Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:38:33.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Behavioural Models of Psychosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

J. R. Smythies
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Morningside Park, Edinburgh 10
V. S. Johnston
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Morningside Park, Edinburgh 10
R. J. Bradley
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Morningside Park, Edinburgh 10

Extract

Studies on the biological basis of psychosis are currently being conducted in a variety of disciplines and using a wide range of techniques (Smythies, 1968). These include studies of the basic mechanism of action of drugs which mimic, exacerbate or ameliorate psychosis. A major sub-section of the field is composed of structure-activity relationship (S.A.R.) studies in which we determine what effect the systematic manipulation of the molecular structure has on the activity of a drug. In this way valuable data can be obtained as to its possible mode of action. This in turn may suggest hypotheses as to the biochemical lesions in the naturally occurring psychoses. Secondly, specific behavioural responses can be made the dependent variable we measure in experiments where the levels of brain amines, activity of brain enzymes, etc., can be manipulated by any of the many techniques now available.

Type
Biochemical and Metabolic Studies
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1969 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benington, F., Morin, R. D., and Clark, L. C. (1965). “Behavioural and neuropharmacological actions of N-analkylhydroxylamines and their O-methyl ethers.” J. med. Chem., 8, 100104.Google Scholar
Blaschko, H. (1967). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Bovet, D., and Gatti, G. L. (1963). “Pharmacology of instrumental avoidance conditioning.” Proc. 2nd Int. Pharm. Meeting, Prague, 7589.Google Scholar
Clark, L. C. Jr., Benington, F., and Morin, R. D. (1965). “The effects of ring-methoxyl groups on biological deamination of phenylethylamines.” J. med. Chem., 8, 353355.Google Scholar
Clark, L. C. Jr., Morin, R. D., and Benington, F. (1964). “The enzymatic oxidative deamination and effect on cat behavior of mescaline and structurally related beta-phenylethylamines.” Alabama J. med. Sci., 1, 417429.Google Scholar
Ernst, A. M. (1965). “Relation between the structure of certain methoxyphenylethylamine derivatives and the occurrence of a hypokinetic rigid syndrome.” Psychopharrnacologia, 7, 383399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferster, C. B. (1966). “Animal behaviour and mental illness.” Psych. Record, 16, 345356.Google Scholar
Kuehl, F. A., Hickens, M., Ormond, R. E., Meisinger, M. A. P., Gale, P. H., Cirillo, V. J., and Brink, N. G. (1964). “Para-O-methylation of dopamine in schizophrenic and normal individuals.” Nature, 203, 154155.Google Scholar
Peretz, D., Smythies, J. R., and Gibson, W. C. (1955). “A new hallucinogen: trimethoxyphenyl-β-aminopropane.” J. ment. Sci., 101, 317328.Google Scholar
Sargent, T. W., Israelstam, D. M., Shulgin, A. T., Landaw, S. A., and Finley, N. N. (1967). “A note concerning the fate of the 4-methoxyl group in 3,4-dimethoxyphenylethylamine (DMPEA).” Biochem. biophys. Res. Comm., 29, 126130.Google Scholar
Shulgin, A. T. (1964). “Psychotomimetic amphetamines.” Experientia, 20, 14.Google Scholar
Smythies, J. R. (1967). “Recent advances in the biochemistry of schizophrenia.” In: Recent Developments in Schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry Special Publication No. I. (eds. Coppen, A., Walk, A.).Google Scholar
Smythies, J. R. (1968). Biological Psychiatry. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Smythies, J. R., Bradley, R. J., Johnston, V. S., Benington, F., Morin, R. D., and Clark, L. G. Jr. (1967a). “Structure-activity relationship studies on mescaline. III. The influence of the methoxy groups.” Psychopharmacologia, 10, 379387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smythies, J. R., Bradley, R. J., Johnston, V. S., Benington, F., Morin, R. D. and Leonard, F. (1967b). “The behavioural effect of some derivatives of mescaline and N: N-dimethyltryptamine in the rat.” Life Sciences, 6, 18871893.Google Scholar
Smythies, J. R., Bradley, R. J., Johnston, V. S., Benington, F., Morin, R. D. and Leonard, F. (1967c). “Interaction of stress and the response to mescaline.” Nature, 215, 11791180.Google Scholar
Smythies, J. R., Bradley, R. J., Johnston, V. S., and Bradley, R. J. (1967d). “Some behaviour-disrupting amphetamines and their significance.” Nature, 216, 129129.Google Scholar
Smythies, J. R., Johnston, V. S., and Bradley, R. J. (1967e). “Alteration by pretreatment with iproniazid and an inactive mescaline analogue of a behaviour change induced by mescaline.” Nature, 216, 196197.Google Scholar
Smythies, J. R., Johnston, V. S., and Sykes, E. A. (1964). “The effect of mescaline upon the conditioned avoidance response in the rat.” Psychopharmacologia, 6, 163172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smythies, J. R., Johnston, V. S., and Sykes, E. A. (1966a). “Structure-activity relationship studies on mescaline: the effect of dimethoxyphenylethylamine and N: N-dimethylmescaline on the conditioned avoidance response in the rat.” Ibid., 8, 324330.Google Scholar
Smythies, J. R., Johnston, V. S., and Lord, C. P. (1966b). “Structure-activity relationship studies on mescaline. II. Tolerance and cross-tolerance between mescaline and its analogues in the rat.” Ibid., 9, 434446.Google Scholar
Snyder, S. H., and Merril, G. R. (1966). “A quantum chemical correlate of hallucinogenesis.” In: Amines and Schizophrenia. (eds. Himwich, H. E., Kety, S. S. and Smythies, J. R.). London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Vojtechovsky, M. (1966). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.