Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T09:42:44.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What SNU? The Case of the Missing Solar Neutrinos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

William A. Fowler
William A. Fowler*
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif., U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The current attempts to observe solar neutrinos are reviewed. It is concluded that serious consideration must be given to the possibility that the neutrino flux from the Sun is essentially zero even though we are not yet absolutely forced to this conclusion. Transient effects in the Sun are briefly discussed as a possible explanation for the lack of solar neutrinos.

Type
Research Article
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 66: Late Stages of Stellar Evolution , 1974 , pp. 245 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1974 

References

Bahcall, J. N., Cabibbo, N., and Yahil, A.: 1972, Phys. Rev. Letters 28, 316.Google Scholar
Bahcall, J. N., Huebner, W. R., Magee, N. H. Jr., Merts, A. L., and Ulrich, R. K.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 184, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartenwerfer, D.: 1973, Astron. Astrophys. 25, 455.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. G. W.: 1973, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 11, 505. This paper contains an excellent account of the history of the development of the episodic, transient mixing model of the Sun.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chitre, S. M., Ezer, D., and Stothers, R.: 1973, Astrophys. Letters 14, 37.Google Scholar
Davis, R. Jr. and Evans, J. C.: 1973, Proceedings of the 13th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Denver, Colorado, August 17–31.Google Scholar
Demarque, P., Mengel, J. C., and Sweigart, A. V.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 183, 997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereux, I.: 1967, New Zealand J. Sci. 10, 988.Google Scholar
Dilke, F. W. W. and Gough, D. O.: 1972, Nature 240, 262.Google Scholar
Dwarakanath, M. R.: 1974, Phys. Rev. C9, 805.Google Scholar
Emiliani, C.: 1966, Science 154, 851.Google Scholar
Ezer, D. and Cameron, A. G. W.: 1972, Nature Phys. Sci. 240, 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetisov, V. N. and Kopysov, Yu. S.: 1972, Phys. Letters 40B, 602.Google Scholar
Fowler, W. A.: 1969, Contemporary Physics: Trieste Symposium , 370 (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1969); Proceedings of Cosmic Ray Studies in Relation to Recent Developments in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 256 (Tata Institute, Bombay, 1969).Google Scholar
Fowler, W. A.: 1972, Nature 238, 24; 1973, 242, 424.Google Scholar
Halbert, M. L., Hensley, D. C., and Bingham, H. G.: 1973, Phys. Rev. C8, 1226.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, R. W.: 1972, in Reines, F. (ed.), Cosmology, Fusion and Other Matters, Colorado Associated University Press, Boulder, Colorado, Chapter 10.Google Scholar
Lowenstam, H. A. and Epstein, S.: 1959, Proceedings of the 20th Congreso Geologico Internacional, p. 65.Google Scholar
Öpik, E. J.: 1952, Irish Astron. J. 2, 71.Google Scholar
Parker, P. D., Pisano, D. J., Cobern, M. E., and Marks, G. H.: 1973, Nature Phys. Sci. 241, 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rood, R. T.: 1972, Nature Phys. Sci. 240, 178.Google Scholar
Rood, R. T.: 1973, private communication.Google Scholar
Sagan, C. and Mullen, G.: 1972, Science 177, 52.Google Scholar
Sagan, C. and Young, A. T.: 1973, Nature 243, 459.Google Scholar
Ulrich, R. K.: 1974, Astrophys. J. 188, 369.Google Scholar