Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:12:59.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Depression: The Distinction between Syndrome and Symptom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

J. Mendels
J. Mendels*
Affiliation:
Affective Diseases Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania and V.A. Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa. 19104
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Few psychiatric controversies have been as persistent as the disagreement surrounding the nosology of depression. The conflict centres on the question of whether depression is a single illness, with its many faces manifestations of individual idiosyncrasy and severity, or whether it constitutes two or more separate conditions. The 1926 debate at the British Medical Association Meetings, with Edward Mapother (11) propounding the case for a single illness and Buzzard and Ross advancing claims for a dichotomy, has in one form or the other continued until today. The issue is complicated by the fact that few terms in psychiatry are used with as many different meanings as depression. Unfortunately the use of the term is seldom clearly defined. As Humpty Dumpty said in Through the Looking-Glass, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less”.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 114 , Issue 517 , December 1968 , pp. 1549 - 1554
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1968 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Areeti, S. (1959). (Ed.). American Handbook of Psychiatry, vol. 1, chap. 22. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
2. Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. E., and Erbaugh, J. K. (1962). “Reliability of psychiatric diagnoses: 2. A study of consistency of clinical judgments and ratings.” American J. Psychiat., 119, 351–357.Google Scholar
3. Cattell, R. B. (1940). “The description of personality: 1. Foundations of trait measurement.” Psychol. Rev., 50, 559–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Carney, M. W. P., Roth, M., and Garside, R. F. (1965). “The diagnosis of depressive syndromes and the prediction of E.C.T. response.” Brit. J. Psychiat., 111, 659–674.Google Scholar
5. Eysenck, H. J. (1953). The Structure of Human Personality. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
6. Grinker, R. R., Miller, J., Sabshin, M., Nunn, R., and Nunnally, J. C. (1961). The Phenomena of Depression. New York: Paul B. Hoeber, Inc.Google Scholar
7. Hamilton, M. (1960). “A rating scale for depression.” J. Neurol. Neorosurg. Psychiat., 23, 56–62.Google Scholar
8. Hordern, A., Holt, N., Bart, L., and Gorden, W. (1963). “Amitriptyline in depressive states.” Brit. J. Psychiat., 109, 815–825.Google Scholar
9. Kiloh, L. G., and Garside, R. F. (1963). “Independence of neurotic depression and endogenous depression.” Ibid., 109, 451–463.Google Scholar
10. Kraepelin, E. (1912). Clinical Psychiatry. Abstracted and adapted from Lehrbuch der Psychiatrie, 7th edn. (translated by Diefendorf, A. R.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
11. Mapother, E. (1926). “Discussion on manic-depressive psychosis.” Brit. med. J., ii, 872–879.Google Scholar
12. Mendels, J. (1967). “The prediction of response to electroconvulsive therapy.” Amer. J. Psychiat., 124, 153–159.Google Scholar
13. Mendels, J. and Cochrane, C. (1968). “The nosology of depression: the endogenous-reactive concept.” Ibid., 124, Suppl. (May) 1–11.Google Scholar
14. Rosenthal, S. H., and Gudeman, J. E. (1967). “The endogenous depressive pattern: an empirical investigation.” Arch. gen. Psychiat., 15, 186.Google Scholar
15. Sandifer, M. G., Pettus, C., and Quade, D. (1964). “A study of psychiatric diagnoses.” J. nerv. ment. Dis., 139, 350–356.Google Scholar
16. Szasz, T. S. (1961). The Myth of Mental Illness. New York: Harper & Bros.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.