Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-sl7kg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-10T01:42:06.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of a Modified Self-Report Measure of Social Adjustment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Peter Cooper ,
Madeline Osborn ,
Dennis Gath  and
Graeme Feggetter
Peter Cooper
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX
Madeline Osborn
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX
Dennis Gath
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX
Graeme Feggetter
Affiliation:
Warnford Hospital; now Consultant Psychiatrist, Peterborough District Hospital
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A self-report Social Adjustment Scale (SAS-M) for use in British populations was devised by modifying the original North American version, and its usefulness was evaluated among 331 women drawn from two local populations. In a group of mothers of one year old babies (n = 130), high levels of agreement were found between the subjects' self-ratings on the SAS-M and (i) a psychiatrist's ratings of their social adjustment made at interview; (ii) ratings of the subjects' social adjustment made by their husbands on the SAS-M; (iii) measures of concurrent mental state. In a group of women undergoing elective sterilization (n = 201), the SAS-M was found to be sensitive to changes in mental state over time. Possible applications of the SAS-M in psychiatric research, particularly when an interview is not feasible, are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 141 , Issue 1 , July 1982 , pp. 68 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Cooper, J. E., Copeland, J. R. M. Brown, G. W. et al (1977) Further studies on interviewer training and inter-rater reliability of the Present State Examination. Psychological Medicine, 7, 517–23.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. (1972) The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McNair, D. M. & Lorr, M. (1964) An analysis of mood in neurotics. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 620–7.Google Scholar
Rehm, L. P. (1978) The assessment of depression in therapy outcome research; a review of instruments and recommendation for an assessment battery. Unpublished report to the National Institute of Mental Health, USA.Google Scholar
Weissman, M. M. & Bothwell, S. (1976) Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 1111–15.Google Scholar
Weissman, M. M. Paykel, E. S., Klerman, G. L., Prusoff, B. & Hanson, B. (1974) Treatment effects on the social adjustment of depressed patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 30, 771–8.Google Scholar
Weissman, M. M. Paykel, E. S. (1974) The Depressed Woman: A Study of Social Relationships. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weissman, M. M. Paykel, E. S. Siegel, R. & Klerman, G. L. (1971) The social role performance of depressed women: comparison with a normal group. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 41, 390–405.Google Scholar
Weissman, M. M. Prusoff, B. A., Thompson, W. D., Harding, P. S. & Myers, J. K. (1978) Social adjustment by self-report in a community sample and in psychiatric out-patients. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 166, 317–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E. & Sartorius, N. (1974) The Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K. Nixon, J. M., Mann, S. A. et al (1977) Reliability of the PSE (ninth edition) used in a population study. Psychological Medicine, 7, 505–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.