Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:58:10.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commentary: Questionable validity of ‘dissociative amnesia’ in trauma victims

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Chris R. Brewin
Chris R. Brewin*
Affiliation:
Cognition, Emotion & Trauma Group, Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The article by Pope et al is a good illustration of why the literature on trauma and forgetting contains so many pitfalls for the unwary reader, and of how different commentators can come to radically different conclusions. As I have argued elsewhere (Brewin, 1996; Brewin & Andrews, 1997), many of the problems arise from questionable assumptions about the phenomena being studied and about what is good science. A different set of assumptions would, I believe, have led to fairer conclusions about the evidence on trauma and memory.

Type
Review Articles
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 172 , Issue 3 , March 1998 , pp. 216 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brewin, C. R. (1996) Scientific status of recovered memories British Journal of Psychiatry, 169, 131–134.Google Scholar
Brewin, C. R. (1997) Clinical and experimental approaches to understanding repression. In Recollections of Trauma Scientific Research and Clinical Practice (edt Read, D & Lindsay, D. S.), pp 145–163, New York Plenum Press Google Scholar
Brewin, C. R. & Andrews, B. (1997) Reasoning about repression inferences from clinical and experimental data In Recovered Memories and False Memories (ed. Conway, M. A.) pp. 192–205 Oxford Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Brewin, C. R., Andrews, B. & Gotlib, I. H. (1993) Psychopathology and early experience A reappraisal of retrospective reports Psychological Bulletin, 113, 82–98.Google Scholar
Elliott, D. M. (1997) Traumatic events: prevalence and delayed recall in the general population. Journal of Consulting and Psychology, 45, 811–820.Google Scholar
Feldman-Summers, S. & Pope, K. S. (1994) The experience of ‘forgetting’ childhood abuse: a national survey of psychologists. Journal of Consulting and Chinical Psychology, 62, 636–639.Google Scholar
Femina, D. D., Yeager, C. A. & Lewis, D. O. (1990) Child abuse: adolescent records v adult recall Child Abuse and Neglect, 14, 227–231 Google Scholar
Melchert, T. P. & Parker, R. L. (1997) Different forms of child abuse and memory Child Abuse and Neglect, 21, 125–135 Google Scholar
Pope, H. G., Hudson, J., Bodkin, J. A., et al (1998) Questionable validity of ‘dissociative amnesia’ in trauma victims Evidence from prospective studies. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 210–215 Google Scholar
Sorensen, T. & Snow, B. (1991) How children tell: the process of disclosure in child sexual abuse Child Welfare League of America, 70, 3–15.Google Scholar
Wagenaar, W. A. & Groeneweg, J. (1990) The memory of concentration camp survivors Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 77–87.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.