Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:23:39.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Carroll Rating Scale for Depression III. Comparison with Other Rating Instruments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Michael Feinberg ,
Bernard J. Carroll ,
Peter E. Smouse  and
Sarah G. Rawson
Michael Feinberg
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, USA
Bernard J. Carroll
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, USA
Peter E. Smouse
Affiliation:
Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, USA
Sarah G. Rawson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Patients in an affective disorders out-patient clinic were studied with four depression rating scales: the Hamilton rating scale (HRS) the Carroll rating scale (CRS) a clinical global rating of depression (CGRD) and the visual analogue scale (VAS). The overall correlations between the self ratings (CRS, VAS) and the observer ratings (HRS, CGRD) were highly significant. Both the HRS and the CRS distinguished mild from moderate, and moderate from severe depression. CRS scores increased more rapidly than HRS scores with increasing severity of depression. The concordance of self ratings and observer ratings was highest for the two structured instruments (HRS and CRS), and was lowest for the two global scales (CGRD and VAS). The global scales have the advantages of speed and simplicity, but at the cost of some reliability. Patients with non-endogenous depression had significantly increased self rating scores in comparison to patients with unipolar or bipolar endogenous depression. The correlations between the self ratings and the observer ratings were notably lower in patients with non-endogenous depression than in patients with endogenous depression. Euthymic bipolar patients rated themselves on the VAS as significantly less well than euthymic unipolar patients. The clinical and research implications of these findings are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 138 , Issue 3 , March 1981 , pp. 205 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, R. C. B. (1969) Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 62, 989–993.Google Scholar
Carroll, Bernard J ., Feinberg, Michael Smouse, Peter E. Rawson, Sarah G. & Greden, John F. (1981) The Carroll rating scale for depression. I. Development, reliability and validation. British Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 194–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, Bernard J Fielding, J. M. & Blashki, T. G. (1973) Depression rating scales: a critical review. Archives of General Psychiatry, 28, 361–366.Google Scholar
Carroll, Bernard J Feinberg, M. Greden, J. F. Haskett, R. F. James, N McI ., Steiner, M. & Tarika, J. (1980) Diagnosis of endogenous depression: Comparison of clinical, research and neuroendocrine criteria. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2, 177–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, M. (1978) Presentation at Panel, Affective Disorders Clinics: New Concept In Outpatient Care, Annual Meeting, American Psychiatric Association, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Feinberg, M. Carroll, B. J. Smouse, P. Rawson, S. Haskett, R. Steiner, M. Albala, A. & Zelnick, T. (1979) Comparison of physician and self-ratings of depression. Society of Biological Psychiatry, 34 th Annual Meeting, Abstract 80.Google Scholar
Folstein, M. F. & Luria, R. E. (1973) Reliability, validity, and clinical application of the visual analogue mood scale. Psychological Medicine, 3, 479–486.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1960) A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 23, 56–62.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1967) Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 278–296.Google Scholar
Hedlund, J. L. & Vieweg, B. W. (1979) The Hamilton rating scale for depression: a comprehensive review. Journal of Operational Psychiatry, 10, 149–165.Google Scholar
Luria, R. E. (1975) The validity and reliability of the visual analogue mood scale. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smouse, Peter E. Feinberg, Michael Carroll, Bernard J. Park, Myoung H. & Rawson, Sarah G. (1981) The Carroll rating scale for depression. II. Factor analyses of the feature profiles. British Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 201–204.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R. L. Endicott, J. & Robins, E. (1977) Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) for a Selected Group of Functional Disorders (3rd Ed.). New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.