Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:04:59.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact factors of psychiatric journals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2018

Louise Howard*
Affiliation:
The Maudsley Hospital, London
Greg Wilkinson
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool L69 3BX
*
Dr Louise Howard, Senior Registrar, The Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, SE5 8AZ

Abstract

Background

We examined citation data for the British Journal of Psychiatry (BJP) and four other general psychiatry journals to assess their impact on the scientific community.

Method

Data on three measures of citations (total number of citations, impact factor and ranking by impact factor) were obtained from Journal Citation Reports for 1985–1994. Rank correlations from year to year were calculated.

Results

The BJP currently ranks sixth of all psychiatry journals when journals are ranked by impact factor. The journal's impact factor fell between 1985 and 1990 and this was followed by a rise in impact factor after 1991. The BJP did not rank in the top 10 psychiatry journals between 1991 and 1993. Archives of General Psychiatry is cited more frequently than any other psychiatry journal, with the American Journal of Psychiatry usually ranking second. Psychopharmacology journals are replacing more general journals in the top rankings. Rankings of most journals have become less stable in recent years.

Conclusions

The BJP would have to change the nature and number of papers published to improve its impact factor. There are a number of limitations to citation data and such data are only one of several factors useful in evaluating the importance of a journal's contribution to scientific and clinical communities.

Conflict of interest

These condauthor is Editor of the British Journal of Psychiatry.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dixon, B., (1990) The ‘top 50’: A perspective on the BMJ from the Science Citation Index. British Medical Journal, 301, 747751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garheld, E. (1972) Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science. 178, 471479.Google Scholar
Garheld, E. (1995) SCI Journal Citation Reports: A bibliometric analysis of science journals in the ISI database. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Scientific Information.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. G. & Fletcher, A. E. (1989) Citation trends of general psychiatric journals. Psychological Medicine, 19, 1518.Google Scholar
McLellan, M. F., Case, L. D. & Barnett, M. C. (1992) Trust, but verify. Anesthesiology, 77, 185188.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G. (1994) The British Journal of Psychiatry: Achieving excellence. British Journal of Psychiatry, 164 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.