Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T19:45:06.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Polarization on Normal Subjects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

L. J. Sheffield  and
R. M. Mowbray
R. M. Mowbray
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Lippold and Redfearn (1964) described the mental changes induced by the passage of small polarizing currents between two electrodes attached above the eyebrows and a single electrode on the right knee. When the forehead electrodes were positive with a total current flow of the order of 500 microamps, the mental changes consisted of an elevation of mood and an increased involvement in the environment. Forehead negative electrodes produced withdrawal and quietness. These observations were made on a group of hospitalized patients, the majority of whom were, or had been, mildly depressed. The authors state that “all would probably have been considered quite ‘normal’ by non-medical observers”.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 114 , Issue 507 , February 1968 , pp. 225 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1968 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cameron, D. E. (1945). “Some relationships between excitement, depression and anxiety” Amer. J. Psychiat., 102, 385–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clyde, D. (1963). Manual of the Clyde Mood Scale. University of Miami.Google Scholar
Costain, R., Redfearn, J. W. T., and Lippold, O. C. J. (1964). “A controlled trial of the therapeutic effects of polarization of the brain in depressive illness” Brit. J. Psychiat., 110, 786–799.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1957). The Dynamics of Anxiety and Hysteria. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Friedman, A. S. (1964). “Minimal effects of severe depression on cognitive functioning” J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 69, 3, 237–243.Google Scholar
Lifshitz, K. (1965). Correspondence in Brit. J. Psychiat., 111, 551–552.Google Scholar
Lippold, O. C. J. (1966). Private Communication.Google Scholar
Lippold, O. C. J. and Redfearn, J. W. T (1964). “Mental changes resulting from the passage of small direct currents through the human brain” Brit. J. Psychiat., 110, 768–772.Google Scholar
Nowlis, V., and Nowlis, Helen H. (1956). “The description and analysis of mood” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 55, 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfearn, J. W. T., Lippold, O. C. J., and Costain, R. (1964). “A preliminary account of the clinical effects of polarizing the brain in certain psychiatric disorders” Brit. J. Psychiat., 110, 773–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956). Non Parametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
von Felsinger, J. M., Lasagna, L., and Beecher, H. K. (1953). “The persistence of mental impairment following a hypnotic dose of a barbiturate” J. Pharmacol. and exper. Therap., 109, 284–291.Google Scholar
Welch, L., Diethelm, O., and Long, L. (1946). “Measurement of hyperassociative activity during elation” J. Psychol., 21, 113–126.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.