Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-n2sc8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-07T10:09:48.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

STarburst Models for AGNs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Roberto Terlevich ,
Jorge Melnick  and
Mariano Moles
Roberto Terlevich
Affiliation:
RGO Herstmonceux Castle Hailsham E Sussex BN27 1RP, UK
Jorge Melnick
Affiliation:
ESO Garching bei Munchen Munich Germany
Mariano Moles
Affiliation:
Obs. Nacional Madrid Spain

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A significant fraction of all spiral galaxies exhibit some type of “activity” in their nuclear regions as evidenced by the presence of emission lines in their optical spectrum (Keel, 1982; Cetty-Veron and Veron, 1985). It has become standard to classify emission-line galaxies into two main groups: “active” having Seyfert or Liner nuclei and “inactive”, having Starburst or HII-region like nuclei. Two main classification criteria are used, one based in the widths (Khachikian and Weedman 1974) the other in the intensity ratios of the nuclear emission lines (Baldwin, Phillips and Terlevich, 1981).

Type
VIII. Starburst Activity
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 121: Observational Evidences of Activity of Galaxies , 1987 , pp. 499 - 519
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1987 

References

Adams, T.F. and Weedman, D.W. 1975, Astrophys. J., 199, 19.Google Scholar
Allen, D.A., Roche, P.F. and Norris, R.P. 1985, M.N.R.A.S. 213, 67p.Google Scholar
Alloin, D., Pelat, D., Phillips, M.M., Fosbury, R.A.E. and Freeman, K. 1986, Astrophys. J. 308, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andriesse, C.D., Donn, B. D. and Viotti, R. 1978, M.N.R.A.S. 185, 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, J.A., Phillips, M.M. and Terlevich, R.J. 1981, P.A.S.P. 93, 5.Google Scholar
Campbell, A.W. and Terlevich, R.J. 1984, M.N.R.A.S. 211, 15.Google Scholar
Cetty-Veron, M.-P. and Veron, P. 1986, Astr. and Astrophys. Suppl. S. 65, 241.Google Scholar
Chevalier, R.A. 1976, Astrophys. J. 208, 826.Google Scholar
Chevalier, R.A. 1982, Astrophys. J. 259, 302.Google Scholar
Chiosi, C. 1981, in “The most massive stars” (eds. D'Odorico, et al.) 261.Google Scholar
Claussen, M.J. and Lo, K.Y. 1986, Astrophys. J. 308, 592.Google Scholar
Condon, J.J., Condon, M.A., Gisler, G. and Puschell, J.J. 1982, Astrophys. J. 252, 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti, P.S. and Garmani, C.D. 1983, Astrophys. J. 284, 705.Google Scholar
Cowley, A.P., Crampton, D. and McClure, R.D. 1982, Astrophys. J. 263, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dibai, E.A. and Lyutyi, V.M. 1984, Sov. Astron. 28, 7.Google Scholar
Fabbiano, G., Feigelson, E. and Zamorani, G. 1982, Astrophys. J. 256, 397.Google Scholar
Faber, S.M. 1977, in “The evolution of galaxies and stellar populations” (ed. Tinsley, B.M. and Larson, R.B.)Google Scholar
Field, G.B. 1964, Astrophys. J. 140, 1434.Google Scholar
Fransson, C. 1982, Astr. and Astrophys. 111, 140.Google Scholar
Franssen, C. 1984, Astr. and Astrophys. 133, 264.Google Scholar
Harwit, M. and Pacini, F. 1975, Astrophys. J. 200, L127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckmann, T.M., Balick, B. and Crane, P.C. 1980, Astr. and Astrophys. Supp. 40, 295.Google Scholar
Heckmann, T.M., Van Breugel, W., Miley, G.K. and Butcher, H.R. 1983, Astr. J. 88, 1077.Google Scholar
Heckmann, T.M. et al. 1986, Astrophys. J. 305, 1257.Google Scholar
Houck, J.R. et al. 1985, Astrophys. J. 290, L5.Google Scholar
Jones, J.E., Alloin, D. and Jones, B.J.T. 1984, Astrophys. J. 283, 457.Google Scholar
Keel, W.C. 1982, Astrophys. J. Supp. 52, 229.Google Scholar
Khachikian, E.E. and Weedman, D.W. 1974, Astrophys. J. 192, 581.Google Scholar
Kinmann, T.D. and Davidson, K. 1981, Astrophys. J. 243, 127.Google Scholar
Koski, A. 1978, Astrophys. J. 223, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriss, G.A., Canizares, C.R. and Ricker, G.R. 1980, Astrophys. J. 242, 492.Google Scholar
Lawrence, A. and Elvis, M. 1984, Astrophys. J. 256, 410.Google Scholar
Lequeux, J. 1980 in “Star formation” (ed. Maeder, A. and Martinet, L.).Google Scholar
Lyutyi, V.M. 1977, Sov. Astron. 21, 655.Google Scholar
Lyutyi, V.M. 1979, Sov. Astron. 23, 518.Google Scholar
Maeder, A. and Lequeux, J. 1982, Astr. and Astrophys. 114, 409.Google Scholar
Maeder, A. 1983, Astr. and Astrophys. 120, 113.Google Scholar
Maeder, A. 1985, Private communication.Google Scholar
Malkan, M.A. and Filippenko, A.V. 1983, Astrophys. J. 275, 477.Google Scholar
Malkan, M.A. and Oke, J.B. 1983, Astrophys. J. 265, 92.Google Scholar
McCrea, W.H. 1976, in “The galaxy and the local group” (ed. Dickens, R.J. and Perry, J.E.)Google Scholar
Melnick, J., Terlevich, R. and Eggleton, P.P. 1985, MNRAS 216, 255.Google Scholar
Melnick, J., Moles, M. and Terlevich, R. 1985, Astr. and Astrophys. 149, L24 Google Scholar
Moffat, J.W., Seggewiss, W. and Shara, M.M. 1985, Astrophys. J. 295, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neugebauer, G. et al. 1976, Astrophys. J. 205, 29.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, G. et al. 1980, Astrophys. J. 238, 502.Google Scholar
Osterbrock, D.E. 1978, Phys. Scripta 17, 285.Google Scholar
Pronik, I.I. 1973, Sov. Astr. 16, 628.Google Scholar
Rayo, E. et al. 1982, Astrophys. J. 255, 1.Google Scholar
Rees, M.J. 1978, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 320, 613.Google Scholar
Rees, M.J. 1984, Ann. Rev. Astron. and Astrophys. 22, 471.Google Scholar
Rieke, G.H. and Lebofsky, M.J. 1979, Ann. Rev. Astron. and Astrophys. 17, 477.Google Scholar
Rieke, G.H. et al. 1980, Astrophys. J. 238, 24.Google Scholar
Rosa, M. 1980, Astr. and Astrophys. 85, L21.Google Scholar
Savage, B. et al. 1983, Astrophys. J. 273, 597.Google Scholar
Shklovskii, I.S. 1960, Soviet Astr. 4, 885.Google Scholar
Simien, F. and de Vaucouleurs, G. 1986, Astrophys. J. 302, 564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, W.A. and Soifer, B.T. 1983, Ann. Rev. Astr. and Astrophys. 21, 177.Google Scholar
Stothers, R. and Chin, C.W. 1979, Astrophys. J. 233, 267.Google Scholar
Tanaka, S. 1966, P.A.S.J. 18, 47.Google Scholar
Terlevich, R. 1982, , Cambridge Univ. Google Scholar
Terlevich, R. and Melnick, J. 1981, M.N.R.A.S. 195, 839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlevich, R. and Melnick, J. 1985, M.N.R.A.S., 213, 841.Google Scholar
Terlevich, E., Diaz, A.I. and Terlevich, R. 1987, in preparation.Google Scholar
Ulrich, M.H. et al. 1984, M.N.R.A.S. 206, 221.Google Scholar
Ulvestad, J.S., Wilson, A.S. and Sramek, R.A. 1981, Astrophys. J. 247, 419.Google Scholar
Ulvestad, J.S. 1982, Astrophys. J. 259, 96.Google Scholar
Weedman, D.W. 1983, Astrophys. J. 266, 479.Google Scholar
Weiler, K.W. et al. 1986, Astrophys. J. 301, 790.Google Scholar
Wheeler, J.C., Mazurek, T.J. and Sivaramakrishnan, A. 1980, Astrophys. J. 237, 781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, B.C., Kirshner, R.P. and Schechter, P.L. 1979, Astrophys. J. 234, 68.Google Scholar
Woosley, S.E. and Weaver, T.A. 1982, in “Supernovae: a survey of current research” (ed. Rees, M.J. and Stonehand, R.J.).Google Scholar
Wright, G.S., Joseph, R.D. and Meikle, W.P.S. 1984, Nature 309, 430.Google Scholar
van der Hucht, K.A. 1981, in “The most massive stars” (ed. D'Odorico, S. Baade, D. and Kjar, K.).Google Scholar
van der Hucht, K.A., Williams, P.M. and The, P.S. 1986, in “Circumstellar matter” (ed. Appenzeller, I.).Google Scholar