Article contents
Validity of the Cloud Model of the Interstellar Medium
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 August 2017
Extract
Because of the extreme irregularity in distribution of interstellar matter, some idealized model must be adopted in discussing the interstellar medium. Three simple models have been considered. The original one, long-since discarded, was a uniform distribution. This has been largely replaced by the random cloud picture in which space is visualized as filled with isolated clouds, 5–10 per kpc, about 10 pc in diameter, the array having an exponential velocity distribution with a mean of about 8 km/sec. Lastly, there is a turbulent or a random density fluctuation model.
Although the random cloud hypothesis has received most attenuation from astronomers, it has been well recognized that it is an over simplified model and should be used with some caution. This point of view has been clearly stated by many workers in this field, as the following statements by Oort and by Minkowski, respectively, demonstrate.
- Type
- Part I: Empirical Studies of Velocity Fields in, and Related Structure of, the Interstellar Medium
- Information
- Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 8: Cosmical Gas Dynamics , July 1958 , pp. 940 - 942
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Physical Society 1958
References
1 Blaauw, A., Bull. Astron. Soc. Neth. No. 436 (1952).Google Scholar
2 Osterbrock, D., Astrophys. J. 116, 164 (1952).Google Scholar
3 Aller, L. H., Astrophys. J. 113, 120 (1951).Google Scholar
4 Donn, B., Astron. J. 60, 237 (1955).Google Scholar
5 Oort, J. H., Gas Dynamics of Cosmic Clouds (Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1955), p. 226.Google Scholar
6 Minkowski, R., reference 5, p. 6.Google Scholar
7 Ambartsumian, V. A., Trans. Intern. Astron. Union 7, 452 (1950).Google Scholar
8 Bok, B. J., Bull. Harvard Coll. Obs., No. 20, 1 (1951).Google Scholar
9 Wilson, O. C. and Merrill, P. W., Astrophys. J. 86, 44 (1937).Google Scholar
10 Spitzer, L. Jr., Astrophys. J. 108, 276 (1948).Google Scholar
11 Adams, W. H., Astrophys. J. 109, 354 (1949).Google Scholar
12 Hagen, , Lilley, , and McClain, , Astrophys. J. 122, 361 (1955).Google Scholar
13 Schlüter, , Schmidt, , and Stumpf, , Z. Astrophys. 33, 194 (1953).Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by