Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:37:07.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Costs and Benefits of Hospital and Day Treatment with Community Care of Affective and Schizophrenic Disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2018

D. Wiersma*
Affiliation:
University of Groningen, Groningen
H. Kluiter
Affiliation:
University of Groningen, Groningen
F. J. Nienhuis
Affiliation:
University of Groningen, Groningen
M. Rüphan
Affiliation:
University of Groningen, Groningen
R. Giel
Affiliation:
University of Groningen, Groningen
*
D. Wiersma, Department of Social Psychiatry, University of Groningen, Oostersingel 59, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Background. A randomised controlled trial of day treatment with community care for patients with schizophrenic and affective disorders, referred for in-patient psychiatric treatment, was conducted to evaluate patterns of treatment and the course of illness with its psychosocial consequences over a period of two years.

Method. Seventy patients, of whom 34 had affective and 36 had schizophrenic disorder, were assigned to the experimental condition (day treatment with ambulatory and domiciliary care), and 33 patients, of whom 16 had affective and 17 had schizophrenic disorder, were assigned to the control condition of standard clinical care.

Results. Day treatment with community care was feasible for 40.6% of the affective patients and 33.3% of the schizophrenic patients. The direct treatment costs of both disorders, based on numbers of in- and day-patient days and out-patient contacts over two years, appeared more or less the same. Patients benefited equally from day treatment as from in-patient treatment, although there were some gains in self-care and in functioning in the household among experimentals. Although schizophrenics were socioeconomically worse off, and also suffered from more (severe) symptoms and social disabilities than the affective patients at entry into the study, they were similar at two years. This finding is unexpected, compared with other follow-up studies. Extra cost for patients and families were not observed. Patients and their families in the experimental condition were significantly more satisfied with the treatment. Experimental patients spent much more time at home during admission, remained much less time in secluded wards, and were more compliant with treatment.

Conclusions. Day treatment could be considered a cost-effective alternative to in-patient treatment.

Type
III. Economic Aspects of Programmes Dealing with Depressive Disorders
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1980) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn) (DSM–III). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Brook, F. G., Giel, R., ten Horn, G. H. M. M., et al (1984) Epidemiologische beschouwingen over vraag en aanbod in de geestelijke gezondheidszorg (Epidemiological considerations on supply and demand in mental health care). Department of Social Psychiatry, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Creed, F., Black, D. & Anthony, P. (1989) Day-hospital and community treatment for acute psychiatric illness. A critical appraisal. British Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 300310.Google Scholar
Creed, F., Black, D. & Anthony, P., et al (1990) Randomised controlled trial comparing day and in-patient psychiatric treatment. British Medical Journal, 300, 10331037.Google Scholar
Creed, F., Black, D. & Anthony, P., et al (1991) Randomised controlled trial of day patients and in-patient psychiatric treatment 2: Comparison of two hospitals. British Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 183189.Google Scholar
Dick, P., Cameron, L., Cohen, D., et al (1985) Day and full time psychiatric treatment: a controlled comparison. British Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 246250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erickson, D. H., Beiser, M., Iacono, W. G., et al (1989) The role of social relationships in the course of first-episode schizophrenia and affective psychosis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 14561461.Google Scholar
Fenton, F. R., Tessier, L. & Struening, E. L. (1979) A comparative trial of home and hospital care. One year follow-up. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36, 10731079.Google Scholar
Fink, E. B., Longabaugh, R. & Stout, R. (1978) The paradoxical underutilization of partial hospitalization. American Journal of Psychiatry, 135, 713716.Google Scholar
Giel, R. & ten Horn, G. H. M. M. (1982) Patterns of mental health care in a Dutch register area. Social Psychiatry, 17, 117123.Google Scholar
Herz, M. I., Endicott, J., Spitzer, R. L., et al (1971) Day versus in-patient hospitalization, a controlled study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 127, 13711381.Google Scholar
Hodiamont, P. P. G. (1986) Het zoeken van zieke zielen (Seeking sick souls). Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Hoult, J. (1990) Dissemination in New South Wales of the Madison model, in mental health care delivery. In Innovations, Impediments and Implementation (eds Marks, I. M. & Scott, R. A.), pp. 154165. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kluiter, H. (1993) Een verschil van dag en nacht. Resultaten van een gerandomiseerd onderzoek naar de vervangbaarheid van psychiatrische opname door dagbehandeling. (A difference of day and night. Results of a randomised trial of substitution of day treatment for 24 hours psychiatric admission.) Thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Kluiter, H., Büchold, H. R., Giel, R., et al (1991a) Psychofarmaca-verstrekking aan klinisch behandelde patienten versus patienten bij wie opnamevervangende dagbehandeling werd beproefd (Psychotropic drug prescribing comparing in-patients and day patients). Department of Social Psychiatry, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Kluiter, H., Giel, R., Nienhuis, F. J., et al (1991) Predicting feasibility of day treatment for unselected patients referred for in-patient psychiatric treatment: results of a randomized trial. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 11991205.Google Scholar
Kluiter, H., Giel, R., Nienhuis, F. J., et al (1991b) Belasting van het gezin bij opnamevervangende psychiatrische dagbehandeling versus klinische behandeling (Burden on the family of in-patients versus day patients). Department of Social Psychiatry, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Kris, E. B. (1965) Day hospitals. Current Therapeutic Research, 7, 320323.Google ScholarPubMed
McGlashan, T. H. (1984) The Chestnut Lodge Follow-up study. I. Follow-up methodology and study sample. II. Long-term outcome of schizophrenia and the affective disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 41, 573601.Google Scholar
Marneros, A., Deister, A. & Rohde, A. (1990) Psychopathology and social status of patients with affective, schizophrenic and schizoaffective disorders after long-term course. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 82, 352358.Google Scholar
Michaux, M. H., Chelst, M. R., Foster, S. A., et al (1972) Day and fulltime treatment, a controlled comparison. Current Therapeutic Research, 14, 279292.Google Scholar
Möller, H. J., Schmid-Bode, W., Cording-Tömmel, C., et al (1988) Psychopathological and social outcome in schizophrenia versus affective/schizoaffective psychoses and prediction of poor outcome in schizophrenia. Results from a 5–8 year follow-up. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 11, 379389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nienhuis, F. J., Giel, R., Kluiter, H., et al (1994) Efficacy of psychiatric day-treatment. Course and outcome of psychiatric disorders in a randomized trial. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 244, 7380.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, O. (1991) Cost-effectiveness of the community care for the chronically mentally ill. In Evaluation of Comprehensive Care of the Mentally Ill (eds Freeman, H. & Henderson, J.), pp. 174196. London: Gaskell.Google Scholar
Ormel, J., Koeter, M. W. J., van den Brink, W. (1990) The extent of nonrecognition of mental health problems in primary care and its effects on management and outcome. In The Public Health Impact of Mental Disorder (eds Goldberg, D. & Tantam, D. T.), pp. 154165. Lewiston, NY: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
Reynolds, I. & Hoult, J. (1984) The relatives of the mentally ill. A comparative trial of community-oriented and hospital-oriented psychiatric care. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 172, 480489.Google Scholar
Rüphan, M., Giel, R., Kluiter, H., et al (1992) Social role functioning as a separate dimension of caseness: a study of outcome of day treatment. Paper for the Symposium Psychiatric Epidemiology and Social Sciences, Oslo, 1991. Department of Social Psychiatry, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Schene, A. (1992) Psychiatrische dagbehandeling en 24-uursbe-handeling: een vergelijkend onderzoek (Psychiatric partial and full-time hospitalization). Thesis, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Stein, L. I. & Test, M. A. (1980) Alternative to mental hospital treatment. Conceptual model, treatment program and clinical evaluation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 392397.Google Scholar
Tantam, D. & McGrath, G. (1989) Psychiatric day hospitals –another route to institutionalisation? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 24, 96101.Google Scholar
Thornicroft, G. & Bebbington, P. (1989) Deinstitutionalisation: from hospital closure to service development. British Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 739753.Google Scholar
Tsuang, M. T., Woolson, R. F. & Fleming, J. A. (1979) Long-term outcome of major psychoses: I Schizophrenia and affective disorders compared with psychiatrically symptom-free surgical conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 12951301.Google Scholar
Tsuang, M. T. (1980) Social effects of schizophrenia and affective disorders. In The Social Consequences of Psychiatric Illness (eds Robins, L. N., Clayton, P. J. & Wing, J. K.), pp. 209215. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
R., van Veldhuizen J., Wiersma, D., Ram, L. M. (1988) Opname-vervangende dagbehandeling in ontwikkeling (Developing a day treatment modality for patients referred for in-patient treatment). Maandblad Geestelijke Volskgezondheid, 1, 318 Google Scholar
Washburn, S. L., Vannicelli, M. & Scheff, B. J. (1976) Irrational determinants of the place of psychiatric treatment. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 27, 179182.Google Scholar
Wiersma, D., DeJong, A. & Ormel, J. (1988) The Groningen Social Disabilities Schedule: Development, relationship with the ICIDH and psychometric properties. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 11, 213224.Google Scholar
Wiersma, D., DeJong, A., Kraaijkamp, H. J. M., et al (1990) GSDS-II: The Groningen Social Disabilities Schedule, second version. Department of Social Psychiatry, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Wiersma, D. & Giel, R. (1991) Evaluation of change in mental health care. In Evaluation of Comprehensive Care of the Mentally Ill (eds Freeman, H. & Henderson, J.), pp. 6878. London: Gaskell.Google Scholar
Wiersma, D., Giel, R., & Kluiter, H. (1994) Day treatment and community care. Policy and research in the Netherlands. In Psychiatry in Europe, Directions and Developments (eds Sensky, T., Katona, C. and Montgomery, S.), pp. 152160. London: Gaskell.Google Scholar
Wiersma, D., Kluiter, H., Nienhuis, F. J., et al (1991) Costs and benefits of day treatment with community care for schizophrenic patients. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 17, 411419.Google Scholar
Wilder, J. F., Levin, G. & Zwerling, I. H. (1966) A two-year follow-up evaluation of acute psychotic patients treated in a day hospital. American Journal of Psychiatry, 122, 10951101.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K., Nixon, J. M., Mann, S. A., et al (1977) Reliability of the PSE (ninth edition) used in a population study. Psychological Medicine, 7, 505516.Google Scholar
Zwerling, I. H. & Wilder, J. F. (1964) An evaluation of the application of the day hospital in treatment of acutely disturbed patients. The Israeli Annals of Psychiatry and Related Disciplines, 2, 162185.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.