Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:52:30.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unified Scheme for Seyferts or the Influence of Interactions?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

D. Dultzin-Hacyan
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomía UNAM, México
Ivette Fuentes Guridi
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, México
Yair Krongold
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, México
Paolo Marziani
Affiliation:
Osservatorio Astronomico de Padova, Italia

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The first statistical study of the environment of Seyfert galaxies (of both types 1 and 2) was done by Petrosian (1982), who found that Sy2 galaxies had an excess of nearby companion galaxies with respect to field galaxies. Dahari (1985) made a similar study, and obtained that both types of Seyfert galaxies are found five times more often in interacting systems that “normal” galaxies. Fuentes-Williams & Stocke (1988) obtained the opposite result: that Seyfert galaxies have no significative excess of nearby companions, and MacKenty (1989) obtained the same result as Petrosian. The last papers appeared in 1995: Rafanelli, Violato & B.aruffolo (1995) obtained a similar result as Dahari. Laurikainen & Salo (1995) made a careful attempt to understand the discrepancies; they concluded that the incompatibilities in the results were mainly due to control sample selection, and problems in background galaxy determination. Their work confirmed the result of the first study. However, in order to explain the discrepancies between previous results, they also used incorrectly defined control samples. Objections can be made against all of these works for this only reason. We have repeated the study using, for the first time, the digitized Palomar Sky Survey plates (paSS), an automated selection procedure, and correctly defined control samples (Osterbrock 1993).

Type
Nuclear Activity
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1999 

References

Dahari, O. 1985, ApJS, 57, 643 Google Scholar
Dultzin-Hacyan, D., Masegosa, J. & Moles, M. 1990, A&A, 238, 28 Google Scholar
Dultzin-Hacyan, D. 1995, RMA&A SC 3, 31 Google Scholar
Dultzin-Hacyan, D. & Ruano, C. 1996, A&A, 305, 719 Google Scholar
Fuentes-Williams, T. & Stocke, J.T. 1988, AJ, 93, 1235 Google Scholar
Huchra, J., Davis, M., Latham, D. & Tonri, J. 1983, ApJS 52, 89 Google Scholar
Jarvis, B.J. & Tyson, H. 1981, AJ, 86, 476 Google Scholar
Khachikian, E. Ye. & Weedman, D.W. 1971, Astrofizika, 7, 389 Google Scholar
Laurikainen, E. & Salo, H. 1995, A&A, 293, 683 Google Scholar
MacKenty, J.W. 1989, ApJ, 343, 125 Google Scholar
Mass-Hesse, J.M., Rodriguez-Pascual, P.M., Sanz Fernández de Córdoba, L., Mirabel, I.F., Wamsteker, W., Makino, F. & Otani, C. 1995, A&A, 298, 22 Google Scholar
Miller, J.S. & Goodrich, R.W. 1990, ApJ, 355, 456 Google Scholar
Mouri, H. Kawara, K. & Taniguchi, Y. 1997, ApJ, 484, 222 Google Scholar
Mouri, H. & Taniguchi, Y. 1992, ApJ 386, 68 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muzhotsky, R. 1997, RMA&A SC 6, 213 Google Scholar
Norris, R.P. & Roy, A.L. 1997, RMA&A SC 6, 230 Google Scholar
Osterbrock, D.E. 1993, ApJ, 404, 551 Google Scholar
Petrosian, A.R. 1982, Astrofizika, 18, 548 Google Scholar
Rafanelli, P., Violato, M. & Baruffolo, A. 1995, AJ, 109, 1546 Google Scholar
Shane, C.D. & Wirtanen, C.A. 1967, Publ. Lick Obs., 22, 647 Google Scholar
Véron-Cetty, M.P. & Véron, P. 1991, A Catalogue of Quasars and Active Nuclei, 5th ed. (ESO, Garching)Google Scholar
Villeux, S., Sanders, D. B. & Kim, D.-C. 1997, ApJ 484, 92 Google Scholar