Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T23:23:32.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language Structure and Predictability in Overinclusive Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

D. S. Hart  and
R. W. Payne
D. S. Hart
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
R. W. Payne
Affiliation:
Department of Behavioral Science, Temple University Medical School, c/o Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute, Henry Avenue, Philadelphia, Pa. 19129, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Deviant language behaviour is the primary basis for the clinical inference of thought disorder. Bleuler (1950), for example, emphasizes loose associations and disjointed utterances. Mayer-Gross, Slater, and Roth (1960) state that thought disorder is indicated by such conversation characteristics as ‘woolly vagueness', in-consequential following of side issues, direction by alliteration, analogies or clang associations, and the use of words out of context. However, psychological studies have typically used measures of disordered thinking derived from performance on categorization tasks. Such tasks do not obviously measure the abnormality which is definitive for the clinician. The study reported here was an attempt to relate measures of language effectiveness to overinclusive thought disorder.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 123 , Issue 577 , December 1973 , pp. 643 - 652
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1973 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baboock, H., and Levy, L. (1940). Manual of Directions for the Revised Examination of the Measurement of Efficiency of Mental Functioning. Chicago: Stoelting.Google Scholar
Bleuler, E. (1911). Dementia Praecox. Engl. transl. 1950. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, N. (1938). ‘Reasoning, regression and communication in schizophrenia.’ Psychological Monographs, 50, No. 1 (Whole No. 221).Google Scholar
Cameron, N. (1939). ‘Schizophrenic thinking in a problem-solving situation.’ Journal of Mental Science, 85, 1012–35.Google Scholar
Chatlos, J. W. (1944). ‘Studies in language behavior: IV. A statistical and comparative analysis of individual written language samples.’ Psychological Monographs, 56, No. 4 (Whole No. 256).Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1968). Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace Hand World.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1952). ‘Schizothymia—cyclothymia as a dimension of personality.’ Journal of Personality, 20, 345–84.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, H. (1944). ‘Studies in language behaviour: II. The quantitative differentiation of samples of spoken language.’ Psychological Monographs, 56, No. 2 (Whole No. 254).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldstein, S., and Jaffe, J. (1962). ‘Vocabulary diversity of schizophrenics and normals.’ Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 5, 76–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammer, M., and Salzinger, K. (1964). ‘Some formal characteristics of schizophrenic speech as measures of social deviance.’ Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 105, 861–89.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1951). Structural Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hart, D. S. (1965). ‘Language and overinclusive thought disorder.’ Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario.Google Scholar
Hassol, L., Margaret, A., and Cameron, N. (1952). ‘The production of language disorganization through personalized distraction.’ Journal of Psychology, 33, 289–99.Google Scholar
Hawks, D. V., and Marshall, W. L. (1971). ‘A parsimonious theory of overinclusive thinking and retardation in schizophrenia.’ British Journal of Medical Psychology, 44, 75–83.Google Scholar
Hollingshead, A. B., and Redlich, F. C. (1958). Social Class and Mental Illness. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lorenz, M., and Cobb, S. (1954). ‘Language patterns in psychotic and psychoneurotic subjects.’ A.M.A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 72, 665–73.Google Scholar
McGuigan, F. J. (1960). Experimental Psychology: A Methodological Approach. Engelwood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Mann, M. B. (1944). ‘Studies in language behavior: III. The quantitative differentiation of samples of written language.’ Psychological Monographs, 56, No. 3 (Whole No. 256).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W., Slater, E., and Roth, M. (1960). Clinical Psychiatry (2nd ed.). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Mednick, S. A. (1958). ‘A learning theory approach to research in schizophrenia.’ Psychological Bulletin, 55, 356–42.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1967). The Psychology of Communication. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A., Galanier, E., and Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behaviour. New York: Holt, Rinehart Hand Winston.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W. (1961). ‘Cognitive abnormalities’, in Handbook of Abnormal Psychology (ed. Eysenck, H. J.), pp. 193–261. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W. (1971). ‘Cognitive defects in schizophrenia: Over-inclusive thinking’, in Cognitive Studies, Vol. 2 (ed. Hellmuth, J.), pp. 53–89. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W. and Friedlander, D. (1962). ‘A short battery of simple tests for measuring overinclusive thinking.’ Journal of Mental Science, 108, 362–7.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W., Friedlander, D. Laverty, S. G., and Haden, P. (1963). Over-inclusive thought disorder in chronic schizophrenics and its response to “Proketazine”.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 109, 523–30.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W., Hawks, D. V., Friedlander, D., and Hart, D. S. (1972). ‘The diagnostic significance of overinclusive thinking in an unselected psychiatric population.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 120, 173–82.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W. and Hewlett, J. H. G. (1960). ‘Thought disorder in psychotic patients’, in Experiments in Personality, Vol. 2. Psychodiagnostics and Psychodynamics (ed. Eysenck, H. J.), pp. 3–104. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C. (1948). The Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Salzinger, K., Portnoy, S., and Feldman, R. S. (1964). ‘Verbal behavior of schizophrenic and normal subjects.’ Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 105, 845–60.Google Scholar
Salzinger, K., Portnoy, S., and Feldman, R. S. (1966). ‘Verbal behavior in schizophrenics and some comments towards a theory of schizophrenia’, in Psychopathology of Schizophrenia (eds. Hoch, P. H. and Zubin, J. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Seth, G., and Beloff, H. (1959). ‘Language impairment in a group of schizophrenics.’ British Journal of Medical Psychology, 32, 288–93.Google Scholar
Shneidman, E. S. (1948). ‘Schizophrenia and the MAPS test: a study of certain aspects of fantasy production in schizophrenia as revealed by performance on the Make-a-Picture Story (MAPS) test.’ Genetic Psychology, 38, 145–223.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. L. (1953). ‘Cloze procedure: a new tool for measuring readability.’ Journalism Quarterly, 30, 415–33.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. L. (1956). ‘Recent developments in the use of cloze procedure.’ Journalism Quarterly, 33, 42–48.Google Scholar
United States Employment Service (1955). Guide to the Use of General Aptitude Test Battery. Washington, D.C.: United States Dept. of Labor.Google Scholar
Woods, W. (1938). ‘Language study in schizophrenia.’ Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 87, 290–316.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.