Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:07:26.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Varying the Elements in the Bannister-Fransella Grid Test of Thought Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Ederyn Williams
Ederyn Williams*
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Bannister and Fransella (1966) described a clinical test based on the theory and methods of Kelly (1955). This test has since been widely used in clinical practice, usually as a test of schizophrenic thought disorder, and has also been used in several studies attempting to define the schizophrenic condition more exactly (e.g. Bannister and Salmon, 1966; McPherson and Buckley, 1970; McPherson, 1969). The test was developed from the previous work of Bannister (1960, 1962) with schizophrenics and other psychiatric patients.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 119 , Issue 549 , August 1971 , pp. 207 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1971 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bannister, D. (1960). ‘Conceptual structure in thoughtdisordered schizophrenics.’ J. ment. Sci., 106, 1230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bannister, D. (1962). ‘The nature and measurement of schizophrenic thought disorder.’ J. ment. Sci., 108, 825–42.Google Scholar
Bannister, D. (1963). ‘The genesis of schizophrenic thought disorder: a serial invalidation hypothesis.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 109, 680–6.Google Scholar
Bannister, D. (1965). ‘The genesis of schizophrenic thought disorder: retest of the serial invalidation hypothesis.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 111, 377–62.Google Scholar
Bannister, D. and Fransella, F. (1966). ‘A grid test of schizophrenic thought disorder.’ Brit, J. soc. clin. Psychol., 5, 95–102.Google Scholar
Bannister, D. and Salmon, P. (1966). ‘Schizophrenic thought disorder: specific or diffuse?’ Brit. J. med. Psychol., 39, 215–19.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. L. (1957). ‘The judgement of photographs by neuropsychiatric patients.’ J. clin. Psychol., 13, 393–6.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crockett, W. H. (1965). ‘Cognitive complexity and impression formation.’ In Maher, B. (ed.) Progress in Experimental Personality Research. Vol. I. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Foulds, G. A., Hope, K., McPherson, F. M., and Mayo, P. R. (1967). ‘Cognitive disorder among the schizophrenias. I. The validity of some tests of thought isorder.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 113, 1361–8.Google Scholar
Glixman, A. F. (1965). ‘Categorizing behaviour as a function of meaning domain.’ J. pers. soc. Psychol., 2, 370–7.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Vols. I and II. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
McPherson, F. M., and Buckley, F. (1970). ‘Thought process disorder and personal construct subsystems’. Brit. J. soc. clin. Psychol. 9, 380–1.Google Scholar
McPherson, F. M., and Buckley, F. (1969). ‘Thought-process disorder, delusions of persecution and “non-integration” in schizophrenia.’ Brit. J. med. Psychol., 42, 55–7.Google Scholar
Poole, A. D. (1970). ‘The clinical usefulness of the Bannister-Fransella thought disorder grid test.’ Bull. Brit. Psychol. Soc., 23, 230–1.Google Scholar
Sarbin, T. R., and Hardyck, C. D. (1955). ‘Conformance in role perception as a personality variable.’ J. consult Psychol., 19, 109–111.Google Scholar
Turner, J. L. B. (1964). ‘Schizophrenics as judges of vocal expressions of emotional meaning.’ in Davitz, J. R. (ed.) The Communication of Emotional Meaning. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Williams, E. (1971). ‘The reactions of schizophrenics to “double-bind” type communication.’ (Bull. Brit. Psychol. Soc., 24, 63–4.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.