Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:08:54.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theory of the Intermediate Zone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2017

Julian H. Krolik
Julian H. Krolik*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore Maryland 21218, U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The “intermediate zone” is the several decades in radius between the broad and narrow emission line regions in active galactic nuclei. As Antonucci and Miller (1985) first discovered, it comprises two basic structures: an obscuring torus, and a reflection region which fills the hole of the torus and extends some ways above its top. Recent theoretical work, reviewed here, has concentrated on understanding both the thermal/ionization state, and the dynamical state of both regions. The torus is probably composed of a large number of dusty, molecular clouds of large column density and unusually high temperature and ionization fraction, while the reflection region is hot and highly ionized. Spectroscopic diagnostics exist for both. The key problem, still essentially unsolved, in the dynamics of the torus is its geometrical thickness. The reflection region is probably a pressure-driven transonic wind whose source is material evaporated by photoionization from the inner surface of the torus, but a small fraction of it may actually be accreting onto the nucleus.

Type
Part 5: Structure of the Central Object and NLR
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 134: Active Galactic Nuclei , 1989 , pp. 285 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1989 

References

Antonucci, R.R.J. and Miller, J.S., 1985, Ap. J. 297, 621.Google Scholar
Balbus, S.A. and McKee, C.F., 1982, Ap. J. 252, 529.Google Scholar
Begelman, M.C., McKee, C.F., and Shields, G.A., 1983, Ap. J. 271, 70.Google Scholar
Burg, R., 1987, private communication.Google Scholar
Claussen, M.J. and Lo, K.-Y., 1986, Ap. J. 308, 592.Google Scholar
Edelson, R.A., Malkan, M.A., and Rieke, G.H., 1987, Ap. J. 321, 238.Google Scholar
Elvis, M. and Lawrence, A., 1988, Ap. J. in press.Google Scholar
Goldreich, P. and Tremaine, S., 1978, Icarus 34, 227.Google Scholar
Krolik, J.H. and Begelman, M.C., 1986, Ap. J. Lett. 308, L55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krolik, J.H. and Begelman, M.C., 1988, Ap. J. 329, 702.Google Scholar
Krolik, J.H. and Kallman, T.R., 1987, Ap. J. Lett. 320, L5.Google Scholar
Krolik, J.H. and Lepp, S., 1988, Ap. J. submitted.Google Scholar
Kylafis, N.D. and Norman, C.A., 1986, Ap. J. Lett. 300, L73.Google Scholar
Kylafis, N.D. and Norman, C.A., 1987, Ap. J. 323, 346.Google Scholar
Lepp, S., McCray, R.M., Shull, J.M., Woods, D.T., and Kallman, T.R., 1985, Ap. J. 288, 58.Google Scholar
Miller, J.S., 1988, in Active Galactic Nuclei, eds. Wiita, P.J. and Miller, H.R. (Springer-Verlag: Berlin)Google Scholar
Mushotzky, R.F., 1987, private communication.Google Scholar
Wilson, A.S. and Heckman, T.M., 1985, in Astrophysics of Active Galaxies and Quasi-Stellar Objects (University Science Books: Mill Valley CA)Google Scholar