Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T04:18:20.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Letters to the Editor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Michael Graubart
Affiliation:
18 Laitwood Road, Balham, London SW12 9QL
Andrew Porter
Affiliation:
9 Pembroke Walk, London W8 6PQ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

References

1 The latter's error in transcribing the theme of bar 50 (see Halli Cauthery's letter in Tempo 220) and then basing his analysis on the wrong transcription makes one wonder if he ever heard the piece! Or, to be charitable, did he have the rising minor third and falling sixth (minor, though, not major) of the first viola's theme in bars 29 and 30, to which I shall return (see Ex.G5 below), so much ‘in his ear’ that he confused the themes?

2 The theme is heard unharmonized except for a tonic (D) pedal; it is worth recalling that in his classes in strict counter-point Bruckner apparently taught that the minor sixth was a dissonance that had to resolve to the fifth.