Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T21:48:27.860Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Structure of Umbral Fluxtubes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

D Degenhardt
Affiliation:
High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, U.S.A.
B. W. Lites
Affiliation:
High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Subsurface filamentation of sunspot magnetic fields has been postulated as a source of the visible small-scale structure of sunspot umbrae. We examine this possibility by investigating the magnetohydrodynamic structure of thin, vertical magnetized gas columns embedded in sunspot umbrae. These umbral fluxtubes are assumed to have weaker field strengths than the surrounding umbral atmosphere. The steady-state magnetohydrodynamic equations are solved numerically in the slender fluxtube approximation, thus allowing for stationary internal mass flows. We include the radiative exchange of heat between the umbral fluxtube and the ambient medium using a simple relaxation time approach.

The geometric shape of the steady flow solution is a gas column converging with height. We discuss the relationship of our results to observed properties of umbral brightenings (umbral dots). We show that, even if there is a large difference in magnetic field strength between the dot and the ambient medium in deeper layers, the field strengths are nearly equal in the observable layers, a result required by the observations. We also show that either high temperatures at the lower boundary of the dots or strong upflows are needed in order to produce bright continuum structures.

Type
Part 5: Magnetic Fields and Infrared Magnetometry
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1994 

References

Bruls, J. H. M. J., Lites, B. W., Murphy, G. A.: 1991, in November, L. J. (ed.), Solar Polarimetry, Proc. 11th National Solar Observatory/Sacramento Peak Summer Workshop, p. 444.Google Scholar
Choudhuri, A. R.: 1986, Astrophys. J. 302, 809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degenhardt, D.: 1991, Astron. Astrophys. 248, 637.Google Scholar
Lites, B. W., Bida, T. A., Johannesson, A., Scharmer, G. B.: 1991, Astrophys. J. 373, 683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltby, P., Avrett, E. H., Carlsson, M., Kjeldseth-Moe, O., Kurucz, R. L., Loeser, R.: 1986, Astrophys. J. 306, 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, E. N.: 1979, Astrophys. J. 230, 905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spruit, H. C.: 1981, in Cram, L. E. and Thomas, J. H. (eds.), The Physics of Sunspots, Sunspot, New Mexico, p. 98.Google Scholar