Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-2mk96 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-10T22:51:18.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

[18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose position emission tomography for differential diagnosis of depressive cognitive impairment: incremental value compared with clinical diagnosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2025

Sabine Hellwig*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
Lars Frings
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
Meret Heibel
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
Nils Schroeter
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
Ganna Blazhenets
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
Katharina Domschke
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Joachim Brumberg
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
Philipp T. Meyer
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
*
Correspondence: Sabine Hellwig. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Background

Assessment of regional glucose metabolism by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose position emission tomography ([18F]FDG PET) serves as a biomarker for differential diagnosis of dementia. Conversely, depressive cognitive impairment shows no abnormalities on cerebral [18F]FDG PET.

Aims

This study validates the diagnostic value of [18F]FDG PET in addition to clinical diagnosis in a real-life gerontopsychiatric clinical population.

Method

Ninety-eight consecutive patients with depression and cognitive impairment were included. Baseline clinical diagnoses were independently established before and after disclosure of [18F]FDG PET, and dichotomised into neurodegenerative or non-neurodegenerative diseases (level 1). Subsequently, neurodegenerative cases were allocated to diagnostic subgroups (Alzheimer’s disease, Lewy body diseases, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, neurodegenerative other; level 2). An interdisciplinary, biomarker-supported consensus diagnosis after a median follow-up of 6.6 month after [18F]FDG PET served as reference. Changes of clinical diagnoses and diagnostic accuracy were assessed.

Results

After disclosure of [18F]FDG PET, level-1 clinical diagnoses changed in 23% (95% CI 16–33%) of cases, improving the diagnostic accuracy from 72% (95% CI 62–81%) to 92% (95% CI 84–96%) (P < 0.001). [18F]FDG PET was of particular value for exclusion of neurodegenerative disease. Concerning level-2 decisions, the clinical diagnoses changed in 30% (95% CI 21–40%) of cases, increasing its accuracy from 64% (95% CI 54–74%) to 85% (95% CI 76–91%) (P < 0.001). A major fraction of incorrect level-2 diagnoses comprised Alzheimer’s disease misdiagnosed as Lewy body diseases.

Conclusions

[18F]FDG PET provides a significant incremental diagnostic value beyond the clinical diagnosis in depressive cognitive impairment. Thus, [18F]FDG PET should be considered in the diagnostic work-up of patients with mental disorders and cognitive impairment.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Beach, TG, Monsell, SE, Phillips, LE, Kukull, W. Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease at National Institute on Aging Alzheimer Disease Centers, 2005-2010. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2012; 71: 266–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ismail, Z, Smith, EE, Geda, Y, Sultzer, D, Brodaty, H, Smith, G et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms as early manifestations of emergent dementia: provisional diagnostic criteria for mild behavioral impairment. Alzheimers Dement 2016; 12: 195202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiloh, LG. Pseudo-dementia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1961; 37: 336–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perini, G, Cotta Ramusino, M, Sinforiani, E, Bernini, S, Petrachi, R, Costa, A. Cognitive impairment in depression: recent advances and novel treatments. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2019; 15: 1249–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livingston, G, Huntley, J, Sommerlad, A, Ames, D, Ballard, C, Banerjee, S et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet 2020; 396: 413–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zubenko, GS, Zubenko, WN, McPherson, S, Spoor, E, Marin, DB, Farlow, MR et al. A collaborative study of the emergence and clinical features of the major depressive syndrome of Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 857–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byers, AL, Yaffe, K. Depression and risk of developing dementia. Nat Rev Neurol 2011; 7: 323–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forero, DA, Lopez-Leon, S, Gonzalez-Giraldo, Y, Dries, DR, Pereira-Morales, AJ, Jimenez, KM et al. APOE gene and neuropsychiatric disorders and endophenotypes: a comprehensive review. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2018; 177: 126–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chetelat, G, Arbizu, J, Barthel, H, Garibotto, V, Law, I, Morbelli, S et al. Amyloid-PET and (18)F-FDG-PET in the diagnostic investigation of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Lancet Neurol 2020; 19: 951–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohnen, NI, Djang, DS, Herholz, K, Anzai, Y, Minoshima, S. Effectiveness and safety of 18F-FDG-PET in the evaluation of dementia: a review of the recent literature. J Nucl Med 2012; 53: 5971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacher, J, Neumann, J, Funfstuck, T, Soliman, A, Villringer, A, Schroeter, ML. Mapping the depressed brain: a meta-analysis of structural and functional alterations in major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord 2012; 140: 142–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, L, Cai, Y, Xu, Y, Dutt, A, Shi, S, Bramon, E. Cerebral metabolism in major depressive disorder: a voxel-based meta-analysis of positron emission tomography studies. BMC Psychiatry 2014; 14: 321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, A, Newberg, A, Alavi, A, Berlin, J, Smith, R, Reivich, M. Regional cerebral glucose metabolism in late-life depression and Alzheimer disease: a preliminary positron emission tomography study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90: 7019–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, GS, Kramer, E, Ma, Y, Kingsley, P, Dhawan, V, Chaly, T et al. The functional neuroanatomy of geriatric depression. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 24: 798808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liguori, C, Pierantozzi, M, Chiaravalloti, A, Sancesario, GM, Mercuri, NB, Franchini, F, et al. When cognitive decline and depression coexist in the elderly: CSF biomarkers analysis can differentiate Alzheimer’s disease from late-life depression. Front Aging Neurosci 2018; 10: 38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, ES, Youn, H, Hyung, WSW, Suh, S, Han, CE, Eo, JS, et al. The effects of cerebral amyloidopathy on regional glucose metabolism in older adults with depression and mild cognitive impairment while performing memory tasks. Eur J Neurosci 2021; 54: 6663–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krell-Roesch, J, Syrjanen, JA, Vassilaki, M, Lowe, VJ, Vemuri, P, Mielke, MM, et al. Brain regional glucose metabolism, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and the risk of incident mild cognitive impairment: the Mayo Clinic study of aging. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2021; 29: 179–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mauri, M, Gobbo, CL, Princiotta Cariddi, L, Schiorlin, I, Versino, M. Depressive symptoms in amnesic mild cognitive impairment: an FDG-PET/CT study. Arch Med Sci 2022; 18: 1108–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nestor, PJ, Altomare, D, Festari, C, Drzezga, A, Rivolta, J, Walker, Z et al. Clinical utility of FDG-PET for the differential diagnosis among the main forms of dementia. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 45: 1509–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellwig, S, Frings, L, Bormann, T, Vach, W, Buchert, R, Meyer, PT. Amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG-PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46: 312–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schiller, F, Frings, L, Thurow, J, Meyer, PT, Mix, M. Limits for reduction of acquisition time and administered activity in (18)F-FDG-PET studies of Alzheimer dementia and frontotemporal dementia. J Nucl Med 2019; 60: 1764–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nunes, PV, Suemoto, CK, Rodriguez, RD, Paraizo Leite, RE, Nascimento, C, Pasqualucci, CA et al. Neuropathology of depression in non-demented older adults: a large postmortem study of 741 individuals. Neurobiol Aging 2022; 117: 107–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schrag, A, Horsfall, L, Walters, K, Noyce, A, Petersen, I. Prediagnostic presentations of Parkinson’s disease in primary care: a case-control study. Lancet Neurol 2015; 14: 5764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jreige, M, Kurian, GK, Perriraz, J, Potheegadoo, J, Bernasconi, F, Stampacchia, S et al. The diagnostic performance of functional dopaminergic scintigraphic imaging in the diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies: an updated systematic review. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50: 19882035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, AJ, Attems, J, Colloby, SJ, O’Brien, JT, McKeith, I, Walker, R et al. Autopsy validation of 123I-FP-CIT dopaminergic neuroimaging for the diagnosis of DLB. Neurology 2017; 88: 276–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grothe, MJ, Moscoso, A, Ashton, NJ, Karikari, TK, Lantero-Rodriguez, J, Snellman, A et al. Associations of fully automated CSF and novel plasma biomarkers with Alzheimer disease neuropathology at autopsy. Neurology 2021; 97: e122942.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cure, S, Abrams, K, Belger, M, Dell’agnello, G, Happich, M. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy in Alzheimer’s disease and other dementia using autopsy as standard of truth. J Alzheimers Dis 2014; 42: 169–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, NL, Heidebrink, JL, Clark, CM, Jagust, WJ, Arnold, SE, Barbas, NR et al. FDG-PET improves accuracy in distinguishing frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2007; 130: 2616–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsunari, I, Samuraki, M, Chen, WP, Yanase, D, Takeda, N, Ono, K et al. Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET and optimized voxel-based morphometry for detection of Alzheimer’s disease: aging effect on diagnostic performance. J Nucl Med 2007; 48: 1961–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blazhenets, G, Ma, Y, Sorensen, A, Schiller, F, Rucker, G, Eidelberg, D et al. Predictive value of (18)F-Florbetapir and (18)F-FDG-PET for conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer dementia. J Nucl Med 2020; 61: 597603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Caoimh, R, Molloy, DW. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of two cognitive screening instruments in different dementia subtypes and clinical depression. Diagnostics (Basel) 2019; 9: 93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodarzi, ZS, Mele, BS, Roberts, DJ, Holroyd-Leduc, J. Depression case finding in individuals with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 2017; 65: 937–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heo, M, Murphy, CF, Meyers, BS. Relationship between the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale in depressed elderly: a meta-analysis. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2007; 15: 899905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leontjevas, R, van Hooren, S, Mulders, A. The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia: a validation study with patients exhibiting early-onset dementia. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 17: 5664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, SA, Asberg, M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 1979; 134: 382–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Ruijter, NS, Schoonbrood, AMG, van Twillert, B, Hoff, EI. Anosognosia in dementia: a review of current assessment instruments. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2020; 12: e12079.Google ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960; 23: 5662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Crescenzo, F, Ciliberto, M, Menghini, D, Treglia, G, Ebmeier, KP, Is, Janiri L. (18)F-FDG-PET suitable to predict clinical response to the treatment of geriatric depression? A systematic review of PET studies. Aging Ment Health 2017; 21: 889–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, MJ, Foster, NL, Heidebrink, JL, Higdon, R, Aizenstein, HJ, Arnold, SE et al. Validation of consensus panel diagnosis in dementia. Arch Neurol 2010; 67: 1506–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hellwig et al. supplementary material 1

Hellwig et al. supplementary material
Download Hellwig et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 615.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Hellwig et al. supplementary material 2

Hellwig et al. supplementary material
Download Hellwig et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 42.7 KB
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.