquaintance fluctuate repeatedly between loving and hating, the relationship between ‘loving’ and 'sincere’ or ‘reliable’ in his construct-system may tend to become looser. Progressive weakening and loss of stability in the system as a whole through repeated invalidation of parts of it is the mechanism which supposedly results in schizophrenic thought disorder.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 121 , Issue 560 , July 1972 , pp. 45 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1972 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bannister, D. (1960). ‘Conceptual structure in thought-disordered schizophrenics.’ J. ment. Sci., 106, 1230–49.Google Scholar
Bannister, D. (1962). ‘The nature and measurement of schizophrenic thought disorder.’ J. ment. Sci., 108, 825–42.Google Scholar
Bannister, D. and Fransella, F. (1966). ‘A grid test of schizophrenic thought disorder.’ Brit. J. soc. clin. Psychol., 5, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dresser, I. G. (1969). Repertory Grid Technique in the Assessment of Psychotherapy. M.Phil. Dissert., Univ. of London.Google Scholar
Foulds, G. A., Hope, K., McPherson, F. M., and Mayo, P. R. (1967). ‘Cognitive disorder among the schizophrenias: I. The validity of some tests of thought-process disorder.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 113, 1361–8.Google Scholar
Fransella, F. (1970). ‘… And then there was one.’ Contrib. to Perspectives in Personal Construct Theory (ed. Bannister, D.). Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Frith, C. D., and Lillie, B. A. (1972). ‘Why does the repertory grid test indicate thought disorder?’ Brit. J. soc. clin. Psychol., 11, 73–8.Google Scholar
Garside, R. F., and Van der Spuy, H. I. J. (1968). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Kendall, K. G., and Stuart, A. (1966). The Advanced Theory of Statistics. London: Charles Griffin and Co.Google Scholar
McCoy, M. M. (1971). Reflections of Bilingual Experience in Measures of Cognitive Structure. M.A. Thesis, Univ. of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., and Chapman, L. J. (1968). ‘Response bias and schizophrenic beliefs.’ J. abn. Psychol., 73, 252–5.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. P. N. (1971). Inconsistency, loose construing and schizophrenic thought disorder. Paper read at the London conference of the British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
Poole, B. A. (1970). ‘The clinical usefulness of the Bannister-Fransella thought disorder grid.’ Bull. Brit. Psychol. Soc., 23, 230–1.Google Scholar
Rowe, D. (1971). ‘An examination of a psychiatrist's predictions of a patient's constructs.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 118, 231–4.Google Scholar
Salmon, P. (1971). ‘What do the determinants determine? A study of the internal validity of the Rorschach.’ J. pers. Assess. Google Scholar
Watson, J. P. (1970). ‘A measure of patient-therapist understanding.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 117, 319–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, E. (1971). ‘The effect of varying the elements in the Bannister-Fransella grid test of thought disorder.’ Brit. J. Psychiat. 119, 207–12.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.