Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T04:55:13.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ultraviolet Observations of Some Close Binary Systems by the Astronomical Netherlands Satellite-Ans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

Chi-Chao Wu*
Affiliation:
Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, Dept. of Space Research, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Observations of δ Pic, a β Lyr type of eclipsing binary and seven dwarf novae are reported. The ultraviolet light curves of δ Pic indicate the accumulation of matter at the triangular Lagrangian points L4 and L5, the presence of a hot spot and a higher temperature for the primary star. The implication is that the cooler secondary fills its Roche lobe and is transfering mass to the primary; mass loss to the circumstellar space and possibly to the system may also be appreciable. The temperatures of dwarf novae are derived by comparing their ultraviolet spectral energy distributions with those for normal stars of luminosity classes IV and V. Piecing together observations for different objects, the SSCyg systems have temperatures of 28 500 K, 10 000 K and 9500 K, respectively, when they are at minimum, immediately before outburst and at the beginning of rise to maximum. At maximum, the temperature is 22 500 K or 17 300 K depending on the interstellar reddening correction for AR And. Immediately before outburst, there is a large excess of flux in the far ultraviolet as indicated by the large value of the ratio of flux at 1550 Å to that at 1800 Å. The observations of Z Cam during standstill gives a temperature of 14 900 K. No excess of flux in the far ultraviolet was observed during the maximum of AR And and the standstill of Z Cam.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1976 

References

Aannestad, P. A. and Purcell, E. M.: 1973, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 11, 309.Google Scholar
Allen, C. W.: 1973, Astrophysical Quantities , Athlone Press, London.Google Scholar
Bless, R. C. and Savage, B. D.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 171, 293.Google Scholar
Code, A. D., Davis, J., Bless, R. C., and Hanbury Brown, R.: 1975, Astrophys. J. (submitted).Google Scholar
Cousins, A. W. J.: 1966, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 131, 443.Google Scholar
Duinen, R. J. van, Aalders, J. W. G., Wesselius, P. R., Wildeman, K. J., Wu, C. C., Luinge, W., and Snel, D.: 1975, Astron. Astrophys. 39, 159.Google Scholar
Evans, R. G.: 1974, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 167, 517.Google Scholar
Heise, J., Brinkman, A. C., Schrijver, J., Mewe, R., Groneschild, E., and Boggende, A. den: 1975, (preprint).Google Scholar
Holm, A. V. and Gallagher, J. S. III: 1974, Astrophys. J. 192, 425.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. L.: 1963, in Strand, K. Aa. (ed.), Basic Astronomical Data , Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 204.Google Scholar
Kraft, R. P. and Luyten, W.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 142, 1041.Google Scholar
Krzeminski, W.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 142, 1051.Google Scholar
Lesh, J. R.: 1972, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 5, 129.Google Scholar
Thackeray, A. D.: 1966, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 131, 435.Google Scholar
Walker, M. F. and Chincarini, G.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 154, 157.Google Scholar
Warner, B.: 1974, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 168, 235.Google Scholar
Warner, B. and Nather, R. E.: 1971, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 152, 219.Google Scholar
Wu, C.-C.: 1975, Astrophys. Space Sci. (in press).Google Scholar