Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:10:24.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Turbulence and Cloud Angular Momentum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2016

Andreas Burkert
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Peter Bodenheimer
Affiliation:
UCO/Lick Observatory, Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Numerical models of molecular cloud cores are obtained, with assumed Gaussian random velocity fields that are consistent with moderate turbulence. If the velocity power spectrum is taken to be P(k) ∼ kn, with n = − 4 or −3, then the constructed line-of-sight velocity maps on the plane of the sky show gradients that can be interpreted as rotation. Deduced values of angular velocity, angular momentum, and dimensionless rotational parameter β are consistent with observations. The velocity gradient Ω, of an individual core is not a good indicator of its intrinsic angular momentum J/M. However, the distribution of deduced angular momenta from a large sample of cores with different random velocity fields is close to the distribution of actual angular momenta of these model cores if one assumes J/M = pΩR2 where R is the core radius and p must be determined from a Monte-Carlo study. For centrally condensed cores the standard value of p = 0.4 overestimates the mean intrinsic angular momentum by a factor of 3.

Type
IV. Initial Conditions for Binary Formation and Protobinary Systems
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2001 

References

Barranco, J. A., & Goodman, A. A. 1998, ApJ, 504, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkert, A., & Bodenheimer, P. 2000, ApJ, in press.Google Scholar
Bodenheimer, P., Burkert, A., Klein, R. I., & Boss, A. P. 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, ed. Mannings, V., Boss, A. P. & Russell, S. (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 675.Google Scholar
Dubinski, J., Narayan, R., & Phillips, G. 1995, ApJ, 448, 226.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, P. F., & Arquilla, R. 1985, in Protostars and Planets II, ed. Black, D. C. & Matthews, M. S. (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 137.Google Scholar
Goodman, A. A., Barranco, J. A., Wilner, D. J., & Heyer, M. H. 1998, ApJ, 504, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, A. A., Benson, P., Fuller, G., & Myers, P. 1993, ApJ, 406, 528.Google Scholar
Larson, R. B. 1981, MNRAS, 194, 809.Google Scholar
Mac Low, M.-M., Klessen, R. S., Burkert, A., & Smith, M. D. 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 2754.Google Scholar
Ward-Thompson, D., Motte, F., & André, P. 1999, MNRAS, 305, 143.Google Scholar